Natural airway as an alternative to intubation for pediatric endoscopic esophageal foreign body removal: A retrospective cohort study of 326 patients.

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia is required for endoscopic removal of esophageal foreign bodies (EFBs) in children. Historically, endotracheal intubation has been the de facto gold standard for airway management in these cases. However, as more elective endoscopic procedures are now performed under propofol sedation with natural airway, there has been a move toward using similar Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) for select patients who require endoscopic removal of an EFB. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we compared endoscopic EFB removal with either MAC or endotracheal intubation. Descriptive statistics summarized factors stratified by initial choice of airway technique, including intra- and postanesthesia complications and the frequency of mid-procedure conversion to endotracheal intubation in those initially managed with MAC. To demonstrate the magnitude of associations between these factors and the anesthesiologist's choice of airway technique, univariable Firth logistic and quantile regressions were used to estimate odds ratios (95% CI) and beta coefficients (95% CI). RESULTS: From the initial search, 326 patients were identified. Among them, 23% (n = 75) were planned for intubation and 77% (n = 251) were planned for MAC. Three patients (0.9%) who were initially planned for MAC required conversion to endotracheal intubation after induction. Two (0.6%) of these children were admitted to the hospital after the procedure and treated for ongoing airway reactivity. No patient experienced reflux of gastric contents to the mouth or dislodgement of the foreign body to the airway, and no patient required administration of vasoactive medications or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Patients had higher odds that the anesthesiologist chose to utilize MAC if the foreign body was a coin (OR, 3.3; CI, 1.9-5.7, p < .001) or if their fasting time was >6 h. Median total operating time was 15 min greater in intubated patients (11 vs. 26 min, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that MAC may be considered for select pediatric patients undergoing endoscopic removal of EFB, especially those who have ingested coins, who do not have reactive airways, who have fasted for >6 h, and in whom the endoscopic procedure is expected to be short and uncomplicated. Prospective multi-site studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Comparison of general endotracheal anesthesia versus sedation without endotracheal intubation during initial percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion for infants: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Critical airway incidents are a major cause of morbidity and mortality during anesthesia. Delayed management of airway obstruction quickly leads to severe complications due to the reduced apnea tolerance in infants and neonates. The decision of whether to intubate the trachea during anesthesia is therefore of great importance, particularly as an increasing number of procedures are performed outside of the operating room. AIM: In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated airway management for infants below 6 months of age undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion. We compared demographic, procedural, and health outcome-related data for infants undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion under general endotracheal anesthesia (n = 105) to those receiving monitored anesthesia care (n = 44) without endotracheal intubation. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed for all infants <6 months of age who underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion in our institution's endoscopy suite between January 2002 and January 2017. Descriptive statistics summarized numeric variables using medians and corresponding ranges (minimum-maximum), and categorical variables using frequencies and percentages. Differences in study outcomes between patients undergoing general anesthesia or monitored anesthesia care were evaluated with univariate quantile or Firth logistic regression for numerical and categorical outcomes, respectively. Results are presented as ß [95% confidence interval] or odds ratio [95% confidence interval] along with corresponding p-values. RESULTS: Both groups were similar in distribution of age, race, and gender. However, patients selected for general anesthesia had lower median body weights (3.9 kg [range: 2.0-6.7] vs. 4.4 kg [range: 2.6-6.9]), higher percentages of cardiac (95.2% vs. 84.1%), and/or neurologic comorbidities (74.3% vs. 56.8%) and were more frequently given American Society of Anesthesiologists level IV classifications (41.9% vs. 29.6%) indicating that these infants may have had more severe disease than patients selected for monitored anesthesia care. Three monitored-anesthesia-care patients required intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia. General anesthesia patients experienced greater odds of intraoperative hypoxemia (45.2% vs. 29.0%; odds ratio: 2.0 [0.9-4.3], p-value: .09) and required postoperative airway intervention more frequently than monitored-anesthesia-care patients (13.03% vs. 2.3%; odds ratio: 4.6 [0.8-25.6], p-value: .08). Procedure times were identical in both groups (6 min), but general anesthesia resulted in longer median anesthesia times (44 min [range: 22-292] vs. 12 min [range:19-136]; ß:13 [95% 6.9-19.1], p-value: < .001). CONCLUSION: Study results suggest that providers selected general anesthesia over monitored anesthesia care for infants and neonates with low body weights, cardiac comorbidities, and neurologic comorbidities. Increased rates of airway intervention, and increased length of stay may be at least partially related to more severe patient comorbidity, as indicated by higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classifications. However, due to the exploratory nature of these analyses, further confirmatory studies are needed to evaluate the impact of airway selection during PEG on postoperative patient outcomes.

How to optimize the perioperative care of patients with orphan diseases: what the anesthesiologist needs to know.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite a very low individual prevalence, rare or orphan diseases are estimated to collectively affect as much as 6-8% of the general population. These diseases provide a challenge to anesthetic delivery because of the lack of evidence to guide optimal management. RECENT FINDINGS: The expansion of information technology has made facts about individual orphan diseases easier to find. Several reputable websites, hosted variously by anesthetic societies, rare disease organizations, and government agencies, provide information about rare diseases and anesthetic management. SUMMARY: Improved access to resources of knowledge may allow for more informed anesthetic management of orphan diseases. The combination of a thorough review of existing knowledge about individual diseases and a structured anesthetic assessment may assist in the delivery of well tolerated anesthetic care of rare conditions.

Single limb electrocardiogram using vector mapping: Evaluation and validation of a novel medical device.

INTRODUCTION: The Tiger Tech Warfighter Monitor (WFM) is a novel single-limb device for ECG acquisition. The WFM provides true (not derived) single limb Electrocardiogram monitoring (ECG) to provide heart rate and R-R interval monitoring between QRS complexes. Herein, we evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the WFM heart rate, R-R interval monitoring, and heart rate variability monitoring in comparison to a 2­lead chest ECG. METHODS: Data was collected under Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval. Patients available within our institution's pre-operative holding unit were randomly selected to undergo simultaneous chest and WFM ECG monitoring. 3-5-min measurements were taken depending on the patient's availability. Data was saved to two separate mobile phones and time-stamped for synchronization. A proprietary Tiger Tech extraction algorithm was used to tag proper features on both the WFM 1-Limb ECG and Chest ECG data files. A separate algorithm was then used to compare the beat-to-beat variations between the ECGs. RESULTS: Data was extracted and analyzed on 26 subjects. Linear regression of heart rate analysis revealed excellent correlations with an R2 of 0.99 (p < 0.05). Similar linear regression evaluation of R-R interval correlation demonstrated a mean R2 value of 0.95 (p < 0.05). Statistically significant correlation was achieved in all 26 included study participants. Heart rate variability also achieved excellent correlation (SDNN R2 = 0.997, RMSSD R2 = 0.995, LnRMSSD R2 = 0.992, p << 0.05). CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate that the WFM achieves excellent correlation with chest ECG for heart rate, R-R internals, and heart rate variability.

Comparison of Tolerance and Complication Rates Between Early and Delayed Feeding After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement in Children.

BACKGROUND: Enteral nutrition is commonly initiated 24 hours after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in children. Adult studies report safe refeeding within 1 to 6 hours of PEG, and these findings have been cautiously applied to children. Comparative studies assessing early versus next-day refeeding in children are currently lacking. This study evaluates feeding tolerance and complications following early versus next-day refeeding in children. METHODS: This is a single-center, pre-post study. In June 2015 our clinical practice changed to begin refeeding within 6 hours of PEG. Children receiving early refeeding from December 2015 to August 2017 were included. A retrospective cohort from February 2013 to April 2015 was used for comparison. RESULTS: Forty-six children received early refeeding after PEG and 37 received next-day refeeding. Gender distribution was similar in the 2 groups. Early refeeding patients were slightly older (3.5 vs 2.2 years) and heavier (15.5 vs 11.5 kg) at PEG placement compared to next-day refeeding patients. Early refeeding patients experienced greater postprocedural nausea and/or vomiting (19% vs 8%, P < 0.001) and leakage, irritation, and infection around the stoma (19% vs 0.0%, P < 0.001). Compared to early refeeders, next-day refeeding patients experienced higher occurrence of fever (35% vs 13%, P = 0.021), longer nutritional disruption (24.6 vs 3.7 hours, P < 0.001), and longer length of stay (51 vs 27 hours; P < 0.001). One next-day refeeding patient experienced peritonitis. One early refeeding patient experienced cellulitis requiring hospitalization and a second experienced gastrostomy tube migration into the peritoneal cavity requiring removal. CONCLUSION: Early refeeders experienced higher rates of postprocedural nausea or vomiting and irritation, leakage, or infection around the stoma; but experienced lower rates of postoperative fever. Early refeeding resulted in reduced nutritional interruption and hospital length of stay.

A Comprehensive Review of Over-the-counter Treatment for Chronic Migraine Headaches.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Migraine headaches are a neurologic disorder characterized by attacks of moderate to severe throbbing headache that are typically unilateral, exacerbated by physical activity, and associated with phonophobia, photophobia, nausea, and vomiting. In the USA, the overall age-adjusted prevalence of migraine in female and male adults is 22.3% and 10.8%, respectively. RECENT FINDINGS: Migraine is a disabling disease that ranks as the 8th most burdensome disease in the world and the 4th most in women. The overarching hypothesis of migraine pathophysiology describes migraine as a disorder of the pain modulating system, caused by disruptions of the normal neural networks of the head. The activation of these vascular networks results in meningeal vasodilation and inflammation, which is perceived as head pain. The primary goals of acute migraine therapy are to reduce attack duration and severity. Current evidence-based therapies for acute migraine attacks include acetaminophen, four nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), seven triptans, NSAID-triptan combinations, dihydroergotamine, non-opioid combination analgesics, and several anti-emetics. Over-the-counter medications are an important component of migraine therapy and are considered a first-line therapy for most migraineurs. These medications, such as acetaminophen, ibuprofen, naproxen, and aspirin, have shown strong efficacy when used as first-line treatments for mild-to-moderate migraine attacks. The lower cost of over-the-counter medications compared with prescription medications also makes them a preferred therapy for some patients. In addition to their efficacy and lower cost, over-the-counter medications generally have fewer and less severe adverse effects, have more favorable routes of administration (oral vs. subcutaneous injection), and reduced abuse potential. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive evidence-based update of over-the-counter pharmacologic options for chronic migraines.

A Comprehensive Update on the Treatment and Management of Postdural Puncture Headache.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive review of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) with a focus on epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prophylaxis. RECENT FINDINGS: PDPH is an adverse iatrogenic complication of neuraxial anesthesia that occurs following inadvertent puncture of the dura after epidural or spinal anesthesia. The overall incidence of PDPH after neuraxial procedures varies from 6 to 36%. The occurrence of PDPH can lead to increased patient morbidity, delayed discharge, and increased readmission. PDPH is a self-limiting postural headache that most often will resolve within 1 week, without need for treatment. Various prophylactic measures have been studied; however, more studies have been recommended to be undertaken in order to establish a proven benefit. For mild PDPH, conservative treatments are currently focused around bed rest, as well as oral caffeine. For moderate-to-severe PDPH, epidural blood patch (EBP) remains the most effective treatment; however, this invasive treatment is not without inherent risks. Further less invasive treatments have been explored such as epidural saline, dextran 40 mg solutions, hydration, caffeine, sphenopalatine ganglion blocks, greater occipital nerve blocks, and surgical closure of the gap; all have shown promise. Further studies are essential to prove efficacy as well as safety over the proven treatment of epidural blood patches. There is still limited evidence in literature about the understanding of PDPH and optimal treatment.

A Comprehensive Review of the Celiac Plexus Block for the Management of Chronic Abdominal Pain.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic abdominal pain (CAP) is a significant health problem that can dramatically affect quality of life and survival. Pancreatic cancer is recognized as one of the most painful malignancies with 70-80% suffering from substantial pain, often unresponsive to typical medical management. Celiac plexus neurolysis and celiac plexus block (CPB) can be performed to mitigate pain through direct destruction or blockade of visceral afferent nerves. The objective of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive review of the CPB as it pertains to CAP with a focus on the associated anatomy, indications, techniques, neurolysis/blocking agents, and complications observed in patients who undergo CPB for the treatment of CAP. RECENT FINDINGS: The CAP is difficult to manage due to lack of precision in diagnosis and limited evidence from available treatments. CAP can arise from both benign and malignant causes. Treatment options include pharmacologic, interventional, and biopsychosocial treatments. Opioid therapy is typically utilized for the treatment of CAP; however, opioid therapy is associated with multiple complications. CPB has successfully been used to treat a variety of conditions resulting in CAP. The majority of the literature specifically related to CPB is surrounding chronic pain associated with pancreatic cancer. The literature shows emerging evidence in managing CAP with CPB, specifically in pancreatic cancer. This review provides multiple aspects of CAP and CPB, including anatomy, medical necessity, indications, technical considerations, available evidence, and finally complications related to the management.

The Role of the Cannabinoid System in Pain Control: Basic and Clinical Implications.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive update of the different known components of the endogenous cannabinoid system and the mechanisms of action, as it applies to analgesia. RECENT FINDINGS: Following the discovery of the endogenous cannabinoid system in the early 1990s and the subsequent characterization of the cannabinoid receptor, there has been a renewed interest in cannabinoid research. Recent work has demonstrated its efficacy as a pharmacologic agent. There is limited evidence in the literature about the understanding of the endocannabinoid system and its role in the treatment and management of acute and chronic pain. Further work may elucidate additional roles for the endocannabinoid system within our nervous system and, moreover, additional subtypes of cannabinoid receptors have yet to be discovered. Cannabinoid compounds mediate their biological effects via binding and subsequent activation of cannabinoid receptors. These receptors are located throughout the body and make up the endocannabinoid system. These receptors are best understood and have been cloned, type 1 (CB1) and type 2 (CB2) [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)] [ (1, 2)]. The CB2 receptor is located primarily in the immune system. CB1 receptors are primarily located in the nervous system with the highest concentrations in the brain and lower concentrations in the spine and peripheral nervous tissues. Cannabinoids may be promising treatments for neuropathic pain with limited evidence, whereas, the evidence for other uses is insufficient.

Minimally Invasive Treatment of Chronic Ankle Instability: a Comprehensive Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic ankle pain is a prevalent and significant cause of chronic pain. While the definition of chronic ankle pain is heterogeneous and poorly defined in the literature, systematic reviews and meta-analyses have estimated this condition to be a prevalent and debilitating source of chronic pain. The most identifiable and prominent cause of chronic ankle pain is chronic ankle instability (CAI), a condition defined by instability of the ankle-joint complex. It is a common consequence of lateral ankle sprains or ligamentous injuries and can be described as a failure of the lateral ankle joint complex after an acute, or recurring, ankle injury. The objective of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive review of CAI diagnosis and our current understanding of minimally invasive treatment options. RECENT FINDINGS: First-line treatment is conservative management, some of which includes neuromuscular rehabilitation, balance training, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), manual mobilization, ice therapy, and compression. While conservative management is effective, additional treatments for those who fail conservative management, or who seek alternative options also have been explored. Recent advances and modern techniques have expanded available treatment options, many of which are becoming less invasive, and have shown improving functionality, recovery, and patient satisfaction. Minimally invasive treatments highlighted in this review include: arthroscopic surgery, steroid injections, plasma-rich plasma injections, hyaluronic acid (HA) injections, medicinal signaling cell injections, radiofrequency therapies, and shockwave therapies. This review will discuss some of these current treatments for minimally invasive treatment of CAI, as well as suggest novel treatments for clinical trials and further investigation.

Improving labour progression among women with epidural anesthesia following use of a birthing ball: a review of recent literature.

Epidural anaesthesia is an effective form of pain relief during vaginal deliveries. However, neuraxial anaesthesia may slow the progression of labour. The assumption that epidurals lead to increased caesarean sections is also a topic of current debate. A holistic approach with the use of a birthing ball has been advocated as a potential modality to decrease labouring times and, therefore, reduce progression to caesarean section. Birthing balls aim to increase pelvic outlet opening, which facilitates labouring. Our aim is to review recent literature pertaining to birthing balls and their role in improving quality and outcomes of vaginal deliveries in patients with epidurals.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on the subject? Epidural anaesthesia may slow the progression of labour. It has been hypothesised that slowing progression of labour is associated with increased rates of vacuum and forceps delivery. Most common clinical indication for caesarean section is failure to progress during labour. Birthing Balls have been shown to quicken the progression of labour, theoretically reducing caesarean sections with those with epidurals.What do the results of the study add? Several studies have demonstrated a reduced duration of first and second stage of labour among women with epidural anaesthesia, but the existing literature is limited, and interpretation of results may be restricted by generalizability and inherent study biases. The objective of this article is to review existing literature and highlight the potential clinical utility of birthing balls in current obstetric practice.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and further research? Use of birthing balls has been advocated to decrease labouring time and therefore reduce progression to caesarean section. Larger studies or meta-analysis would be required to confirm potential benefits of birthing ball use.

Evolving Spinal Cord Stimulation Technologies and Clinical Implications in Chronic Pain Management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS), based on the gate theory of nociception, has been shown to be effective in the management of chronic pain conditions. While early-generation technology offered many patients improvement in their pain and symptoms, limitations including paresthesia, dependence on mapping, decreased chronological efficacy, and inadequate coverage left many patients with persistent pain and overt therapeutic failure. RECENT FINDINGS: New advances in neuromodulation technology circumvent many of these previous limitations and offer patients improved pain relief and quality of life. In this review, an update on recent technological developments in the field of SCS and peripheral neuromodulation is presented with discussion on differentiating characteristics which may help guide applicability to individual patient needs.

Off-label Antidepressant Use for Treatment and Management of Chronic Pain: Evolving Understanding and Comprehensive Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While clinicians have been using antidepressants for off-label indications in the treatment of chronic pain in recent years, newer studies have proven effectiveness and provided additional mechanistic understanding and defined potential adverse effects. As depression and chronic pain are frequently comorbid conditions, the use of antidepressants has allowed for treatment of both conditions concomitantly in the same patient population. RECENT FINDINGS: The most commonly used antidepressants for chronic pain are tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), though selective serotonin or noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors and other atypical antidepressants have been shown to be effective at treating chronic pain. In addition to neuropathic pain, bupropion has also demonstrated effectiveness in treating chronic pain caused by inflammatory bowel disease. Selective norepinephrine receptor inhibitors (SNRIs), including duloxetine, serve to suppress neuropathic pain by altering recovery of the noradrenergic descending inhibitory system in the spinal cord. While the direct mechanism of action is largely unknown, TCAs may suppress the noradrenergic descending inhibitory system to produce an antihyperalgesic effect. The use of antidepressants offers alternative and adjunctive therapy options for patients suffering from chronic pain from various modalities. TCAs, mono-amine oxidase inhibitors, selective serotonin receptor inhibitors, SNRIs, and atypical antidepressants have been shown to have analgesic and sometimes antiinflammatory capabilities that are independent of their mood-stabilizing effects. Further studies are warranted to establish better safety profiles and efficacy of antidepressant use in chronic pain.

An Atypical Presentation of Raynaud's Disease.

OBJECTIVE: A 57-year-old female with a 33-year history of constant hand discoloration and paronychia had undergone multiple evaluations with a failure to find a diagnosis. She continues to undergo an evolving treatment regimen and diagnostic workup in an effort to find a long-eluded diagnosis. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: She began to develop superficial ulcerations over the proximal phalanx of her fingers, often pruritic and erythematous, with pain and edema. INTERVENTION: She has since been managed with nifedipine and sildenafil and intermittent stellate ganglion blocks. CONCLUSION: Despite still lacking a formal diagnosis, her constellation of symptoms is most likely the result of an atypical presentation of Raynaud's disease.

Trends of Opioid Use Disorder Among Hospitalized Patients With Chronic Pain.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic pain treated with opioids are at an increased risk for opioid misuse or opioid use disorder (OUD). Recent years have seen a stark increase in abuse, misuse, and diversion of prescription opioid medications. The aim of this study was to investigate trends in changing rates of opioid use disorder among patients with chronic pain. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database identified chronic pain admissions with OUD from 2011 to 2015. Patients were identified from the NIS database using International Classification of Diseases (9th and 10th revisions) diagnosis codes for chronic pain and OUD. Annual estimates and trends were determined for OUD, patient characteristics, OUD among subgroups of chronic pain conditions, and discharge diagnosis. RESULTS: We identified 10.3 million patients with chronic pain. Of these, 680,631 patients were diagnosed with OUD. The number of patients with OUD increased from 109,222 in 2011 to 172,680 in 2015 (P < 0.001). Similarly, there were upward trends of OUD among females (53.2% to 54.5%; P = 0.09), patients 65 to 84 years of age (11.8% to 17%; P < 0.001), Medicare-insured patients (39.5% to 46.0%; P < 0.01), patients with low annual household incomes (27.8% to 33.3%; P < 0.001), and patients with cannabinoid use disorder (7.2% to 8.3%; P = 0.01). The prevalence of OUD increased from 2011 to 2015 in patients with chronic regional pain syndrome (5.53% to 7.46%; P = 0.01) and spondylosis (1.32% to 1.81%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the prevalence of OUD increased substantially from 2011 to 2015. Disparities of OUD with increasing opioid use among vulnerable populations including women, those with Medicare insurance, tobacco use disorder, and low annual income should be explored further.

Novel Interventional Nonopioid Therapies in Headache Management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Headaches encompass a broad-based category of a symptom of pain in the region of the head or neck. For those patients who unfortunately do not obtain relief from conservative treatment, interventional techniques have been developed and are continuing to be refined in an attempt to treat this subset of patients with the goal of return of daily activities. This investigation reviews various categories of headaches, their pathophysiology, and types of interventional treatments currently available. RECENT FINDINGS: Injection of botulinum toxin has been shown to increase the number of headache free days for patients suffering from chronic tension-type headaches. Suboccipital steroid injection has been demonstrated as a successful treatment option for patients suffering from cluster headache. Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) has been described as a treatment for all types of trigeminal autonomic cephalgias. Percutaneous ONS is a minimally invasive and reversible approach to manage occipital neuralgia performed utilizing subcutaneous electrodes placed superficial to the cervical muscular fascia in the suboccipital area. Radiofrequency lesioning is another commonly used treatment in the management of chronic pain syndromes of the head and neck. If a diagnostic sphenopalatine ganglion block successfully resolves the patient's symptoms, neurolysis can be employed as a more permanent solution. Although many patients who suffer from headaches can be treated with conservative, less-invasive treatments, there still remains at present an ever-increasing need for those patients who are refractory to conservative measures and thus require interventional treatments. These procedures are continually evolving to become safer, more precise, and more readily available for clinicians to provide to their patients.

COVID-19-Induced Changes in Photoplethysmography.

INTRODUCTION: Photoplethysmography (PPG) is the science behind many commonly used medical devices such as the pulse oximeter. PPG changes, herein as "PPG dropouts," have been described in existing in vitro studies following artificially induced clot activation. Because COVID-19 causes increased arterial, venous, and microvascular clot formation, our hypothesis is that PPG dropouts identified in vitro can also be found in vivo in patients with COVID-19. The aim of this study is to evaluate PPG recordings and D-dimer levels for patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and compare them with the PPG tracings from non-COVID controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PPG recordings were obtained for 197 ICU patients with COVID-19 and 300 non-COVID controls. PPG tracings were obtained using a TigerTech CovidPlus monitor, which received U.S. FDA emergency use authorization in March 2020 for monitoring the biometrics of patients with COVID-19 and featured unfiltered red and infrared spectrum PPG monitoring. D-dimer lab results were also recorded whenever available. RESULTS: The results demonstrated significant differences in the prevalence rate of PPG dropout among patients with COVID-19 vs. non-COVID controls. The median PPG dropout rate was 0.58 for COVID-19 patients (median 0.58, IQR 0.42-0.72, P < .05) as opposed to a median 0.0 for non-COVID patients (median 0.0, IQR 0.0-0.0, P < .05). Furthermore, at least one incidence of PPG dropout was detected in 100% of COVID-19 patients, as opposed to 2.3% of non-COVID controls (P < .05). PPG dropout also correlated closely with the normalized serum D-dimer levels taken on the same day. The change in the normalized D-dimer levels was plotted against the change in PPG dropout, and a line of best fit was created. Linear regression resulted in R2 = 0.743 (P < .05), indicating that changes in the PPG dropout rate correlate with hemorheological changes in COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: PPG dropout, like D-dimer, may not be specific for COVID-19. However, the inflammatory nature of the disease and the prevalence of prolonged ICU created a large sample size and allowed the authors to observe PPG changes in vivo in a statistically meaningful way. Further confirmatory studies are needed to confirm the potential application of PPG dropout as a measure of inflammation in other disease processes.

Review of Interventional Therapies for Refractory Pediatric Migraine.

This is a review of the latest and seminal evidence in pediatric migraine. It covers the etiology and pathophysiology known today, and then will review treatment options, efficacy and safety, quality of data and indications. Though migraine is usually regarded as an infliction in adults, it is not uncommon in the pediatric population and affects up to 8% of children. Children may experience migraine differently than adults, and present not only with headache but also frequent gastrointestinal symptoms. They are frequently shorter in duration than in adults. Traditional migraine treatment in adults is less effective in children. In this population, adjunct therapies - such as interventional techniques - should be considered when traditional treatment fails, including Botulinum Toxin A (BTA) injections, peripheral nerve and ganglion blocks. BTA injections are FDA approved for migraine prophylaxis in adults, but currently not in children; however, recent evidence shows efficacy and safety in pediatric migraine management. Nerve blocks stop nociceptive afferent fibers through injection of local anesthetics, and it may be associated with the local injection of corticosteroids. Although more common in adults, recent data suggests they are safe and effective in children and adolescents. Blocking the sphenopalatine ganglion can be achieved through nasal approach, and achieves a similar action by blocking the entire ganglion. Interventional techniques may provide a key component in the alleviation of this otherwise debilitating chronic migraine pain. Though most studies have been performed in adults, new studies provide encouraging results for treatment in children.

Airway Management for Initial PEG Insertion in the Pediatric Endoscopy Unit: A Retrospective Evaluation of 168 Patients.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placements are commonly performed pediatric endoscopic procedures. Because of underlying disease, these patients are at increased risk for airway-related complications. This study compares patient characteristics and complications following initial PEG insertion with general endotracheal anesthesia (GETA) vs. anesthesia-directed deep sedation with a natural airway (ADDS). METHODS: All patients 6 months to 18 years undergoing initial PEG insertion within the endoscopy suite were considered for inclusion in this retrospective cohort study. Selection of GETA vs. ADDS was made by the anesthesia attending after discussion with the gastroenterologist. RESULTS: This study included 168 patients (GETA n=38, ADDS n=130). Cohorts had similar characteristics with respect to sex, race, and weight. Compared to ADDS, GETA patients were younger (1.5 years vs. 2.9 years, p=0.04), had higher rates of severe American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) disease severity scores (ASA 4-5) (21% vs. 3%, p<0.001), and higher rates of cardiac comorbidities (39.5% vs. 18.5%, p=0.02). Significant associations were not observed between GETA/ADDS status and airway support, 30-day readmission, fever, or pain medication in unadjusted or adjusted models. GETA patients had significantly increased length of stay (eß=1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.11-2.18) after adjusting for ASA class, room time, anesthesia time, fever, and cardiac diagnosis. GETA patients also had increased room time (eß=1.20, 95% CI=1.08-1.33) and anesthesia time (eß=1.50, 95% CI=1.30-1.74) in adjusted models. CONCLUSION: Study results indicate that younger and higher risk patients are more likely to undergo GETA. Children selected for GETA experienced longer room times, anesthesia times, and hospital length of stay.