Local anaesthetics use does not suppress muscle activity following an ankle injection.

PURPOSE: To determine if peroneus longus (PL), peroneus brevis (PB), medial gastrocnemius (MG) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscle activation patterns during inversion perturbation and running tasks are suppressed following lidocaine injection to the anterior talofibular (ATF) and calcaneofibular (CF) ligament regions. METHODS: Fourteen recreationally active male subjects (age, 24.8 ± 2.9 years; height, 177.0 ± 6.0 cm; mass, 77.7 ± 6.7 kg) participated. Testing was performed under five injection conditions to the ATF and CF regions: 1 ml saline, 1 ml lidocaine, 3 ml saline, 3 ml lidocaine or no injection. Following injection condition, traditional ankle taping was applied. Electromyography patterns of the PL, PB, MG and TA were collected while subjects performed continuous lateral jumps on a custom-built device which elicited an ankle inversion perturbation and treadmill running (3.35 m s(-1), 0.5 % incline). RESULTS: No significant differences were demonstrated in muscle activation patterns of the PL (n.s.), PB (n.s.), MG (n.s.) or TA (n.s.) for any variable across injected conditions during both tasks. Statistical power was 0.214-0.526 for the PL, 0.087-0.638 for the PB, 0.115-0.560 for the MG and 0.118-0.410 for the TA. CONCLUSIONS: Injection of lidocaine up to 3 ml to the ATF and CF regions did not suppress muscle activity of the PL, PB, MG or TA during the inversion perturbation or running tasks. Injection up to 3 ml of 1 % lidocaine to the ATF and CF regions may be used without sacrificing the muscle activation patterns about the ankle. This finding is clinically relevant since the use of the injection does not put the patient at any higher risk of reinjury to the site.

The addition of body armor diminishes dynamic postural stability in military soldiers.

Poor postural stability has been identified as a risk factor for lower extremity musculoskeletal injury. The additional weight of body armor carried by Soldiers alters static postural stability and may predispose Soldiers to lower extremity musculoskeletal injuries. However, static postural stability tasks poorly replicate the dynamic military environment, which places considerable stress on the postural control system during tactical training and combat. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of body armor on dynamic postural stability during single-leg jump landings. Thirty-six 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) Soldiers performed single-leg jump landings in the anterior direction with and without wearing body armor. The dynamic postural stability index and the individual stability indices (medial-lateral stability index, anterior-posterior stability index, and vertical stability index) were calculated for each condition. Paired sample t-tests were performed to determine differences between conditions. Significant differences existed for the medial-lateral stability index, anterior-posterior stability index, vertical stability index, and dynamic postural stability index (p < 0.05). The addition of body armor resulted in diminished dynamic postural stability, which may result in increased lower extremity injuries. Training programs should address the altered dynamic postural stability while wearing body armor in attempts to promote adaptations that will result in safer performance during dynamic tasks.