The relation between activator and inhibitor killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors and hepatotoxicity in oncological treatment.

BACKGROUND: The molecular interactions between killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) and their related HLA class I ligands play a central role in regulating the responses of natural killer (NK) cells. Our study aim was to determine the role played by KIR genes and their HLA ligands in the genetic predisposition for the development of hepatotoxicity in children treated with chemotherapy for an oncological process. METHODS: The study group was composed of 22 children with cancer, being treated with chemotherapy at the Unit of Pediatric Oncology of the Maternity Hospital Virgen de las Nieves (Granada, Spain) and presenting signs of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Twenty-four children receiving similar treatment but presenting no signs of DILI were selected as a control group. RESULTS: The children with the KIR K2DS2 were four times more likely to have hepatotoxicity (OR=4.08, P=0.034, 95% CI: 1.1-15). The patients with 2DS2 and the C1 ligand were ten times more likely to undergo an episode of hepatotoxicity (P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: KIRs may be risk factors for susceptibility to hepatotoxicity following chemotherapy.

Venous thromboembolism in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia under chemotherapy treatment. Risk factors and usefulness of thromboprophylaxis. Results of LAL-SEHOP-PETHEMA-2013.

INTRODUCTION: Symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) is diagnosed in 3%-14% of patients during pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy. There are well-known risk factors, but the role of others as inherited thrombophilia is still controversial. Prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been described, but its use is not globally accepted. METHODS: A retrospective multicentric study in ALL patients 1-18 years old following SEHOP-PETHEMA-2013 treatment guideline was performed to evaluate VTE rate, anticoagulant treatment, outcome, risk factors, and safety and usefulness of LMWH administration as primary thromboprophylaxis in children with inherited thrombophilia. RESULTS: A total of 652 patients were included in the study. VTE incidence was 8.7%. Most of the cases occurred during induction therapy associated with central venous catheter. Univariant analysis showed that family history of thrombosis, presence of mediastinal mass, high-risk treatment group, and inherited thrombophilia were statistically significant risk factors. LMWH administration seemed to decrease VTE rate in patients with inherited thrombophilia and those with T-cell ALL phenotype. CONCLUSION: Most of the VTE cases occurred in patients without inherited thrombophilia, but when it is present, the VTE risk is higher. LMWH administration was useful to decrease VTE in these patients.