RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Lombardy region was among the areas most affected by COVID-19 infection worldwide; the Lombardy Emergency Medical System (EMS) responded immediately to this emergency. We analyzed several critical aspects to understand what occurred in that region. METHODS: This retrospective study compares the events managed by the dispatch center and the characteristics of the patients transported to the hospital -age, sex, SpO2, deaths- managed by the EMS in Brescia and Bergamo provinces between March-April 2020 and March-April 2019. Ambulances' waiting time at the hospitals before discharging patients and the patients' severity at emergency department admission were also analyzed. RESULTS: EMS managed 37,340 events in March-April 2020, +51.5% versus 2019. "Breathing" or "Infective" events reported to the dispatch center increased more than ten-fold (OR 25.1, p < 0.0001) in March 2020 and two-fold in April 2020 compared to 2019 (OR 3, p < 0.0001). Deaths increased +246% (OR 1.7, p < 0.0001), and patients not transported to hospital +481% (OR 2.9, p < 0.0001) in March 2020 compared to 2019. In some hospitals, ambulances waited more than one hour before discharging the patients, and the emergency departments doubled the admission of critically ill patients. Transported patients for "Breathing" or "Infective" events were primarily males (OR 1.5, p < 0.0001). The patients had lower SpO2 in 2020 than in 2019 and they were younger. CONCLUSIONS: The Lombardy region experienced an unexpected outbreak in an extremely short timeframe and in a limited area. The EMS coped with this pandemic, covering an extremely higher number of requests, with a ten-fold increase in the number of events managed.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Ambulancias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica , Brotes de Enfermedades , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
We report the case of a patient who presented with respiratory failure, recurrent ventricular fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias, and hypotension after an intentional ingestion of aconite flowers. Significant ingestion of this plant can produce life-threatening cardio- and neurotoxicity that may require evacuation from the wilderness to a medical facility capable of advanced treatment and intensive care monitoring.
Asunto(s)
Aconitum/efectos adversos , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiología , Intoxicación por Plantas/complicaciones , Arritmias Cardíacas/sangre , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Ingestión de Alimentos , Flores/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intoxicación por Plantas/sangre , Intoxicación por Plantas/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Hemorrhage in major trauma is life-threatening and the activation of the Massive Transfusion Protocol (MTP) was found to reduce the time to transfusion and mortality. The purpose was (i) to verify whether MTP activation identifies patients that require massive transfusions once admitted to the Emergency Department (ED), (ii) to establish whether pre-hospital MTP activation reduces the time to transfusion on arrival at the ED, (iii) to identify the variable that best predicts MTP activation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center study. The MTP was implemented at the end of 2012; it was activated for major trauma in pre-hospital setting on the basis on established criteria. Pre-hospital MTP activation aimed to make blood products available prior to the patients' arrival at the ED. The blood products are transfused when the patient arrives at the hospital. RESULTS: The MTP was activated in pre-hospital setting in 219 patients. On arrival at the hospital, the Trauma Team Leader confirmed MTP activation in 146 (66.7%) patients. Patients with MTP criteria received a higher amount of blood products than the patients without MTP criteria, median 7 (IQR 2-13) units versus 2 (0-6) units, respectively (P < 0.001). At the same time, patients with a Shock Index ≥ 0.9 received more transfusions (5.5 [2-13] units) compared with patients characterized by a lower SI (2 [0-7.25] units, P = 0.009). 146 patients were transfused in the first hour of ED admission. Poisson's multiple regression shows that the SI is the variable that better predicted MTP activation compared to age, gender and the number of injured sites. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-hospital MTP activation is useful to identify patients that require an urgent blood transfusion on arrival at the ED. Further analysis should be considered to evaluate the implementation of the Shock Index as a criterion to activate MTP.