Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Lett Appl Microbiol ; 67(1): 89-96, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29709063

RESUMEN

Previous researches have showed that Lachancea thermotolerans strains RCKT4 and RCKT5 inhibited the growth of Aspergillus. However, currently, there are no data on their nutritional preferences, as a possible substrate competitor against Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and their effects on fermentation. In this work, we observed that the biocontrol yeasts and S. cerevisiae BSc203, based on the utilization of 16 carbonate sources, revealed significant differences in the nutritional profile (biocontrol yeasts NS:0·25, BSc203 NS:0·56). Lachancea thermotolerans strains did not occupy the same niche as that of BSc203 (NOI:0·44). The biocontrol agents and BSc203 presented similar competitive attitude in terms of the sugar, ethanol and sulphite tolerances. During fermentation, the biocontrol yeasts were found to tolerate up to 12% v/v ethanol, 250 mg ml-1 of total SO2 and 30° Brix sugar. In mixed cultures, L. thermotolerans strains did not negatively affect the growth of BSc203 and the wine quality, except when RCKT4 was initially inoculated at a high proportion in the mixed culture 1MSK4 (1%BSc203/99%RCKT4), resulting in a lower production of CO2 and ethanol, in comparison with pure BSc203. RCKT5, at a high proportion, in 1MSK5 (1%BSc203/99%RCKT5) presented promising oenological properties. This fermentation showed lower acetic acid contents and higher total acidity than pure BSc203. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Generally it is not evaluated if the biofungicide yeasts sprayed on vegetables alter the quality of the fermented products. This work focused on the importance of assessing the possible effects of yeast-based fungicides used in vineyards on grape fermentation, especially on Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth. In this context, the competition between biofungicide yeasts and S. cerevisiae under winemaking conditions is investigated.


Asunto(s)
Antibiosis/fisiología , Agentes de Control Biológico/farmacología , Fermentación/efectos de los fármacos , Fungicidas Industriales/farmacología , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/crecimiento & desarrollo , Vitis/microbiología , Ácido Acético/metabolismo , Etanol/farmacología , Vino/análisis
2.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 320: 108520, 2020 May 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32035365

RESUMEN

A wide range of fresh fruits and vegetables is attacked by Penicillium species causing diseases during their postharvest handling. Many of these species are psychrotrophic and they are able to cause food spoilage at refrigeration temperature as happens with table grapes. After the harvest, grape bunches are stored inside boxes with SO2 generator pads to reduce the contamination with fungal conidia. However, SO2 residues are dangerous to people allergic to sulfites and they negatively affect the quality of fresh fruit. Biological control of phytopathogens with microbial antagonists naturally present on fruit surfaces could be helpful against postharvest diseases. The present study aimed to select native yeasts isolated from fermentation microenvironments and the surface of refrigerated grapes for their use in the biological control of P. expansum on table grapes stored in cold rooms. Non-pathogenic and pathogenic Penicillium species were isolated, and the four most aggressive pathogen isolates were identified as Penicillium expansum. Twenty yeast isolates identified as Aureobasidium pullulans, Cryptococcus magnus, Metschnikowia pulcherrima and Rhodotorula glutinis presented positive antagonistic activity against Penicillium expansum; they controlled the development of at least one of the fungi, significantly reducing the disease incidence. The results showed that three antagonistic yeasts (M. pulcherrima 22, 36 and 43) reduced the disease incidence and severity of all 4 P. expansum isolates. It was also found that the fruit surface is not the only source for isolation of biological control agents. Microenvironments with different stress conditions could be a promising source to isolate antagonistic microorganisms.


Asunto(s)
Agentes de Control Biológico , Almacenamiento de Alimentos/métodos , Penicillium/crecimiento & desarrollo , Vitis/microbiología , Levaduras/fisiología , Antibiosis , Frío , Microbiología de Alimentos , Frutas/microbiología , Levaduras/clasificación , Levaduras/aislamiento & purificación
3.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 204: 91-100, 2015 Jul 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25863340

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to determine the putative modes of action of 59 viticultural yeasts (31 Saccharomyces and 28 non-Saccharomyces) that inhibited fungi isolated from sour and grey rot in grapes. Inhibition of fungal mycelial growth by metabolites, enzyme activities (laminarinases, chitinases), antifungal volatiles, competition for nutrients (siderophores, Niche Overlap Index (NOI)), inhibition of fungal spore germination and decreased germinal tube length and induction of resistance were assayed. Biofungicide yeasts were classified into "antifungal patterns", according to their mechanisms of action. Thirty isolates presented at least two of the mechanisms assayed. We propose that inhibition of fungal mycelial growth by metabolites, laminarinases, competition for nutrients, inhibition of fungal spore germination and decreased germinal tube length, and antifungal volatiles by Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces viticultural yeasts is used as putative biocontrol mechanisms against phytopathogenic fungi. Twenty-four different antifungal patterns were identified. Siderophore production (N)and a combination of siderophore production and NOI>0.92 (M)were the most frequent antifungal patterns observed in the biofungicide yeasts assayed. Elucidation of these mechanisms could be useful for optimization of an inoculum formulation, resulting in a more consistent control of grey and sour rot with Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces biocontrol yeasts.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/farmacología , Enfermedades de las Plantas/microbiología , Enfermedades de las Plantas/prevención & control , Saccharomyces/metabolismo , Vitis/microbiología , Botrytis/efectos de los fármacos , Celulasas/metabolismo , Quitinasas/metabolismo , Micelio/efectos de los fármacos , Micelio/crecimiento & desarrollo , Saccharomyces/aislamiento & purificación , Esporas Fúngicas/efectos de los fármacos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA