Use of omalizumab for management of idiopathic anaphylaxis: A systematic review and retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Patients with idiopathic anaphylaxis (IA) may fail to respond to a combination of high-dose H1 and H2 antihistamines and mast cell stabilizers. Treatment options for these patients are currently limited. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical experience of omalizumab use for the treatment of patients with IA with no evidence of underlying clonal mast cell disorders. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review at 2 separate institutions of medical records of patients with a diagnosis of IA without evidence of mast cell clonality who had received treatment with omalizumab. We searched PubMed for studies describing omalizumab use in similar patients. Information on symptoms and omalizumab therapy was compiled, and response pattern of anaphylaxis was determined. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients with IA and no evidence of mast cell clonality who received omalizumab were identified. The median age was 36 years at the start of omalizumab (range, 11-54 years; n = 29). The frequency of anaphylaxis episodes before omalizumab treatment varied from 2 total episodes to several episodes per month. The most often used initial omalizumab dose was 300 mg every 4 weeks (n = 16). Most patients ultimately achieved clinical response after starting omalizumab: complete response (63%, n = 22), partial response (28.5%, n = 10), with 3 nonresponders. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab may be an effective treatment option for patients with IA who do not have evidence of mast cell clonality and fail to respond to antihistamines and mast cell stabilizers.

Approach to the evaluation of adverse antibiotic reactions in patients with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to antibiotics in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) are common and often mislabeled as allergies. The labeling of an antibiotic reaction as an allergy can lead to the use of antibiotics that are less efficacious, are more expensive, or have a greater risk of adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: To establish a safe approach for the evaluation of ADRs to antibiotics in patients with CF to help clarify future use of these medications. METHODS: Patients with CF whose antibiotic allergies were causing difficulty in their medical management were referred for an allergy evaluation that consisted of a thorough drug allergy history and antibiotic testing if appropriate. If the history was not consistent with a true hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) and test results were negative, the patient underwent a challenge to the offending agent(s) to rule out an HSR. Challenges were only performed if the medication was indicated for future use. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients (mean age, 32.4 years) underwent a thorough allergy evaluation. A total of 17 antibiotic challenges were performed in 11 patients without a reaction consistent with an HSR or severe delayed reaction. Only 2 medications had a history consist with an HSR, and it was recommended that they undergo a desensitization procedure if the drug was required. CONCLUSION: If treatment with appropriate antibiotics becomes difficult in patients with CF because of drug allergies, then referral to an allergist can help safely identify treatment options. Our findings suggest that a thorough evaluation by an allergy specialist can lead to more appropriate treatment options in patients with CF.

Continuous and Daily Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy: Results from a 2-Year Open-Label Follow-On Study.

BACKGROUND: The randomized, controlled PALISADE trial demonstrated the benefit of daily oral immunotherapy with Peanut (Arachis Hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp (PTAH, formerly AR101) in peanut-allergic children and adolescents. OBJECTIVE: ARC004, the open-label follow-on study to PALISADE, used 5 dosing cohorts to explore PTAH treatment beyond 1 year and alternative dosing regimens in peanut-allergic individuals. METHODS: Active arm (PTAH-continuing) PALISADE participants who tolerated 300-mg peanut protein at the exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge and placebo arm (PTAH-naive) participants could enter ARC004. PTAH-continuing participants were assigned to receive daily (cohorts 1 and 3A) or non-daily (cohorts 2, 3B, and 3C) dosing regimens; PTAH-naive participants were built up to 300 mg/d PTAH, followed by maintenance dosing. At study completion, participants underwent an exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge with doses up to 2000 mg peanut protein. Data were assessed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Overall, 358 (87.5%) eligible participants (4-17 years) entered ARC004 (PTAH-continuing, n = 256; PTAH-naive, n = 102). Among PTAH-continuing participants, exposure-adjusted adverse event rates were 12.94 to 17.54/participant-year and 25.95 to 42.49/participant-year in daily and non-daily dosing cohorts, respectively; most participants (83%) experienced mild or moderate adverse events. Daily dosing cohorts appeared to have higher desensitization rates than non-daily dosing cohorts. Of all PTAH-continuing cohorts, cohort 3A had the longest daily dosing duration and the highest desensitization rates. Changes in immune markers with PTAH continuation demonstrated ongoing immunomodulation. Outcomes in PTAH-naive participants mirrored those of the PALISADE active arm. CONCLUSIONS: Continued daily PTAH treatment beyond 1 year showed sustained safety and efficacy. Ongoing immunomodulation was observed during the second year of treatment.

Management of atrial tachycardia in the newborn with enterovirus myocarditis.

Neonatal enterovirus myocarditis is a rare but serious infection that is often an underrecognized cause of cardiovascular collapse. Enterovirus myocarditis in patients with such collapse should be suspected when signs of congestive heart failure and tachyarrhythmia are present. The majority of reported electrical disturbances associated with enterovirus myocarditis are ventricular in origin, but the infection can present as atrial tachyarrhythmia. Atrial tachyarrhythmias associated with enterovirus myocarditis are difficult to manage because of their resistance to conventional antiarrhythmic therapy. We present 2 cases of neonates with atrial tachycardia associated with enterovirus myocarditis who responded to a combination of amiodarone and flecainide.

Ambient particulate matter, C-reactive protein, and coronary artery disease.

This article is a review of the scientific literature with respect to fine particulate matter (PM), 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, and coronary artery disease (CAD). The association between air pollution and respiratory diseases has been extensively investigated for decades; however, the role of air pollution in exacerbating heart disease has only recently become a focus of attention. It has been shown that for every 10-microg/m(3) increase in fine PM in the air, there appears to be a 2.1% increase in the number of deaths related to ischemic heart disease. PM has been linked to increased levels of systemic inflammation biomarkers such as C-reactive proteins (CRP). Daily variation of ambient pollution is correlated with rises and falls in CRP levels. Increased CRP levels have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality in individuals with CAD. Seventy-five percent of patients with elevated CRP levels have reportedly experienced a major cardiac event despite low-density lipoproteins (LDL) levels that were below the threshold recommended for pharmacological intervention. HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) have been shown to cause a reduction in coronary events by lowering LDL levels. However, recently it has been shown that statins have the effect of lowering CRP levels. This may explain why individuals with normal lipid levels may benefit from statin therapy. Ambient PM exposure levels and its effects on CRP are risk factors associated with coronary events and should be considered as a target for the treatment of CAD.