Prevalence, risk factors and impact of delirium in adult inpatients in a tertiary care hospital: A point prevalence study.

AIMS: To describe the point prevalence, risk factors and possible outcomes of delirium in inpatients. DESIGN: A cross-sectional point prevalence study. BACKGROUND: Delirium is an acute brain syndrome that negatively affects patients, healthcare professionals and institutions alike; it is common in inpatient settings and is preventable in about one third of cases. Although guidelines recommend systematic screening and assessment, delirium is often unrecognised, undiagnosed and uncoded. There is a lack of valid data on this patient safety indicator in German-speaking countries. METHODS: The study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Switzerland on 5 July 2022. Specially trained registered nurses collected data from all patients meeting the inclusion criteria using CAM, ICDSC or mCAM-ED. Data were analysed descriptively with stratification by delirium status, setting and surgery. RESULTS: The point prevalence across all settings was 6.9% (27/390), with large variation between settings: ICU 28.6% (4/14), IMC 28.0% (7/25), wards 4.6% (15/326) and ED 4% (1/25). Surgical patients were almost twice as likely to be affected as medical patients (8.9% vs. 4.8%). Patients with delirium differed most clearly from those without by having a larger number of ICD-10 F-diagnoses, a larger number of medications and higher age, which are known risk factors. Moreover, those with delirium had more missed diagnoses, increased mortality, more adverse events and higher costs. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of patients experienced delirium and adverse clinical outcomes. Missed delirium diagnoses may further jeopardise patient safety and result in lost revenue. It remains unclear to what extent the risk factors and effects of delirium are causal and what determinants underlie missed diagnoses. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Consistent identification of high-risk patients and treatment settings with elevated risk, accompanied by the implementation of effective preventive and management strategies, is critical to addressing delirium.

Mapping advanced practice nurses' scope of practice, satisfaction, and drivers of role performance.

Background: Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) roles in Switzerland include Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS), Nurse Practitioner (NP) and blended roles. The variety contributes to unclear profiles and scope of practice. Aim: To describe a) the performance of APN tasks according to Hamric's competencies, b) job satisfaction, and c) barriers and facilitators to role performance. Methods: Nationwide cross-sectional survey among clinically working APNs. Inclusion criteria: academic degree, role with advanced nursing competency. Analysis of quantitative and qualitative data using inferential statistics and content analysis. Results: Of the 222 APNs, 49% (n = 108) described themselves as CNSs, 37% (n = 81) as working in a blended role, and 15% (n = 33) as NP. APNs provided the greatest proportion of their tasks in the competency direct clinical practice and the least in ethical decision-making. Group comparisons between roles revealed significant differences in the competencies: direct clinical practice, guidance and coaching, leadership, and evidence-based practice. Job satisfaction was high (76%, n = 165), most often described by the category work content/role (e.g., defined scope of practice). The most frequent barrier to role performance was the category scope of practice (e.g., unclear responsibilities); the most frequent facilitator was the category professional recognition (e.g., respect). Conclusion: The study highlights current APN scope of practice and can support the advancement of the role through clinical practice, educational institutions, and research.

Nurse-patient interaction during the Covid-19 pandemic: Creating and maintaining an interactive space for care.

AIMS: To explore nurse-patient interactions during the Covid-19 pandemic from both nurses' and patients' perspectives. DESIGN: Qualitative study using constructive grounded theory. METHODS: A total of 34 patients and 49 nurses from acute and home care settings participated in individual or focus group interviews between December 2020 and May 2021. Data were analysed by a team of researchers using coding, memo-writing, theoretical sampling and constant comparison and integration. RESULTS: We identified the creation and maintenance of an interactive space as the main social process. This interactive space was shaped by the care context and the course of the pandemic. For nurses, four factors were key, namely protecting oneself and others, navigating communication barriers, adapting nursing actions to the evolving situation, and providing emotional care work. Patients experienced attentive caring relationships with nurses and felt that, for the most part, their individual needs had been met despite the pandemic challenges. CONCLUSION: Nurses and patients created an interactive space in which they were able to provide and receive the necessary care. Maintaining the interactive space was often challenging, and required an intentional effort by nurses, particularly in acute care settings. The findings illustrate that nurses ensured the provision of necessary care even during a public health crisis, thereby enabling patient access to good quality care. IMPACT: Nurse-patient relationships are important for effective, person-centred care delivery. Despite the pandemic challenges, nurses managed to uphold their caring imperative and ensure quality care. Findings provide further insights on the importance of nurse-patient interaction in maintaining quality care. They inform models of nursing care delivery and strategies to support quality care during public health crises.

Validation of the newly developed Advanced Practice Nurse Task Questionnaire: A national survey.

AIM: To describe psychometric validation of the newly developed Advanced Practice Nurse Task Questionnaire. DESIGN: Cross-sectional quantitative study. METHODS: The development of the questionnaire followed an adapted version of the seven steps described in the guide by the Association for Medical Education in Europe. A nationwide online survey tested the construct and structural validity and internal consistency using an exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and a Kruskal-Wallis test to compare the hypotheses. RESULTS: We received 222 questionnaires between January and September 2020. The factor analysis produced a seven-factor solution as suggested in Hamric's model. However, not all item loadings aligned with the framework's competencies. Cronbach's alpha of factors ranged between .795 and .879. The analysis confirmed the construct validity of the Advanced Practice Nurse Task Questionnaire. The tool was able to discriminate the competencies of guidance and coaching, direct clinical practice and leadership across the three advanced practice nurse roles clinical nurse specialist, nurse practitioner or blended role. CONCLUSION: A precise assessment of advanced practice nurse tasks is crucial in clinical practice and in research as it may be a basis for further refinement, implementation and evaluation of roles. IMPACT: The Advanced Practice Nurse Task Questionnaire is the first valid tool to assess tasks according to Hamric's model of competencies independently of the role or the setting. Additionally, it distinguishes the most common advanced practice nurse roles according to the degree of tasks in direct clinical practice and leadership. The tool may be applied in various countries, independent of the degree of implementation and understanding of advanced nursing practice. REPORTING METHOD: The STARD 2015 guideline was used to report the study. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Participatory development and implementation of a dementia care pathway with intervention bundles in acute care during the coronavirus pandemic: A process evaluation study.

AIMS: To explore the implementation of a dementia care pathway in an acute care setting. BACKGROUND: Dementia care in acute settings is often constrained by contextual factors. We developed an evidence-based care pathway with intervention bundles, and implemented it on two trauma units, with the aim to empower staff and improve quality care. DESIGN: Process evaluation using quantitative and qualitative methods. METHODS: Pre-implementation, unit staff completed a survey (n = 72) assessing family and dementia care skills and level of evidence-based dementia care. Post-implementation, champions (n = 7) completed the same survey, with additional questions on acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility, and participated in a focus group interview. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). REPORTING GUIDELINE: Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research Checklist. RESULTS: Pre-implementation, staff's perceived skills in family and dementia care were moderate overall, with high skills in 'building relationships' and 'sustaining personhood'. Evidence-based interventions were delivered seldom to frequent, with 'individualized care' scoring lowest and 'assessing cognition' scoring highest. Implementation of the care pathway/intervention bundles was overshadowed by the pandemic, and failed due to major organisational- and process-related barriers. Acceptability scored highest and feasibility lowest, with concerns relating to complexity and compatibility of pathways/bundles when introduced into clinical routines. CONCLUSIONS: Our study implies that organisational and process factors are the most influential determinants to the implementation of dementia care in acute settings. Future implementation efforts should draw on the evolving evidence within implementation science and dementia care research to ensure effective integration and improvement process. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Our study provides important learning around improving care for persons with dementia and their families in hospitals. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A family caregiver was involved in the development of the education and training programme.

Development of health care workers' mental health during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Switzerland: two cross-sectional studies.

BACKGROUND: Virus outbreaks such as the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic are challenging for health care workers (HCWs), affecting their workload and their mental health. Since both, workload and HCW's well-being are related to the quality of care, continuous monitoring of working hours and indicators of mental health in HCWs is of relevance during the current pandemic. The existing investigations, however, have been limited to a single study period. We examined changes in working hours and mental health in Swiss HCWs at the height of the pandemic (T1) and again after its flattening (T2). METHODS: We conducted two cross-sectional online studies among Swiss HCWs assessing working hours, depression, anxiety, and burnout. From each study, 812 demographics-matched participants were included into the analysis. Working hours and mental health were compared between the two samples. RESULTS: Compared to prior to the pandemic, the share of participants working less hours was the same in both samples, whereas the share of those working more hours was lower in the T2 sample. The level of depression did not differ between the samples. In the T2 sample, participants reported more anxiety, however, this difference was below the minimal clinically important difference. Levels of burnout were slightly higher in the T2 sample. CONCLUSIONS: Two weeks after the health care system started to transition back to normal operations, HCWs' working hours still differed from their regular hours in non-pandemic times. Overall anxiety and depression among HCWs did not change substantially over the course of the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

[Differences in epaAC© in heart failure patients with or without readmission: a retrospective case-control study]. / Unterschiede im epaAC© bei Patient_innen mit Herzinsuffizienz mit oder ohne Rehospitalisation.

Differences in epaAC© in heart failure patients with or without readmission: A retrospective case-control study Abstract. Background: Heart failure is one of the most frequent reasons for hospitalization in elderly people. In heart failure, approximately 22.8 % of hospitalised patients are rehospitalised within 30 days. The nursing assessment tool epaAC could provide information on risk factors for readmission. Aim: The aim of this study was to identify possible group differences in the items and scores of the epaAC discharge assessment with regard to the endpoint of unplanned readmissions within 30 days after discharge from index-hospitalisation. Methods: Using a retrospective case-control design, differences in the epaAC variables were investigated by descriptive and comparative statistics. Chi-square test, Wilcoxon test and t-test were performed with two-sided alpha level α < 0.05. Alpha error accumulation was accounted for by Benjamini & Hochberg correction. Results: No significant group differences were found in all items and scores of the discharge epaAC. There is only weak evidence that the presence of acute respiratory impairment at time of discharge is higher in the patient with rehospitalisation than in those without rehospitalisation. Conclusions: The items and scores of the nursing assessment instrument epaAC did not significantly differ between patients with or without 30-days readmission. Further exploration to assess the epaAC's potential to predict rehospitalisation in heart failure is needed.

The prevalence rates and adversities of delirium: Too common and disadvantageous.

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence rates and adversities of delirium have not yet been systematically evaluated and are based on selected populations, limited sample sizes, and pooled studies. Therefore, this study assesses the prevalence rates and outcome of and odds ratios for managing services for delirium. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) 5, the Delirium Observation Screening (DOS) scale, and the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) construct, 28,118 patients from 35 managing services were included, and the prevalence rates and adverse outcomes were determined by simple logistic regressions and their corresponding odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: Delirious patients were older, admitted from institutions (OR 3.44-5.2), admitted as emergencies (OR 1.87), hospitalized twice longer, and discharged, transferred to institutions (OR 5.47-6.6) rather than home (OR 0.1), or deceased (OR 43.88). The rate of undiagnosed delirium was 84.2%. The highest prevalence rates were recorded in the intensive care units (47.1-84.2%, pooled 67.9%); in the majority of medical services, rates ranged from 20% to 40% (pooled 26.2%), except, at both ends, palliative care (55.9%), endocrinology (8%), and rheumatology (4.4%). Conversely, in surgery and its related services, prevalence rates were lower (pooled 13.1%), except for cardio- and neurosurgical services (53.3% and 46.4%); the lowest prevalence rate was recorded in obstetrics (2%). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Delirium remains underdiagnosed, and novel screening approaches are required. Furthermore, this study identified the impact of delirium on patients, determined the prevalence rates for 32 services, and elucidated the association between individual services and delirium.

Impact of a nurse-led family support intervention on family members' satisfaction with intensive care and psychological wellbeing: A mixed-methods evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Families of critically ill persons face uncertainty and experience distress during and after their close other's stay in an intensive care unit (ICU). Proactive nurse engagement and support is recommended to meet families' needs in the ICU, but little is known about its impact on quality of family care. We introduced a family support intervention that consisted of an interprofessional family support pathway and a new role of an advanced practice family nurse. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to examine the effect of an advanced practice nurse-led family support intervention on family members' satisfaction, wellbeing, and psychological distress. METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental before-and-after study with embedded qualitative interviews in a Swiss University Hospital from March 2018 to July 2019 using a questionnaire (Family Satisfaction in the ICU-24 Survey, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Impact of Event Scale-Revised-6) and qualitative interviews (n = 19) after patient discharge. RESULTS: Families in the intervention group (n = 75) showed a trend for increased overall satisfaction (difference of 5.544, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.11 to 11.20), a statistically significant increase in satisfaction with decision-making (7.258, 95% CI: 0.89 to 13.63), and a nonsignificant increase in satisfaction with care (4.178, 95% CI: -1.53 to 9.89). Psychological distress was higher in the intervention group, with depression reaching statistical significance (difference of 1.706, 95% CI: 0.16 to 3.25), which may be explained by longer ICU stays and higher proportion of deaths in the intervention group. Families receiving the intervention reported to be feeling cared for, well informed, and better able to cope. Data integration suggests that early onset, fit to need, and quality of intervention were the most important intervention characteristics impacting family wellbeing. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that family members experience a nurse-led support intervention as beneficial for their wellbeing. It increased their satisfaction, but was unable to demonstrate a favourable impact on psychological distress.

Hospital-based bereavement care provision: A cross-sectional survey with health professionals.

BACKGROUND: An in-hospital death is a profound experience for those left behind and has been associated with family members' psychological morbidity. Supporting bereaved family members is an essential part of end-of-life care and includes attentive presence, information-giving, and emotional and practical support. The actual adoption of hospital-based bereavement care, however, remains little understood. AIM: To investigate hospital-based bereavement care provision and associated barriers. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey using an online questionnaire. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Health professionals (n = 196) from two University-affiliated acute and psychiatric hospitals in Switzerland. RESULTS: The most frequent bereavement services (⩾40%) were viewing the deceased, giving information on available support, and making referrals; the most often named barriers were lack of time and organizational support. Acute care health professionals faced statistically significant more structural barriers (55.1% vs 21.4% lack of time, 47.8% vs 25.9% lack of organizational support) and felt insufficiently trained (38.4% vs 20.7%) compared to mental health professionals (p ⩽ 0.05). Nurses provided more immediate services compared to physicians, such as viewing the deceased (71.3% vs 49.0%) and sending sympathy cards (37.4% vs 16.3%) (p ⩽ 0.01). In contrast, physicians screened more often for complex bereavement disorders (10.2% vs 2.6%) and appraised bereavement care as beyond their role (26.5% vs 7.8%) (p ⩽ 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study indicates that many barriers to bereavement care exist in hospitals. More research is required to better understand enabling and limiting factors to bereavement care provision. A guideline-driven approach to hospital-based bereavement care that defines best practice and required organizational support seems necessary to ensure needs-based bereavement care.

Acute care delivery to persons with cognitive impairment: a mixed method study of health professionals' care provision and associated challenges.

Objectives: Cognitive impairment is common among older persons admitted to hospital and associated with adverse outcomes. Inadequate care has been widely reported, with health professionals tending to be ill-equipped to meet the specific needs of this patient group. This study aimed to investigate health professionals' care provision to persons with cognitive impairment and associated challenges.Design and Setting: A concurrent, cross-sectional mixed method study was conducted at two university-affiliated hospitals.Participants: A total of 339 health professionals participated in the study.Measurements: An online survey (n = 312) determined the extent to which health professionals perceived their care provision to be person-centered and evidence-based (POPAC-R), and experience distress in looking after this patient group (NPI-D). Four focus group interviews (n = 27) explored health professionals' experience of care provision.Results: More than half of the health professionals reported to act always or very frequently in person-centered and evidence-based ways, and two third experienced challenging behaviors as moderately to very distressing. Health professionals working in acute geriatric wards demonstrated statistically significant higher levels of person-centered and evidence-based care provision, and lower distress. Their caring practices pertained to building a relationship, addressing specific needs, involving family members, and working collaboratively.Conclusions: Findings suggest that geriatric models of care delivery support staff in meeting the needs of persons with cognitive impairment. Health professionals require an acute care culture that values relational, collaborative and coordinated care as essential to patient safety and quality of care, and supports the consistent implementation of evidence-based practices for this patient group.

Capturing interprofessional collaboration between physicians and nurses in an acute care setting. A validation study of the revised German version of the Collaborative Practice Scales.

The relevance of interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is widely acknowledged. Given the lack of a fully validated instrument in the German language for measuring the level of IPC, we built upon the current, albeit psychometrically weak, German-language version of the instrument to devise a new version with improved wording and for subsequent psychometric testing. In a tertiary hospital in German-speaking Switzerland, 160 physicians and 374 nurses completed the revised Collaborative Practice Scales in German (CPS-G) and additional scales regarding positive and negative activation at work and regarding job demands and job resources. A confirmatory factor analysis of the CPS-G was performed, and internal consistency estimates were computed. Partial correlations between the CPS-G and the additional scales were examined for criterion validity. The model fit of the CPS-G was good for physicians (χ2/df = 2.38, p < .001; CFI = .923; RMSEA = .051, 90%-CI (0.037-0.065)) and moderate for nurses (χ2/df = 5, p < .001; CFI = .919; RMSEA = .087, 90%-CI (0.072-0.102)) supporting the two-factor structure of the original English version. Reliability was acceptable in all sub-scales for physicians (inclusion, α = 0.79; consensus, α = 0.80) and nurses (assertiveness, α = 0.77; understanding α = 0.82). As expected, the CPS-G physicians' subscales correlated positively with positive activation and job resources and negatively with negative activation and job demands, albeit not always statistically significantly. Similar correlations were found with the CPS-G nurses' subscales other than in one instance. The CPS-G showed good construct and criterion validity and acceptable internal consistency. It consequently represents a valid instrument ready for application to measure the level of interprofessional collaboration between nurses and physicians in acute care settings.

The utility of nursing instruments for daily screening for delirium: Delirium causes substantial functional impairment.

OBJECTIVE: Nursing assessments have been recommended for the daily screening for delirium; however, the utility of individual items have not yet been tested. In a first step in establishing the potential of the electronic Patient Assessment-Acute Care (ePA-AC) as such, the impact of delirium on the functional domains was assessed. METHOD: In this prospective observational cohort study, 277 patients were assessed and 118 patients were delirious. The impact of delirium on functional domains of the ePA-AC related to self-initiated activity, nutrition, and elimination was determined with simple logistic regressions. RESULTS: Patients with delirium were older, sicker, were more commonly sedated during the assessment, stayed longer in the intensive care unit (ICU) and floors, and less commonly discharged home. A general pattern was the loss of abilities and full functioning equivalent to global impairment. For self-initiated mobility, in and out of the bed sizable limitations were noted and substantial inability to transfer caused friction and shearing. Similarly, any exhaustion and fatigue were associated with delirium. For self-initiated grooming and dressing, the impairment was greater in the upper body. Within the nutritional domain, delirium affected self-initiated eating and drinking, the amount of food and fluids, energy and nutrient, as well as parenteral nutrition requirement. In delirious patients, the fluid demand was rather increased than decreased, tube feeding more often required and dysphagia occurred. For the elimination domain, urination was not affected - of note, most patients were catheterized, whereas abilities to initiate or control defecation were affected. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Delirium was associated with sizable impairment in the level of functioning. These impairments could guide supportive interventions for delirious patients and perspectively implement nursing instruments for delirium screening.

Implementing Family Systems Care Through an Educational Intervention With Nurses and Midwives in Obstetrics and Gynecological Care: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.

This mixed-methods study examined Family Systems Care (FSC) implementation through a 1-day educational session combined with 4 months of guided application of FSC knowledge and skills in obstetrics and gynecology settings. Nurses and midwives' (n = 47) attitudes toward families and their practice skills with families were assessed before the educational intervention began (Time 0), after the completion of the 1-day educational session (Time 1), and after 4 months of the FSC guided implementation phase that included coaching and mentoring (Time 2). Four focus groups with the nurses and midwives explored their FSC implementation experiences. Participants reported an initial drive to implement FSC, which faltered over time. A perceived fit to the needs of families in obstetrics and gynecology, a supportive context, and facilitated learning on the units promoted FSC uptake. Participants understood FSC as: (a) involving family members in care, a practice they felt confident about; (b) assessing families' situations, needs, concerns, which were practices that were new and stressful; and (c) offering family nursing interventions, which they felt insufficiently prepared for. Practice skills in FSC increased after the 1-day educational session but decreased to baseline after the FSC guided implementation phase. Attitudes of the nurses and midwives toward the families did not change. Following the education and guided implementation, participants' ability to work with families in a relational, systemic way could not be fully established or sustained.

[Patients with psychiatric comorbidities in the acute hospital - a field of tension with interprofessional need for action - results from a pilot study]. / Patientinnen und Patienten mit psychiatrischen Komorbiditäten im Akutspital.

Patients with psychiatric comorbidities in the acute hospital - a field of tension with interprofessional need for action - results from a pilot study Abstract. Background: Psychiatric comorbidities are frequent in patients hospitalized in an acute care hospital. They often remain undetected or, if diagnosed, neglected. As long as the somatic disease can be properly cared for and treated, this usually remains unproblematic. However, the situation can quickly tip over if psychiatric comorbidities interfere with care and treatment leading to a higher level of care and adverse consequences for patients. Aim: We investigated the need for action for this patient group from the nurses' perspective in a Swiss-German university hospital. Method: In two group discussions, nurses described intense situations, followed by an evaluation of determining factors, insights gained and measures taken to control these situations and prevent them. Results: Nurses experience the described situations as stressful and express a great need for action for themselves and for the interprofessional team. Key points are vigilance in everyday clinical practice, specific knowledge acquisition and an easily accessible local support system. Conclusions: In an acute care hospital, psychiatric comorbidities must be taken into account. However, this requires advanced skills and an organizational, interprofessional approach.

Gesundheitsverhalten und Bedürfnisse von Menschen mit COPD während der COVID-19-Pandemie - Eine Dokumentenanalyse.

Health behaviours and needs of people with COPD during COVID-19 pandemic: a document analysis Abstract. Background: The government's guidelines affected people with COPD on different levels during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to belonging to a group of particularly vulnerable persons, they had to adapt their health behaviours, in particular physical activity, to recommendations provided in order to prevent negative effects on disease progression. There is little knowledge regarding how this group of patients coped with these challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To describe the health behaviours and needs people with COPD convey during nursing phone consultations and which nursing interventions have been carried out. METHODS: A document analysis of 50 nursing phone consultations was performed. The data were summarised descriptively and analysed thematically. RESULTS: The main topics were the adaptation of physical activity, the implementation of the recommendations to the individual life situation, the detection of a COVID-19 infection and questions concerning the planning of medical appointments. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic poses additional challenges to the disease management of people with COPD. The increased need for care brought on by the pandemic was able to be met by the knowledge provided in the nursing phone consultations. What remains to be established is what role the consultations play in a sustainable change in behaviour and in dealing with negative emotions.

The TransFLUas influenza transmission study in acute healthcare - recruitment rates and protocol adherence in healthcare workers and inpatients.

BACKGROUND: Detailed knowledge about viral respiratory disease transmission dynamics within healthcare institutions is essential for effective infection control policy and practice. In the quest to study viral transmission pathways, we aimed to investigate recruitment rates and adherence of healthcare workers (HCWs) and hospital inpatients with a study protocol that involves prospective surveillance based on daily mid-turbinate nasal swabs and illness diaries. METHODS: Single center prospective surveillance of patients and HCWs in three different hospital departments of a tertiary care center during an entire influenza season in Switzerland. Inpatients and acute care HCWs were asked to provide mid-turbinate nasal swabs and illness diaries on a daily basis. Study protocol adherence and recruitment rates were the primary outcomes of interest. RESULTS: A total 251 participants (59 (23.5%) health care workers and 192 (76.5%) inpatients) were recruited from three different hospital wards. Recruitment rates differed between HCWs (62.1% of eligible HCWs) and inpatients (32.5%; P < 0.001), but not within HCWs (P = 0.185) or inpatients (P = 0.301) of the three departments. The total number of study-days was 7874; 2321 (29.5%) for inpatients and 5553 (70.5%) for HCWs. HCWs were followed for a median of 96 days (range, 71-96 days) and inpatients for 8 days (range, 3-77 days). HCWs provided swabs on 73% (range, 0-100%) of study days, and diaries on 77% (range 0-100%). Inpatients provided swabs and diaries for 83% (range, 0-100%) of days in hospital. In HCWs, increasing age, working in internal medicine and longer duration of total study participation were positively associated with the proportion of swabs and diaries collected. Adherence to the study protocol was significantly lower in physicians as compared to nurses for both swabs (P = 0.042) and diaries (P = 0.033). In inpatients, no association between demographic factors and adherence was detected. Conclusions Prospective surveillance of respiratory viral disease was feasible in a cohort of inpatients and HCWs over an entire influenza season, both in terms of recruitment rates and adherence to a study protocol that included daily specimen collection and illness diaries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02478905 . Date of registration June 23, 2015.

Adaption, benefit and quality of care associated with primary nursing in an acute inpatient setting: A cross-sectional descriptive study.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the adoption of primary nursing and to determine the quality of primary nurse-led care in an acute inpatient setting. DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional study. METHODS: Participants included inpatients (N = 369) and nurses (N = 381). To assess adoption of primary nursing, patient records were analysed and an online survey of nurses was conducted from May-June 2017. To measure quality of nursing care, a structured questionnaire was administered to inpatients. RESULTS: Patients reported high quality of individualized, responsive and proficient care, but lower levels of coordinated care. Most nurses agreed that primary nursing is beneficial for person-centred caring. However, only two-thirds found that it was practiced on their unit and only half of care planning activities were attributable to primary nurses. CONCLUSION: While perceived as beneficial, adoption of primary nursing in clinical practice remains partial. Hence, primary nursing may not be enough to ensure continuity and coordination of acute care.

Safe swallowing and communicating for ventilated intensive care patients with tracheostoma: implementation of the Passy Muir speaking valve / Sicheres Sprechen und Schlucken bei tracheotomierten, beatmeten Patientinnen und Patienten auf der Intensivstation: Implementierung des Passy Muir Sprechventils

Background: Between 4 to 45 % of intensive care patients suffer from prolonged ventilator dependence. Due to impeded weaning, verbal communication is impossible. The tracheal cannula affects breathing and swallowing. The Passy Muir speaking valve (PMV) allows patients on ventilators to speak. It counteracts pharyngeal as well as laryngeal desensitization and prevents an insufficient swallowing reflex. Aim and methods: To implement the PMV, we conducted a multiprofessional practice- and quality development project. The objective was to ensure safe swallowing and communicating for ventilated patients with tracheostoma. Results: Intensive care nurses, doctors and physiotherapists assessed patient safety as being high. In nine patients with 51 PMV applications, we observed three undesirable events in terms of dyspnea and oxygen desaturation. On one occasion, it was necessary to remove the PMV. Conclusion: A combination of mandatory training for the entire treatment team, presence of two professionals during PMV application, and a newly developed guiding document resulted in a high level of patient safety. By means of PMV, ventilated intensive care patients are able to communicate verbally and to swallow better. Complications can be identified early and solved effectively.

[Support of the nursing process through electronic nursing documentation systems (UEPD) ­ Initial validation of an instrument]. / Unterstützung des Pflegeprozesses durch die elektronische Pflegeprozessdokumentation (UEPD). Erste Validierung eines Messinstruments.

BACKGROUND: Electronic nursing documentation systems, with standardized nursing terminology, are IT-based systems for recording the nursing processes. These systems have the potential to improve the documentation of the nursing process and to support nurses in care delivery. AIM: This article describes the development and initial validation of an instrument (known by its German acronym UEPD) to measure the subjectively-perceived benefits of an electronic nursing documentation system in care delivery. METHOD: The validity of the UEPD was examined by means of an evaluation study carried out in an acute care hospital (n = 94 nurses) in German-speaking Switzerland. Construct validity was analyzed by principal components analysis. RESULTS: Initial references of validity of the UEPD could be verified. The analysis showed a stable four factor model (FS = 0.89) scoring in 25 items. All factors loaded ≥ 0.50 and the scales demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.73 ­ 0.90). Principal component analysis revealed four dimensions of support: establishing nursing diagnosis and goals; recording a case history/an assessment and documenting the nursing process; implementation and evaluation as well as information exchange. CONCLUSIONS: Further testing with larger control samples and with different electronic documentation systems are needed. Another potential direction would be to employ the UEPD in a comparison of various electronic documentation systems.