RESUMEN
Levels of adherence to HIV treatment are lower among adolescents compared with older and younger individuals receiving similar therapies. We purposely sampled the most and least adherent adolescents from a 300-adolescent longitudinal HIV treatment adherence study in Gaborone, Botswana. Multiple objective and subjective measures of adherence were available and study participants were selected based on sustained patterns of either excellent or poor adherence over a one-year period. Focus group discussions (FGD) and in-depth interviews (IDI) were conducted with the adolescents and a subset of their caregivers with the goal of revealing barriers and facilitators of adherence. Focus groups were segregated by adherence classification of the participants. Following coding of transcripts, matrices were developed based on participants' adherence classifications in order to clarify differences in themes generated by individuals with different adherence characteristics. 47 adolescents and 25 adults were included. The non-adherent adolescents were older than the adherent adolescents (median age 18 years (IQR 16-19) vs. 14 years (IQR 12-15 years)), with median time on treatment near 10 years in both groups. Interference with daily activities, concerns about stigma and discrimination, side effects, denial of HIV status, and food insecurity arose as challenges to adherence among both those who were consistently adherent and those who were poorly-adherent to their medications. Low outcome expectancy, treatment fatigue, mental health and substance use problems, and mismatches between desired and received social support were discussed only among poorly adherent adolescents and their caregivers. Challenges raised only among adolescents and caregivers in the non-adherent groups are hypothesis-generating, identifying areas that may have a greater contribution to poor outcomes than challenges faced by both adherent and non-adherent adolescents. The contribution of these factors to poor outcomes should be explored in future studies.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Antirretroviral Altamente Activa/psicología , Discriminación en Psicología , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/psicología , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estigma Social , Adolescente , Botswana , Cuidadores , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Infecciones por VIH/psicología , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Manejo del Dolor , Pobreza , Apoyo Social , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Background: Here, we describe how the Collaborative African Genomics Network ( CAfGEN) of the Human Heredity and Health in Africa (H3Africa) consortium is using genomics to probe host genetic factors important to the progression of HIV and HIV-tuberculosis (TB) coinfection in sub-Saharan Africa. The H3Africa was conceived to facilitate the application of genomics technologies to improve health across Africa.. Methods: CAfGEN is an H3Africa collaborative centre comprising expertise from the University of Botswana; Makerere University; Baylor College of Medicine Children's Clinical Centers of Excellence (COEs) in Botswana, Uganda, and Swaziland; as well as Baylor College of Medicine, Texas. The COEs provide clinical expertise for community engagement, participant recruitment and sample collection while the three University settings facilitate processing and management of genomic samples and provide infrastructure and training opportunities to sustain genomics research. Results: The project has focused on utilizing whole-exome sequencing to identify genetic variants contributing to extreme HIV disease progression phenotypes in children, as well as RNA sequencing and integrated genomics to identify host genetic factors associated with TB disease progression among HIV-positive children. These cohorts, developed using the COEs' electronic medical records, are exceptionally well-phenotyped and present an unprecedented opportunity to assess genetic factors in individuals whose HIV was acquired by a different route than their adult counterparts in the context of a unique clinical course and disease pathophysiology. Conclusions: Our approach offers the prospect of developing a critical mass of well-trained, highly-skilled, continent-based African genomic scientists. To ensure long term genomics research sustainability in Africa, CAfGEN contributes to a wide range of genomics capacity and infrastructure development on the continent, has laid a foundation for genomics graduate programs at its institutions, and continues to actively promote genomics research through innovative forms of community engagement brokered by partnerships with governments and academia to support genomics policy formulation.