RESUMEN
Studies conducted to support registration or approval of veterinary anthelmintics generally follow study design recommendations provided by the VICH (International Cooperation on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Veterinary Medicinal Products), "Efficacy of Anthelmintics: General Requirements" (VICH GL7). For dose confirmation studies, VICH GL7 provides recommendations for determining that the control animals had an adequate infection "to permit the appropriate standards of efficacy to be met with acceptable statistical and biological certitude/confidence." In the simulation studies described in this report, we investigated the performance of one method, the statistical criterion given in Section 4.5 of VICH GL7, for evaluating the adequacy of infection in anthelmintic studies, in combination with the conventional criterion of a minimum of six adequately infected animals. We conducted numerical simulations, based on parasite data from previously conducted dose confirmation studies in dogs and cattle, to investigate how the statistical criterion impacts adequacy of infection determinations when used with the conventional criterion at various sample sizes. Simulation studies in common nematode species in both dogs and cattle indicated that under certain circumstances the statistical criterion can guard against overinterpreting the evaluation of adequacy of infection as sample size is increased. However, the statistical criterion may be overly restrictive for samples with adequate infection but containing multiple zero parasite counts and adding it to the conventional criterion does not provide any additional benefit when the sample contains no zero counts. It is important for investigators designing efficacy studies to understand the potential impact this criterion may have when establishing adequacy of infection criteria in study protocols.