Evidence-based consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of erythropoietic protoporphyria and X-linked protoporphyria.

Erythropoietic protoporphyria and X-linked protoporphyria are rare genetic photodermatoses. Limited expertise with these disorders among physicians leads to diagnostic delays. Here, we present evidence-based consensus guidelines for the diagnosis, monitoring, and management of erythropoietic protoporphyria and X-linked protoporphyria. A systematic literature review was conducted, and reviewed among subcommittees of experts, divided by topic. Consensus on guidelines was reached within each subcommittee and then among all members of the committee. The appropriate biochemical and genetic testing to establish the diagnosis is reviewed in addition to the interpretation of results. Prevention of symptoms, management of acute phototoxicity, and pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment options are discussed. The importance of ongoing monitoring for liver disease, iron deficiency, and vitamin D deficiency is discussed with management guidance. Finally, management of pregnancy and surgery and the safety of other therapies are summarized. We emphasize that these are multisystemic disorders that require longitudinal monitoring. These guidelines provide a structure for evidence-based diagnosis and management for practicing physicians. Early diagnosis and management of these disorders are essential, particularly given the availability of new and emerging therapies.

Burden, clinical features and outcomes of post-tuberculosis lung disease in sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Tuberculosis (TB) is significantly associated with multiple postinfectious, non-communicable diseases after microbiological cure. For example, those with a history of TB disease have a higher risk of developing chronic lung diseases at a younger age. However, the extent and nature of post-TB complications are not well described. Here, we present a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis, which aims to synthesise literature on the burden of post-TB lung disease (PTLD) in sub-Saharan Africa, describe phenotypes, long-term outcomes and the health-related quality of life of people with PTLD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic search will be conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, African Journals Online and the Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews. Papers published in English and French languages that report the prevalence, clinical features, quality of life and long-term outcomes of people with PTLD in sub-Saharan Africa will be considered. We will assess and critically appraise the methodological quality of all studies using the modified covidence. Qualitative and quantitative (network and meta-analysis) synthesis will be performed and STATA V.16 will be used to estimate the burden of PTLD. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Our results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021274018.

Bleeding with vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor: A network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Targeted therapies like vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) are the first-choice treatment in several types of cancers. We aim to determine the comparative risk of bleeding events associated with the VEGFR-TKIs through a network meta-analysis. METHODS: Published data search up to November 2018 reporting bleeding in cancer patients treated with VEGFR-TKIs was performed. The primary outcome was presence of hemorrhagic events at the end of the trial. Bleeding as a side-effect profile was examined for eleven VEGFR-TKIs (Apatinib, Brivanib, Cabozantinib, Lenvatinib, Motesanib, Nintedanib, Pazopanib, Regorafenib, Sorafenib, Sunitinib and Vandetanib). Network meta-analysis based on random effects model estimating Odds Ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI), compared the risk of bleeding events among the VEGFR-TKIs with respect to placebo control conditions. RESULTS: Fifty Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) including 16,753 cancer patients were included in this analysis. Twenty studies compared VEGFR-TKIs with placebo, the remaining studies compared VEGFR-TKIs with the standard chemotherapeutic regimen. VEGFR-TKIs were associated with increased incidence of all-grade hemorrhagic events in comparison to control (standard chemotherapy and/or placebo) (OR = 1.79; 95 % CI 1.50-2.13, p-value <0.0001) and placebo (OR = 1.50; 95 % CI 1.16-1.93, p-value = 0.1). However, there was no difference in high-grade bleeding in patients treated with VEGFR-TKI in comparison to control (OR = 1.22; 95 % CI 0.87-1.71, p-value 0.74) or placebo alone (OR = 1.05; 95 % CI 0.65-1.70, p-value 0.73). Among individual VEGFR-TKIs, Sunitinib (OR = 3.31, 95 % CI 2.34-4.69) and Regorafenib (OR = 2.92, 95 % CI 1.50-5.71) were associated with higher risk of hemorrhagic events in comparison to placebo. CONCLUSION: VEGR-TKIs, particularly Sunitinib and Regorafenib appear to be associated with increased risk of bleeding incidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42017056406.

Stimulant Use in the Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Qualitative Literature Review.

Objective: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) often presents with cognitive complaints including difficulty with attention and concentration. As these symptoms resemble those of ADHD, stimulants may be a potential treatment for mTBI. This review evaluates the literature on the use of stimulants for the treatment of mTBI. Method: A systematic evaluation of the literature using six databases: Ovidmedline, Pubmed, psychINFO, CINAH, Embase, and Cochrane. Broad search terms were used and studies were included that evaluate the use of stimulant and stimulant-like medications in the mTBI population. Data extracted included stimulant type and dosing, symptoms targeted, outcomes, safety and tolerability, and if the study population had ADHD. Results: Nine studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Immediate release methylphenidate and amantadine were used for treatment. Methylphenidate had some impact on attention, fatigue, and depression. However, due to the limited number of studies and heterogeneity of study populations, symptoms targeted, and outcome measures used, meaningful conclusions regarding the effect of stimulants in mTBI could not be made. No study evaluated for the presence of ADHD within the study population, despite stimulants being the mainstay treatment for ADHD. Conclusion: PProspective studies on the use of stimulants in mTBI, that evaluate participants for a diagnosis of ADHD, are needed.

Neuropathy with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the association of peripheral neuropathy with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) use in patients with cancer. METHODS: Published data search up to November 2018 reporting peripheral neuropathy in patients with cancer treated with VEGFR-TKIs was performed. The primary outcome was presence of peripheral neuropathy at the end of the trial. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate relative risk (RR) of individual treatment. RESULTS: Thirty randomized clinical trials (RCTs) including 12,490 patients with cancer were included in this analysis. Eight studies compared VEGFR-TKIs with placebo and the remaining studies compared VEGFR-TKIs with the standard chemotherapeutic regimen. When compared against placebo, VEGFR-TKIs were associated with a higher risk of peripheral neuropathy (RR 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-2.75, p = 0.01). Similarly, a stronger association was noted for sensory neuropathy with VEGFR-TKIs monotherapy (RR 1.61; 95% CI 1.09-2.37, p = 0.02). Risk of peripheral neuropathy with VEGFR-TKIs was higher even when they were compared against control (either placebo or standard chemotherapeutic agents) (RR 1.08; 95% CI 1.01-1.15, p = 0.03). High-grade neuropathy (RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.06-1.54, p <0.01) and high-grade sensory neuropathy (RR 1.38; 95% CI 1.09-1.74, p < 0.01) were noted more frequently with VEGFR-TKIs treatment compared against control. CONCLUSIONS: VEGFR-TKIs therapy appeared to be associated with an increased risk of neuropathy.

Current state of science in machine learning methods for automatic infant pain evaluation using facial expression information: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Infants can experience pain similar to adults, and improperly controlled pain stimuli could have a long-term adverse impact on their cognitive and neurological function development. The biggest challenge of achieving good infant pain control is obtaining objective pain assessment when direct communication is lacking. For years, computer scientists have developed many different facial expression-centred machine learning (ML) methods for automatic infant pain assessment. Many of these ML algorithms showed rather satisfactory performance and have demonstrated good potential to be further enhanced for implementation in real-world clinical settings. To date, there is no prior research that has systematically summarised and compared the performance of these ML algorithms. Our proposed meta-analysis will provide the first comprehensive evidence on this topic to guide further ML algorithm development and clinical implementation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search four major public electronic medical and computer science databases including Web of Science, PubMed, Embase and IEEE Xplore Digital Library from January 2008 to present. All the articles will be imported into the Covidence platform for study eligibility screening and inclusion. Study-level extracted data will be stored in the Systematic Review Data Repository online platform. The primary outcome will be the prediction accuracy of the ML model. The secondary outcomes will be model utility measures including generalisability, interpretability and computational efficiency. All extracted outcome data will be imported into RevMan V.5.2.1 software and R V3.3.2 for analysis. Risk of bias will be summarised using the latest Prediction Model Study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review and meta-analysis will only use study-level data from public databases, thus formal ethical approval is not required. The results will be disseminated in the form of an official publication in a peer-reviewed journal and/or presentation at relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019118784.

Comparison of treatment options for depression in heart failure: A network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Depression independently predicts poor outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients, including increased mortality, morbidity and 30-day re-hospitalization. In this network meta-analysis, we compared different interventions designed to treat depression in HF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic searches were conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO up to November 2016. Included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) compared interventions (Exercise therapy (ET), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or antidepressant (AD) medications) for depression in heart failure patients. The primary outcome was change in depressive symptoms based on validated measures of depression. Network meta-analysis based on random effects model estimating standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI), compared the effects of the 3 classes of interventions with respect to usual care or placebo control conditions. RESULTS: A total of 21 RCTs (including 4563 HF patients) reporting the effects of treating depression in HF patients were included in the analysis. In comparison to placebo or usual standard of care, ET (SMD -0.38; 95% CI -0.54 to -0.22) and CBT (SMD -0.29; 95% CI -0.58 to -0.01) were associated with reduction in depressive symptoms whereas AD (SMD -0.16; 95% CI -0.44 to 0.11) was less effective. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis is suggestive of therapeutic benefit of ET and CBT in comparison to usual standard of care in treating depression in HF patients. However, comparison among the three interventions was not conclusive. Future randomized clinical trials are warranted to compare the therapeutic effects of ET, CBT and AD in such patients.