RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To radiographically evaluate if vertebral body tethering (VBT) can maintain differential peri-apical vertebral growth at medium-term follow-up of 4 years. METHODS: A prospective, international, multicenter database was queried to identify idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with thoracic VBT. Concave vs. convex vertebral body height, vertebral wedging, and disc wedging of the 3 peri-apical vertebrae were measured by two independent observers at 5 timepoints (pre-operative to 4-year follow-up). RESULTS: 65 skeletally immature patients (60 female, mean 12.8 years old, 21 with open triradiate cartilages) met inclusion criteria. Mean pre-operative maximum scoliosis of 50 ± 8° decreased significantly post-operatively to 27 ± 9° (p < 0.001), which remained stable at 4-year follow-up 30 ± 17° (p = 0.38 vs. post-operative). Mean instrumented scoliosis was 21 ± 14° at 4-year follow-up, which was significantly different than 4-year maximum scoliosis (p < 0.001). Mean pre-operative kyphosis of 30 ± 12° did not significantly change post-operatively (p = 1.0) and remained stable at 4-year follow-up (35 ± 18°; p = 0.05). Mean individual convex vertebral height increased from 17.7 ± 1.9 mm to 19.8 ± 1.5 mm (p < 0.001), while mean individual concave height increased from 14.8 ± 1.9 mm to 17.6 ± 1.6 mm (p < 0.001). Summing the peri-apical heights, the difference in height from pre-operative to 4-year follow-up was greater on the concave (8.3 ± 4.7 mm) than on the convex side (6.2 ± 4.7 mm) (p < 0.001). Mean individual vertebral wedging decreased from 6 ± 2° at pre-operative to 4 ± 2° at 4-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Mean total vertebral and disc wedging started at 29 ± 7° pre-operatively, decreased to 16 ± 6° at post-operative (p < 0.001), then further decreased to 14 ± 8° at 4-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Patients with open triradiate cartilages at the time of surgery had a larger height change over the 4 years compared to those with closed triradiate cartilages (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated with VBT demonstrated differential vertebral growth which was maintained at minimum 4-year follow-up. This effect was more pronounced in patients whose triradiate cartilages were open at the time of surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact on clinical management, potential for peer learning, and referring physician satisfaction with subspecialist reinterpretations of hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) imaging examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HPB CTs and MRIs from outside hospitals were reinterpreted by two subspecialty radiologists between March 2021 and August 2022. Reinterpretation reports were mailed to radiologists that issued primary reports. The electronic record was reviewed to assess for changes in clinical management based on the reinterpretations (yes/no/unavailable). To assess the potential for peer learning, a survey using a 5-point Likert scale was sent to radiologists who issued primary reports. A separate survey was sent to referring physicians to assess satisfaction with reinterpretations. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty imaging examinations (122 CT, 128 MRI) were reinterpreted at the request of 19 referring physicians. Ninety-six radiologists issued primary reports. RADPEER scores 1-3 were assigned to 131/250 (52%), 86/250 (34%), and 33/250 (13%) examinations, respectively. Of 213 reinterpretations with adequate records for assessment, 75/213 (35%) were associated with a change in management; of these, 71/75 (95%) were classified as RADPEER 2 or 3. Most radiologists agreed or strongly agreed with the following: prefer to receive reinterpretations (34/36, 94%); reinterpretations changed practice of reporting HPB imaging examinations (23/36, 64%); and reinterpretations offer opportunities for peer learning (34/36, 94%). Referring physicians agreed or strongly agreed (7/7, 100%) that reinterpretations are valuable and often change or clarify management of patients with complex HPB disease, and offer an opportunity for peer learning. CONCLUSION: Radiologists and referring physicians strongly agree that HPB imaging reinterpretations help support peer learning and patient management, respectively.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of vertebral height and angular measurements for anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT). METHODS: Eight observers measured PA radiographs of 15 idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with AVBT, pre-operative and 4-year follow-up. Vertebral wedging, disc wedging, convex vertebral body heights, and concave vertebral body heights of the 3 apical vertebrae were measured. For each observer, there were a total of 90 measurements for vertebral body height and 75 measurements for all wedging types At least 14 days elapsed between first and second round measurements. RESULTS: From the pre-operative to the 4-year follow-up time-point, the total wedging angle over the 3 peri-apical levels fell from 30 ± 7° to 16 ± 6° (p < 0.001) and the difference between the convex and concave vertebral heights decreased from 9 ± 4 to 6 ± 3 mm (p < 0.001). Interobserver agreement for pre-operative vertebral body heights was good [ICC = 0.80; 95% CI (0.74-0.85)]. At 4-year follow-up there was a moderate agreement [ICC = 0.67 (0.59-0.74)]. There was a poor interobserver agreement for pre-operative wedging angle measurements [ICC = 0.41 (0.32-0.52)] and 4-year follow-up [ICC = 0.45 (0.36-0.56)]. The Limits of Agreement with the Mean (LOAM) for pre-op heights was ± 2.4 mm, similar to the follow-up ± 2.6 mm. When raters are averaged in random groups of two the agreement limits decrease to ± 1.8 mm pre-op and ± 1.6 mm at follow-up. Similarly for wedging angles, LOAM values among the 8 observers of ± 4.6° pre-op and ± 4.2° dropped to ± 2.7° for both pre-op and follow-up when random groups of two raters were averaged together. Intraobserver agreement ranged from good to excellent per individual (ICC = 0.84-0.94) for pre-operative vertebral body heights, but this decreased at 4-year follow-up (ICC = 0.52-0.88). Intraobserver agreement was low overall for wedging (pre-operative ICC = 0.41-0.71; 4-year follow-up ICC = 0.41-0.76). CONCLUSION: Based on 8 individual observers, interobserver agreement ranged from good (pre-operative vertebral body heights) to moderate (4-year follow-up vertebral body heights) to poor (all wedging angles). To improve the reliability of the measurement of wedging angles, we recommend averaging the measurements of at least two observers.