RESUMEN
Biocompatible hydrogels are materials that hold great promise in medicine and biology since the porous structure, the ability to entrap a large amount of water, and the tunability of their mechanical and tissue adhesive properties make them suitable for several applications, including wound healing, drug and cell delivery, cancer treatment, bioelectronics, and tissue regeneration. Among the possible developed systems, injectable hydrogels, owing to their properties, are optimal candidates for in vivo minimally invasive procedures. To be injectable, a hydrogel must be liquid before and during the injection, but it must quickly jellify after injection to form a soft, self-standing, solid material. The possibility to work with a liquid precursor encoding the functions that will be available after gelation allows the development of biocompatible materials that can be employed in surgery and, in particular, in noninvasive procedures. The underlying idea is to reach the target tissue by using just a needle, or by exploiting the natural body orifices, reducing surgery procedure time, induced pain, and risk of infections. Hydrogels with different properties can be obtained by changing the type of cross-linking, the cross-linking density or the molecular weight of the polymer, or by introducing pending functional groups. The introduction of a nanofiller in the hydrogel network allows for expanding the suite of the structural and functional properties and for better mimicking native tissues. In this Account, we discuss how to provide a hydrogel network with designed properties by playing with both the polymeric chains and the fillers. We present selected examples from the literature that show how to introduce stiffness, stretchability, adhesiveness, self-healing, anisotropy, antimicrobial activity, biodegradability, and conductivity in injectable hydrogels. We further describe how the chemical composition, the mechanical properties, and the microarchitecture of the hydrogel influence cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. Examples of injectable hydrogels for innovative minimally invasive procedures are then discussed in detail; in particular, we showcase the use of hydrogels for tumor resection and as vascular chemoembolization agents. We further discuss how one can improve the rheological properties of injectable hydrogels to exploit them in osteochondral tissue engineering. The effect of the introduction of a conductive filler is then presented in relation to the development of electroactive scaffolds for cardiac-tissue engineering and neural and nerve repair. We believe that the rational design of biocompatible, injectable hybrid hydrogels with tunable properties will likely play a crucial role in reducing the invasiveness and improving the outcome of several clinical and surgical setups.
Asunto(s)
Materiales Biocompatibles/química , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Nanogeles/química , Andamios del Tejido/química , Animales , Materiales Biocompatibles/administración & dosificación , Cartílago/metabolismo , Humanos , Inyecciones , Nanogeles/administración & dosificación , Porosidad , Ingeniería de Tejidos/métodosRESUMEN
Background: Image-guided liver surgery and interventions are growing as part of the current trend to translate liver procedures into minimally invasive approaches. Hands-on surgical training in such techniques is required. Consequently, a meaningful and realistic liver tumor model using multi-imaging modalities, such as ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR), cone beam-CT (CBCT), is mandatory. The first aim of this study is to develop a novel tumor-mimic model and assess it with multi-imaging modalities. The second aim is to evaluate the usefulness of the model during image-guided liver procedures. Materials and Methods: The tumor-mimic model is made of a composition of hydrogel, smashed muscle, and gadolinium contrast solution. Five ex vivo livers and three pigs were included in the study. Procedures were performed in an experimental hybrid operating room. Under general anesthesia, US guidance was required to inject the biotumor formula into the pig's liver. US, CT, CBCT, and MR acquisitions were then performed after the initial injection. In vivo models were then used to perform liver procedures, including US-guided biopsy, radiofrequency ablation, and laparoscopic resection. Results: The formula developed is easily injected generating a tissue-like material. Visualization using multi-imaging modalities was appropriate, thereby allowing to perform image-guided techniques. Conclusion: A novel design of an in vivo and ex vivo tissue-like tumor liver model is presented. Due to the multimodality imaging appraisal, it may provide a realistic and meaningful model allowing to perform image-guided liver procedures.