Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 206(10): 1208-1219, 2022 11 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35816632

RESUMEN

Rationale: Although previous studies in environmental epidemiology focused on single or a few exposures, a holistic approach combining multiple preventable risk factors is needed to tackle the etiology of multifactorial diseases such as asthma. Objectives: To investigate the association between combined socioeconomic, external environment, early-life environment, and lifestyle-anthropometric factors and asthma phenotypes. Methods: A total of 20,833 adults from the French NutriNet-Santé cohort were included (mean age, 56.2 yr; SD, 13.2; 72% women). The validated asthma symptom score (continuous) and asthma control (never asthma, controlled asthma, and uncontrolled asthma) were considered. The exposome (n = 87 factors) covered four domains: socioeconomic, external environment, early-life environment, and lifestyle-anthropometric. Cluster-based analyses were performed within each exposome domain, and the identified profiles were studied in association to asthma outcomes in negative binomial (asthma symptom score) or multinomial logistic (asthma control) regression models. Measurements and Main Results: In total, 5,546 (27%) individuals had an asthma symptom score ⩾1, and 1,206 (6%) and 194 (1%) had controlled and uncontrolled asthma, respectively. Three early-life exposure profiles ("high passive smoking-own dogs," "poor birth parameters-daycare attendance-city center," or "⩾2 siblings-breastfed" compared with "farm-pet owner-molds-low passive smoking") and one lifestyle-anthropometric profile ("unhealthy diet-high smoking-overweight" compared with "healthy diet-nonsmoker-thin") were associated with more asthma symptoms and uncontrolled asthma. Conclusions: This large-scale exposome-based study revealed early-life and lifestyle exposure profiles that were at risk for asthma in adults. Our findings support the importance of multiinterventional programs for the primary and secondary prevention of asthma, including control of specific early-life risk factors and promotion of a healthy lifestyle in adulthood.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Exposoma , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco , Humanos , Femenino , Perros , Animales , Masculino , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/etiología , Asma/prevención & control , Fumar/epidemiología , Población Blanca , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos
2.
BMC Public Health ; 22(1): 919, 2022 05 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35534845

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based policy-making to reduce perinatal health inequalities requires an accurate measure of social disparities. We aimed to evaluate the relevance of two municipality-level deprivation indices (DIs), the French-Deprivation-Index (FDep) and the French-European-Deprivation-Index (FEDI) in perinatal health through two key perinatal outcomes: preterm birth (PTB) and small-for-gestational-age (SGA). METHODS: We used two data sources: The French National Perinatal Surveys (NPS) and the French national health data system (SNDS). Using the former, we compared the gradients of the associations between individual socioeconomic characteristics (educational level and income) and "PTB and SGA" and associations between municipality-level DIs (Q1:least deprived; Q5:most deprived) and "PTB and SGA". Using the SNDS, we then studied the association between each component of the two DIs (census data, 2015) and "PTB and SGA". Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated using multilevel logistic regression with random intercept at the municipality level. RESULTS: In the NPS (N = 26,238), PTB and SGA were associated with two individual socioeconomic characteristics: maternal educational level (≤ lower secondary school vs. ≥ Bachelor's degree or equivalent, PTB: aOR = 1.43 [1.22-1.68], SGA: (1.31 [1.61-1.49]) and household income (< 1000 € vs. ≥ 3000 €, PTB: 1.55 [1.25-1.92], SGA: 1.69 [1.45-1.98]). For both FDep and FEDI, PTB and SGA were more frequent in deprived municipalities (Q5: 7.8% vs. Q1: 6.3% and 9.0% vs. 5.9% for PTB, respectively, and 12.0% vs. 10.3% and 11.9% vs. 10.2% for SGA, respectively). However, after adjustment, neither FDep nor FEDI showed a significant gradient with PTB or SGA. In the SNDS (N = 726,497), no FDep component, and only three FEDI components were significantly associated (specifically, the % of the population with ≤ lower secondary level of education with both outcomes (PTB: 1.5 [1.15-1.96]); SGA: 1.25 [1.03-1.51]), the % of overcrowded (i.e., > 1 person per room) houses (1.63 [1.15-2.32]) with PTB only, and unskilled farm workers with SGA only (1.52 [1.29-1.79]). CONCLUSION: Some components of FDep and FEDI were less relevant than others for capturing ecological inequalities in PTB and SGA. Results varied for each DI and perinatal outcome studied. These findings highlight the importance of testing DI relevance prior to examining perinatal health inequalities, and suggest the need to develop DIs that are suitable for pregnant women. .


Asunto(s)
Nacimiento Prematuro , Ciudades , Femenino , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos
3.
Matern Child Nutr ; 18(4): e13410, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35909344

RESUMEN

Breastfeeding (BF) initiation rates in French maternity units are among the lowest in Europe. After increasing for several years, they decreased between 2010 and 2016, although several maternal characteristics known to be positively associated with BF in France were more frequent. We aimed to (1) quantify adjusted trends in BF initiation rates between 2010 and 2016; (2) examine associations between BF initiation rates and newborn, maternal, maternity unit, and department-level characteristics. Using data from the 2010 (n = 12,224) and 2016 (n = 11,089) French National Perinatal Surveys, we analysed BF initiation (exclusive, mixed, and any) through a succession of six mixed-effect multinomial regression models, progressively adding adjustment covariates. Adjusted exclusive and any BF initiation rates decreased by 9.6 and 4.5 points, respectively, versus by 7.7 and 1.8 points, respectively, in the crude analysis. In both years, adjusted exclusive and any BF initiation rates were lowest in the following categories of mothers: low education level, single, high body mass index and multiple or premature births. Exclusive BF initiation decreased most in primiparous mothers, those with the lowest household income, mothers that had a vaginal delivery, women born in an African country and those who delivered in a maternity unit without Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative designation. The 2010-2016 decrease in BF initiation rates in France cannot be explained by changes in mothers' characteristics; quite the opposite, adjustment increased its magnitude. Additional efforts should be put in place to understand why this decrease is particularly sharp in some subgroups of mothers.


Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Madres , Escolaridad , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Parto , Embarazo
4.
BMC Public Health ; 21(1): 2157, 2021 11 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34819057

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in France was associated with high excess mortality, and anecdotal evidence pointed to differing excess mortality patterns depending on social and environmental determinants. In this study we aimed to investigate the spatial distribution of excess mortality during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in France and relate it at the subnational level to contextual determinants from various dimensions (socioeconomic, population density, overall health status, healthcare access etc.). We also explored whether the determinants identified at the national level varied depending on geographical location. METHODS: We used available national data on deaths in France to calculate excess mortality by department for three age groups: 0-49, 50-74 and > 74 yrs. between March 1st and April 27th, 2020. We selected 15 variables at the department level that represent four dimensions that may be related to overall mortality at the ecological level, two representing population-level vulnerabilities (morbidity, social deprivation) and two representing environmental-level vulnerabilities (primary healthcare supply, urbanization). We modelled excess mortality by age group for our contextual variables at the department level. We conducted both a global (i.e., country-wide) analysis and a multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) model to account for the spatial variations in excess mortality. RESULTS: In both age groups, excess all-cause mortality was significantly higher in departments where urbanization was higher (50-74 yrs.: ß = 15.33, p < 0.001; > 74 yrs.: ß = 18.24, p < 0.001) and the supply of primary healthcare providers lower (50-74 yrs.: ß = - 8.10, p < 0.001; > 74 yrs.: ß = - 8.27, p < 0.001). In the 50-74 yrs. age group, excess mortality was negatively associated with the supply of pharmacists (ß = - 3.70, p < 0.02) and positively associated with work-related mobility (ß = 4.62, p < 0.003); in the > 74 yrs. age group our measures of deprivation (ß = 15.46, p < 0.05) and morbidity (ß = 0.79, p < 0.008) were associated with excess mortality. Associations between excess mortality and contextual variables varied significantly across departments for both age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Public health strategies aiming at mitigating the effects of future epidemics should consider all dimensions involved to develop efficient and locally tailored policies within the context of an evolving, socially and spatially complex situation.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Anciano , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Matern Child Health J ; 22(1): 101-110, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28780684

RESUMEN

Objectives Timely access to health care is critical in obstetrics. Yet obtaining reliable estimates of travel times to hospital for childbirth poses methodological challenges. We compared two measures of travel time, self-reported and calculated, to assess concordance and to identify determinants of long travel time to hospital for childbirth. Methods Data came from the 2010 French National Perinatal Survey, a national representative sample of births (N = 14 681). We compared both travel time measures by maternal, maternity unit and geographic characteristics in rural, peri-urban and urban areas. Logistic regression models were used to study factors associated with reported and calculated times ≥30 min. Cohen's kappa coefficients were also calculated to estimate the agreement between reported and calculated times according to women's characteristics. Results In urban areas, the proportion of women with travel times ≥30 min was higher when reported rather than calculated times were used (11.0 vs. 3.6%). Longer reported times were associated with non-French nationality [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.3 (95% CI 1.0-1.7)] and inadequate prenatal care [aOR 1.5 (95% CI 1.2-2.0)], but not for calculated times. Concordance between the two measures was higher in peri-urban and rural areas (52.4 vs. 52.3% for rural areas). Delivery in a specialised level 2 or 3 maternity unit was a principal determinant of long reported and measured times in peri-urban and rural areas. Conclusions for Practice The level of agreement between reported and calculated times varies according to geographic context. Poor measurement of travel time in urban areas may mask problems in accessibility.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto , Viaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Femenino , Francia , Hospitales , Humanos , Atención Prenatal , Población Rural , Población Suburbana , Población Urbana
6.
Eur J Public Health ; 24(6): 905-10, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24390464

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The number of maternity units has declined in France, raising concerns about the possible impact of increasing travel distances on perinatal health outcomes. We investigated impact of distance to closest maternity unit on perinatal mortality. METHODS: Data from the French National Vital Statistics Registry were used to construct foetal and neonatal mortality rates over 2001-08 by distance from mother's municipality of residence and the closest municipality with a maternity unit. Data from French neonatal mortality certificates were used to compute neonatal death rates after out-of-hospital birth. Relative risks by distance were estimated, adjusting for individual and municipal-level characteristics. RESULTS: Seven percent of births occurred to women residing at ≥30 km from a maternity unit and 1% at ≥45 km. Foetal and neonatal mortality rates were highest for women living at <5 km from a maternity unit. For foetal mortality, rates increased at ≥45 km compared with 5-45 km. In adjusted models, long distance to a maternity unit had no impact on overall mortality but women living closer to a maternity unit had a higher risk of neonatal mortality. Neonatal deaths associated with out-of-hospital birth were rare but more frequent at longer distances. At the municipal-level, higher percentages of unemployment and foreign-born residents were associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSION: Overall mortality was not associated with living far from a maternity unit. Mortality was elevated in municipalities with social risk factors and located closest to a maternity unit, reflecting the location of maternity units in deprived areas with risk factors for poor outcome.


Asunto(s)
Muerte Fetal , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Mortalidad Infantil/tendencias , Servicios de Salud Materna/organización & administración , Viaje , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Sistema de Registros , Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
7.
Int J Epidemiol ; 53(3)2024 Apr 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38857529

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) is associated with improved breastfeeding outcomes in many high-income countries including the UK and the USA, but its effectiveness has never been evaluated in France. We investigated the impact of the BFHI on breastfeeding rates in French maternity units in 2010, 2016 and 2021 to assess if the BFHI aids to reduce inequalities in breastfeeding. METHODS: We examined breastfeeding in maternity units (exclusive, mixed and any breastfeeding) in mothers of singleton full-term newborns using the 2010 (n = 13 075), 2016 (n = 10 919) and 2021 (n = 10 209) French National Perinatal Surveys. We used mixed-effect hierarchical multinomial regression models adjusting for neonatal, maternal, maternity unit and French administrative department characteristics, and tested certain interactions. RESULTS: The adjusted rate of exclusive breastfeeding was higher by +5.8 (3.4-8.1) points among mothers delivering in BFHI-accredited maternity units compared with those delivering in non-accredited units. When compared with average-weight newborns, this difference was sharper for infants with low birthweight: +14.9 (10.0-19.9) points when their birthweight was 2500 g. Mixed breastfeeding was lower by -1.7 points (-3.2-0) in BFHI-accredited hospitals, with no notable difference according to the neonatal or maternal characteristics. CONCLUSION: Mothers delivering in BFHI-accredited maternity units had higher exclusive breastfeeding rates and lower mixed breastfeeding rates than those delivering in non-accredited maternity units. The positive impact of the BFHI was stronger among low-birthweight neonates, who are less often breastfed, helping reduce the gap for this vulnerable group while favouring mothers with higher education levels.


Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Lactancia Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Francia , Recién Nacido , Adulto , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Embarazo , Adulto Joven , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Adolescente
8.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 13: 97, 2013 Apr 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23617598

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Social factors affect the risk of very preterm birth and may affect subsequent outcomes in those born preterm. We assessed the influence of neighbourhood socio-economic characteristics on the risk and outcomes of singleton very preterm birth (<32 weeks of gestation) in two European regions with different health systems. METHODS: Live births (n=1118) from a population-based cohort of very preterm infants in 2003 in Trent (UK) and Ile-de-France (France) regions were geocoded to their neighbourhood census tracts. Odds ratios for very preterm singleton birth by neighbourhood characteristics (unemployment rate, proportion manual workers, proportion with high school education only, non home ownership) were computed using infants enumerated in the census as a control population. The impact of neighbourhood variables was further assessed by pregnancy and delivery characteristics and short term infant outcomes. RESULTS: Risk of very preterm singleton birth was higher in more deprived neighbourhoods in both regions (OR between 2.5 and 1.5 in the most versus least deprived quartiles). No consistent associations were found between neighbourhood deprivation and maternal characteristics or health outcomes for very preterm births, although infants in more deprived neighbourhoods were less likely to be breastfed at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Neighbourhood deprivation had a strong consistent impact on the risk of singleton very preterm birth in two European regions, but did not appear to be associated with maternal characteristics or infant outcomes. Differences in breastfeeding at discharge suggest that socio-economic factors may affect long term outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Áreas de Pobreza , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Adulto , Lactancia Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recien Nacido Extremadamente Prematuro , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto Joven
9.
Int J Health Geogr ; 11: 35, 2012 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22905951

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite national policies to promote user choice for health services in many European countries, current trends in maternity unit closures create a context in which user choice may be reduced, not expanded. Little attention has been paid to the potential impact of closures on pregnant women's choice of maternity unit. We study here how pregnant women's choices interact with the distance they must travel to give birth, individual socioeconomic characteristics and the supply of maternity units in France in 2003. RESULTS: Overall, about one-third of women chose their maternity units based on proximity. This proportion increased steeply as supply was constrained. Greater distances between the first and second closest maternity unit were strongly associated with increasing preferences for proximity; when these distances were ≥ 30 km, over 85% of women selected the closest unit (revealed preference) and over 70% reported that proximity was the reason for their choice (expressed preference). Women living at a short distance to the closest maternity unit appeared to be more sensitive to increases in distance between their first and second closest available maternity units. The preference for proximity, expressed and revealed, was related to demographic and social characteristics: women from households in the manual worker class chose a maternity unit based on its proximity more often and also went to the nearest unit when compared with women from professional and managerial households. These sociodemographic associations held true after adjusting for supply factors, maternal age and socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS: Choice seems to be arbitrated in both absolute and relative terms. Taking changes in supply into consideration and how these affect choice is an important element for assessing the real impact of maternity unit closures on pregnant women's experiences. An indicator measuring the proportion of women for whom the distance between the first and second maternity unit is greater than 30 km can provide a simple measure of choice to complement indicators of geographic accessibility in evaluations of the impact of maternity unit closures.


Asunto(s)
Conducta de Elección , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Salud Materna/provisión & distribución , Adulto , Femenino , Francia , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Atención Perinatal , Sistema de Registros , Población Rural , Población Urbana , Adulto Joven
10.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol ; 25(4): 347-56, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21649677

RESUMEN

Neighbourhood-level deprivation is associated with preterm birth; preterm birth rates are also higher for some, but not all migrant groups. We studied the impact of neighbourhood characteristics (a deprivation score and the proportion of foreign-born residents) on singleton preterm birth in the French district of Seine-Saint-Denis for women born in France, North Africa, sub-Saharan Africa and other countries. Multilevel logistic regression models were adjusted for maternal demographic and health care characteristics. For women born in France, the preterm birth rate rose with neighbourhood deprivation quintile (3.8% in the first to 5.7% in the fifth, adjusted odds ratio: 1.40 [95% confidence interval 1.14, 1.72]) and with increasing proportions of foreign-born residents. Preterm birth rates were not higher in more deprived neighbourhoods for women born outside of France and were lower in neighbourhoods with more foreign-born residents; in multilevel models, the inverse association with deprivation remained significant for women from sub-Saharan Africa. Area-based deprivation measures should be used with caution in populations with large numbers of migrants. These results raise questions about the health benefits of clustering for migrant communities as well as the negative consequences of acculturation.


Asunto(s)
Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Características de la Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Migrantes , Adolescente , Adulto , África del Sur del Sahara , África del Norte , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Modelos Logísticos , Edad Materna , Madres , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto Joven
11.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol ; 22(2): 126-35, 2008 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18298686

RESUMEN

Delivery of very preterm babies in maternity units with on-site neonatal intensive care (level III units) is associated with lower mortality and morbidity. This analysis explores risk factors for not delivering in a level III unit, using data from a population-based study of very preterm births in Paris and surrounding districts in 2003. The sample for analysis included resident women with a fetus alive at the onset of labour between 24 and 31 weeks of gestation (n = 641). Characteristics of women delivering in and those not in level III units were compared using logistic regression. Further analysis was carried out for the subgroup of women not already scheduled to deliver in a level III unit. Twenty-nine per cent of women did not deliver in level III units; in the subgroup scheduled to deliver in level I or II units, 43% were not transferred. Women were less likely to deliver in a level III unit if they had a singleton pregnancy, a gestation of <26 weeks or at 31 weeks, experienced antenatal haemorrhaging, lived in socially deprived neighbourhoods or at a greater distance from the nearest level III. Women scheduled to deliver in a maternity unit with a special care nursery were also less likely to deliver in a level III unit. In contrast, preterm rupture of membranes and fetal growth restriction increased the likelihood of a level III delivery. These results underline the importance of controlling for clinical characteristics when analysing perinatal outcome by place of delivery and show how socioeconomic factors, known to impact on the risk of having a preterm birth, can also affect access to appropriate care.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Trabajo de Parto Prematuro/epidemiología , Atención Perinatal , Adulto , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Modelos Logísticos , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos
12.
Soc Sci Med ; 67(10): 1521-9, 2008 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18757128

RESUMEN

As in many other countries, the number of maternity units has diminished substantially in France, raising concerns about the reduced accessibility of obstetric services. We describe here the impact of closures on distance and mean travel time between pregnant women's homes and maternity units. We used data from the 1998 and 2003 French National Perinatal Surveys and from vital registries to measure indicators of accessibility: straight-line distance to the nearest maternity unit, number of units within a 15-km radius and reported travel time to the unit for delivery. We analyzed these measures for all births, births in rural versus urban areas and according to regional rates of maternity closures. From 1998 to 2003, 20% of maternity units closed (reducing the number from 759 to 621) with regional variations in the rate of closure from 0.0% to 36.0%. Mean distance to the nearest maternity unit increased (6.6-7.2 km, p < 0.001). The proportion of women living more than 30 km from a maternity ward was low; but rose from 1.4% to 1.8%. The number of maternity units with a 15-km radius of the place of residence fell (median, 3 to 2). Differences were more marked in rural areas and in regions highly affected by closures. However, reported travel time did not increase and even declined slightly for women from urban areas and in regions moderately affected by the closures. As such, the closures do not appear to have had a negative impact on the geographic accessibility of maternity units. Pregnant women were faced with a reduction in the number of maternity units near their homes and our results suggest that they more often chose their maternity units based on proximity. A full assessment of the impact of closures on accessibility to obstetric services would require information on how these changes affected available choices for care during pregnancy and delivery.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Servicios de Salud Materna/provisión & distribución , Servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia en Hospital/provisión & distribución , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Materna/tendencias , Área sin Atención Médica , Embarazo , Población Rural
13.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 66(2): 124-9, 2002 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12135280

RESUMEN

Fifty children from 9 families were enrolled in a longitudinal study of 8 months to evaluate individual levels of Plasmodium falciparum density in blood during asymptomatic infections. Individual parasite densities were adjusted for age and date of blood intake. The arithmetic means of these adjusted parasite densities (MAPD) were not influenced by sickle cell trait nor by G6PD enzyme activity. On the contrary, family analysis revealed the presence of similar MAPD values according to the sibships. Moreover, sibships frequently infected with P. malariae exhibited the highest P. falciparum MAPDs. The difference in aggressiveness of malaria vectors between the northern and southern halves of the village did not explain the distribution of MAPD, nor did it explain the differences in mean frequency of P. malariae infection among the sibships. We conclude that the familial characteristic of susceptibility to both P. falciparum and P. malariae infections is more likely influenced by the host's genetic background than by differences in the levels of malaria transmission.


Asunto(s)
Malaria Falciparum/epidemiología , Malaria Falciparum/genética , Plasmodium falciparum/aislamiento & purificación , Adolescente , Animales , Antígenos de Grupos Sanguíneos , Niño , Preescolar , Familia , Femenino , Gabón/epidemiología , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Glucosafosfato Deshidrogenasa/genética , Hemoglobina A/análisis , Hemoglobina Falciforme/análisis , Humanos , Lactante , Estudios Longitudinales , Malaria Falciparum/sangre , Malaria Falciparum/etiología , Masculino , Fenotipo , Plasmodium falciparum/patogenicidad
14.
J Epidemiol Community Health ; 58(10): 826-30, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15365107

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Decision making for health care at the household level is a crucial factor for malaria management and control among young children. This study sought to determine exactly how mothers reacted when faced with fever in a child. DESIGN: Qualitative study based on in depth semistructured interviews of mothers and free form discussion with traditional healers (Nganga). SETTING: Village of Dienga, a rural area of Gabon (Central Africa). PARTICIPANTS: 12 mothers and three traditional healers. RESULTS: All mothers thought that fever and malaria were identical. Mothers home treated or went to the village treatment centre, or both, on the last episode of fever, if they judged it to be "natural" fever. However, if fever was thought to be a result of malicious intent, then a Nganga was consulted first. It was believed that strong and above all persistent fever was "supernatural". In this case, traditional treatment was thought to be best. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that fever is perceived as a dual condition, with two distinct but non-mutually exclusive aetiologies (either "natural" or from witchcraft). In contrast with what is commonly believed, there seems to be no clear cut distinction between diseases suitable for management by western medicine and diseases to be managed solely by traditional health practitioners. Moreover, these data do not support the commonly held notion that the decision to seek western medicine to treat fever is considered a "last resort". Results strongly imply that some severe cases of fever, being initially considered supernatural, may partially or completely escape medical attention.


Asunto(s)
Fiebre/etiología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Malaria/terapia , Medicinas Tradicionales Africanas , Madres/psicología , Adulto , Niño , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Fiebre/terapia , Gabón , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Malaria/diagnóstico , Malaria/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Terminología como Asunto
15.
PLoS One ; 9(6): e101007, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24971939

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: People share medicines and problems can result from this behavior. Successful interventions to change sharing behavior will require understanding people's motives and purposes for sharing medicines. Better information about how medicines fit into the gifting and reciprocity system could be useful in designing interventions to modify medicine sharing behavior. However, it is uncertain how people situate medicines among other items that might be shared. This investigation is a descriptive study of how people sort medicines and other shareable items. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This study in the Dominican Republic examined how a convenience sample (31 people) sorted medicines and rated their shareability in relation to other common household items. We used non-metric multidimensional scaling to produce association maps in which the distances between items offer a visual representation of the collective opinion of the participants regarding the relationships among the items. In addition, from a pile sort constrained by four categories of whether sharing or loaning the item was acceptable (on a scale from not shareable to very shareable), we assessed the degree to which the participants rated the medicines as shareable compared to other items. Participants consistently grouped medicines together in all pile sort activities; yet, medicines were mixed with other items when rated by their candidacy to be shared. Compared to the other items, participants had more variability of opinion as to whether medicines should be shared. CONCLUSIONS: People think of medicines as a distinct group, suggesting that interventions might be designed to apply to medicines as a group. People's differing opinions as to whether it was appropriate to share medicines imply a degree of uncertainty or ambiguity that health promotion interventions might exploit to alter attitudes and behaviors. These findings have implications for the design of health promotion interventions to impact medicine sharing behavior.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Ceremonial , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/psicología , Donaciones , Artículos Domésticos , Adulto , República Dominicana , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
16.
Health Place ; 17(5): 1170-3, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21727022

RESUMEN

Maternity unit closures in France have increased distances that women travel to deliver in hospital. We studied how the supply of maternity units influences the rate of out-of-hospital births using birth certificate data. In 2005-6, 4.3 per 1000 births were out-of-hospital. Rates were more than double for women living 30km or more from their nearest unit and were even higher for women of high parity. These associations persisted in multilevel analyses adjusting for other maternal characteristics. Long distances to maternity units should be a concern to health planners because of the maternal and infant health risks.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Salud Materna/provisión & distribución , Parto , Adulto , Certificado de Nacimiento , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Área sin Atención Médica , Paridad , Embarazo , Adulto Joven
18.
Health Place ; 16(3): 531-8, 2010 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20083421

RESUMEN

Survival and quality of life are improved for very preterm babies when delivery occurs in a maternity unit with on-site neonatal intensive care (level III unit). We investigated the impact of distance on the probability of delivering in such a unit for births before 32 weeks of gestation from 9 European regions with diverse perinatal health systems (the MOSAIC cohort). We analysed distances between women's homes, and the nearest level III in population quartiles, adjusting for maternal and pregnancy characteristics. Living farther away from a level III reduced access to specialised care everywhere; in some regions women residing in the fourth quartile were half as likely to deliver in level III units as those in the first. To improve regionalized perinatal care the spatial location of level III units should be taken into account.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Salud Materna/provisión & distribución , Atención Perinatal/organización & administración , Nacimiento Prematuro , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Análisis Multivariante , Embarazo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA