Safety of nifedipine in threatened preterm labor: Investigation by three-dimensional echocardiography.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate atrial and ventricular parameters using real time three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (RT3DTTE) in women treated with nifedipine in the early third trimester (III-T) of pregnancy. METHODS: A prospective single-subject design study in a university-affiliated hospital, where each participant served as her own control. We studied 25 pregnant women at a gestational age of 25-33 weeks with TPTL prior to vs 48 hours postnifedipine treatment. Two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2DTTE) and RT3DTTE were used to study 3D left atrial (LA) volumes and indexes, emptying fraction, left ventricular and LA cavities, and total vascular resistance (TVR). RESULTS: Two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography showed a significant increase in LA area (from 15.2 ± 2.62 to 16.16 ± 2.21 mm2 , P = .02) before vs after nifedipine; RT3DTTE showed a significant change in LA end-diastolic volume index (from 23.7 ± 4.2 to 26.75 ± 3.8 mL/m2 , P = .008). LA end-systolic volume and index were not significantly different before vs after nifedipine (from 24.56 ± 8 to 25.3 ± 5.5 mL, from 13.6 ± 5.3 to 14.8 ± 3.4 mL/m2 ); P > .05, respectively. E/a ratio, E-tdi, and E/E-tdi did not change significantly ([from 2.54 ± 4.46 to 2.54 ± 4.1], [from 11.9 ± 1.9 to 11.9 ± 2], [from 7.8 ± 1.4 to 7.6 ± 1.1], respectively, P > .05). Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) did not change significantly from 23.77 ± 4.2 to 23.9 ± 3.3, P = .1. There was a significant decrease in pulmonary pressure (from 25.4 ± 4.2 to 23 ± 2.5 mm Hg, P = .02), in mean arterial pressure (from 80 ± 4 to 76 ± 3 mm Hg, P < .001) and in TVR (from 1160 ± 260 to 1050 ± 206 dyne s/cm-5 , P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: According to RT3DTTE measurements, in pregnant women treated with nifedipine for tocolysis, there were no detrimental cardiovascular effects detected 48 hours postnifedipine treatment. RT3DTTE could show accurately the compensatory response of the left heart to the cardiovascular changes induced by treatment with nifedipine.

Isolated ascending aorta dilatation is associated with increased risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an asymptomatic condition characterized by progressive dilatation of the aorta. The purpose of this study is to identify important 2D-TTE aortic indices associated with AAA as predictive tools for undiagnosed AAA. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we evaluated the size of the ascending aorta in patients without known valvular diseases or hemodynamic compromise as predictive tool for undiagnosed AAA. We studied the tubular ascending aorta of 170 patients by 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2D-TTE). Patients were further divided into two groups, 70 patients with AAA and 100 patients without AAA with normal imaging results. RESULTS: Dilatation of tubular ascending aorta was measured in patients with AAA compared to the group with absent AAA (37.5 ± 4.8 mm vs. 31.2 ± 3.6 mm, p < 0.001, respectively) and confirmed by computed tomographic (CT) (35.6 ± 5.1 mm vs. 30.8 ± 3.7 mm, p < 0.001, respectively). An increase in tubular ascending aorta size was associated with the presence of AAA by both 2D-TTE and CT (r = 0.40, p < 0.001 and r = 0.37, p < 0.001, respectively). The tubular ascending aorta (D diameter) size of ≥33 mm or ≥ 19 mm/m2 presented with 2-4 times more risk of AAA presence (OR 4.68, CI 2.18-10.25, p = 0.001 or OR 2.63, CI 1.21-5.62, p = 0.02, respectively). In addition, multiple logistic regression analysis identified tubular ascending aorta (OR 1.46, p < 0.001), age (OR 1.09, p = 0.013), gender (OR 0.12, p = 0.002), and LVESD (OR 1.24, p = 0.009) as independent risk factors of AAA presence. CONCLUSIONS: An increased tubular ascending aortic diameter, measured by 2D-TTE, is associated with the presence of AAA. Routine 2D-TTE screening for silent AAA by means of ascending aorta analysis, may appear useful especially in older patients with a dilated tubular ascending aorta (≥33 mm).

Difference in left atrial appendage remodeling between diabetic and nondiabetic patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common and increasingly prevalent condition in patients with atrial fibrillation (AFib). The left atrium appendage (LAA), a small outpouch from the LA, is the most common location for thrombus formation in patients with AFib. HYPOTHESIS: In this study, we examined LAA remodeling differences between diabetic and nondiabetic patients with AFib. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data from 242 subjects subdivided into two subgroups of 122 with DM (diabetic group) and 120 without DM (nondiabetic group). The study group underwent real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (RT3DTEE) for AFib ablation, cardioversion, or LAA device closure. The LAA dimensions were measured using the "Yosefy rotational 3DTEE method." RESULTS: The RT3DTEE analysis revealed that diabetic patients display larger LAA diameters, D1-lengh (2.09 ± 0.50 vs 1.88 ± 0.54 cm, P = .003), D2-width (1.70 ± 0.48 vs 1.55 ± 0.55 cm, P = .024), D3-depth (2.21 ± 0.75 vs 1.99 ± 0.65 cm, P = .017), larger orifice areas (2.8 ± 1.35 and 2.3 ± 1.49 cm2 , P = .004), and diminished orifice flow velocity (37.3 ± 17.6 and 43.7 ± 19.5 cm/sec, P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: Adverse LAA remodeling in DM patients with AFib is characterized by significantly LAA orifice enlargement and reduced orifice flow velocity. Analysis of LAA geometry and hemodynamics may have clinical implications in thrombotic risk assessment and treatment of DM patients with AFib.