Ultrasound-guided versus blind interventions in patellar tendon lesions: a cadaveric study.

PURPOSE: The present study aims to analyze the accuracy of injections aimed to hit the proximal and depth part of the patellar tendon "target point" in patellar tendinopathy, comparing ultrasound-guided or non-ultrasound-guided (blind) injections. METHODS: A cadaver randomized study was carried out. Injections were performed under ultrasound control, as well as blinded. There were 26 knees from fresh cadavers and injections were placed by 26 practitioners with experience in the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound and injection treatment. Each participant performed 6 ultrasound-guided and 6 blind punctures in different cadaveric specimens. This provided 312 injections that were analyzed in 2 different anatomical cuts, thus providing a database of 624 measurements for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed (p < 0.0001) in the distance from the target point between the ultrasound-guided and the non-guided infiltrations. The "unguided" injections were considered to have been performed on average 10 mm away from the target point compared to the "ultrasound-guided" injections. The ultrasound-guided injections obtained an accuracy of 74.36% while the "non-ultrasound-guided" injections obtained an accuracy of 11.54% (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The use of ultrasound to guide the positioning of injections on the dorsal side of the proximal patellar tendon had a significantly higher accuracy compared to blind injections. The finding provides knowledge of importance for injection treatment.

New Keratoconus Risk Factors: A Cross-Sectional Case-Control Study.

Purpose: To evaluate risk factors associated with keratoconus in a monocentric cross-sectional case-control study. Methods: This observational study occurred from June 2019 to February 2021 in a university hospital (France). The case group consisted of 195 patients with keratoconus in at least one eye who were followed up by a corneal specialist. The control group consisted of 195 patients without any evidence of keratoconus on slit-lamp examination and corneal topography, who were matched 1 : 1 to controls by age and sex. Data were collected by a self-completed paper questionnaire before the consultation, and a multivariate logistic regression was performed. Results: Multivariate analysis revealed significant associations of keratoconus with family history (odds ratio [OR] = 22.2, p < 0.001), rubbing eyes (OR = 10.9, p < 0.001), allergy (any kind) (OR = 3.80, p < 0.001), smoking exposure (OR = 2.08, p=0.017), and dry eyes (OR = 1.77, p=0.045f). The worst eye was associated with the more rubbed eye (p < 0.001) and the more pressed eye during the night according to sleeping position (p < 0.041). Conclusion: This study confirmed the association between keratoconus and eye rubbing, family history, and allergy. It highlighted the role of pressure on the eyes during sleep. Other less known risk factors such as dry eyes and smoking exposure should be explored in future studies.