LOW VULNERABILITY OF THE POSTERIOR EYE SEGMENT TO SARS-COV-2 INFECTION: Chorioretinal SARS-CoV-2 Vulnerability.

PURPOSE: Retinal manifestations have been described in COVID-19 patients, but it is unknown whether SARS-CoV-2, the causal agent in COVID-19, can directly infect posterior ocular tissues. Here, we investigate SARS-CoV-2 host factor gene expression levels and their distribution across retinal and choroidal cell types. METHODS: Query of single-cell RNA sequencing data from human retina and choroid. RESULTS: We find no relevant expression of two key genes involved in SARS-CoV-2 entry, ACE2 and TMPRSS2, in retinal cell types. By contrast, scarce expression levels could be detected in choroidal vascular cells. CONCLUSION: Given the current understanding of viral host cell entry, these findings suggest a low vulnerability of the posterior eye segment to SARS-CoV-2 with a potential weak spot in the vasculature, which could play a putative causative role in ocular lesions in COVID-19 patients. This may qualify the vasculature of the human posterior eye segment as an in vivo biomarker for life-threatening vascular occlusions in COVID-19 patients.

Viral Anterior Uveitis. / Virale anteriore Uveitis.

Differential diagnosis of viral anterior uveitis (AU) based on the typical clinical findings (anterior chamber inflammation, morphology of the keratic precipitates, severity of IOP increase in relapse) is often straightforward. When differential diagnosis is difficult clinically, analysis of aqueous humour by PCR and/or antibody testing (Goldmann-Witmer coefficient) may be helpful. While both modalities are highly specific, they lack absolute sensitivity. Patients with HSV, VZV and CMV associated uveitis require both antiviral as well as antiinflammatory medication and often additional antiglaucomatous therapy, depending on IOP. In contrast, specific antiviral treatment is not possible in rubella associated AU and steroids should be administered with extreme caution due to their adverse effects. With all subtypes of virus associated AU, recurrent episodes put the patients at risk of developing secondary glaucoma, which often requires surgical treatment.

Structural Endpoints and Outcome Measures in Uveitis.

Most uveitis entities are rare diseases but, taken together, are responsible for 5-10% of worldwide visual impairment which largely affects persons of working age. As with many rare diseases, there is a lack of high-level evidence regarding its clinical management, partly due to a dearth of reliable and objective quantitative endpoints for clinical trials. This review provides an overview of available structural outcome measures for uveitis disease activity and damage in an anatomical order from the anterior to the posterior segment of the eye. While there is a multitude of available structural outcome measures, not all might qualify as endpoints for clinical uveitis trials, and thorough testing of applicability is warranted. Furthermore, a consensus on endpoint definition, standardization, and "core outcomes" is required. As stipulated by regulatory agencies, endpoints should be precisely defined, clinically important, internally consistent, reliable, responsive to treatment, and relevant for the respective subtype of uveitis. Out of all modalities used for assessment of the reviewed structural outcome measures, optical coherence tomography, color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, and fluorescein/indocyanine green angiography represent current "core modalities" for reliable and objective quantification of uveitis outcome measures, based on their practical availability and the evidence provided so far.

Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) findings in Serpiginous Choroiditis.

BACKGROUND: To describe changes in the retina/choroid in patients with Serpiginous Choroiditis (SC) by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) in a multimodal imaging approach. METHODS: Prospective, monocentric study of 24 eyes of 12 consenting patients diagnosed with SC, who underwent OCTA, which was analyzed and compared to other methods such as enhanced depth imaging-OCT, fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography, and fundus autofluorescence. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 9 patients with peripapillary SC, 1 macular SC, and 2 atypical cases. All eyes presented an inactive SC confirmed by standard imaging. OCTA demonstrated the lesions tridimensionally in great detail. There was no difference in the angioarchitecture among the 3 forms of SC. A loss of the choriocapillaris/retinal pigment epithelium left a "window-defect", where the vessels of larger caliber of the choroid became recognizable and their appearance inverted ("white-on-black"). A relationship between the presence of segmentation errors (SE) in the slabs and low visual acuity was established with a one-way ANOVA. CONCLUSIONS: OCTA was able to non-invasively assess vascular lesions of the choroid/retina in patients with SC with a high degree of correlation to other diagnostic modalities. Consequent long-term assessments could lead to a better understanding of disease progression.

[Anterior Uveitis: Clinic, Diagnostic Procedure and Treatment Options]. / Anteriore Uveitis: Klinik, diagnostisches Vorgehen und Behandlungsoptionen.

Anterior uveitis involves inflammation of the iris and/or ciliary body and is the most common intraocular inflammation in ophthalmological practice. It can be attributed to an infectious or immune-mediated genesis or be associated with systemic diseases. Anamnesis and (guiding) findings during the slit lamp examination often already provide important information on pathogenesis and thus on further diagnostic clarification and therapy. This includes the assessment of laterality, acute or chronic course of the disease and morphological criteria (granulomatous/non-granulomatous). The guideline-compliant procedure recommends further diagnosis with targeted laboratory diagnostics and, if necessary, consultative examinations if the disease recurs. This is important in order to pursue a targeted treatment approach and to recognize comorbidities.

[Imaging in Uveitis]. / Bildgebung bei Uveitis.

Imaging is one of the key elements in the diagnosis and treatment of eye diseases. This is especially true for intraocular inflammation. In this article, the current imaging modalities such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography, fundus autofluorescence and wide-field imaging modalities are discussed. The use of these examination methods is illustrated, depending on the focus of intraocular inflammation. In addition, current and future options are presented for optimised, objective monitoring for these clinical entities.

Sympathetic Ophthalmia - a Contribution to Immunology, Clinic and Current Imaging. / Sympathische Ophthalmie ­ ein Beitrag zur Immunologie, Klinik und aktuellen Bildgebung.

BACKGROUND: Sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) is a rare inflammation of an operated or injured eye that spreads to the fellow eye. It is typically a bilateral granulomatous panuveitis. The traumatized eye is referred to as inciting eye and the fellow eye as sympathizing eye. The pathophysiology of the disease is not entirely understood, but there is strong evidence of an autoimmune genesis. PATIENTS/MATERIAL AND METHODS: A selective literature search on epidemiology, immunology, clinical features and risk factors of SO was carried out. In addition, our own experience using multimodal imaging for this clinical entity was introduced. RESULTS: In the literature, the incidence after traumatic eye injuries is 0.1 - 3% and approximately 0.01% after intraocular surgery. Among the iatrogenic causes, vitreoretinal surgery has the highest rate of SO, presumably due to disruption of the blood-retinal barrier and involvement of retinal and choroidal tissue, which are susceptible to anterior traction, phthisis and chronic inflammation. In 90% of patients, the disease develops within a year following the eliciting event and is associated with a potentially bilateral risk of blindness. Typical symptoms include bilateral visual impairment with photophobia, dull pain and photopsia. The spectrum of clinical manifestations ranges from granulomatous anterior uveitis and vitritis, to choroiditis, serous retinal detachment and Dalen-Fuchs nodules in the context of posterior involvement. The diagnosis of SO is generally based on clinical presentation and is supported by imaging methods. These primarily comprise fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography, which are increasingly being supplemented by non-invasive methods such as optical coherence tomography. They can provide important information for assessment of severity, differential diagnosis as well as for disease monitoring. The differential diagnosis includes i. a. Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome, ocular sarcoidosis and the rare phacoanaphylactic endophthalmitis. Immediate systemic high-dose steroid therapy is used as initial treatment. The course of the disease is often relapsing to chronic progressive. Immunomodulators such as ciclosporine A, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, and biologics are increasingly being used and contribute to the significantly better prognosis of the disease. Generally, SO can be triggered by any kind of intraocular intervention. CONCLUSION: SO remains a threatening clinical diagnosis that poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. It can be triggered post-traumatic, but also any intraocular surgery. This should be taken into account when assessing the indication for intraocular eye surgery, especially in eyes with reduced visual outcome.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis.

Introduction: Uveitis is a leading cause of visual impairment and a significant burden of blindness. Although corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressive agents have been successfully used, these are non-specific, and their long-term use may induce significant adverse effects. Areas covered: This article discusses existing local and systemic applied treatments for ocular inflammation including corticosteroids, non-biologic, and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD). Potential drugs being studied in clinical trials are introduced for both local and systemic use. Expert opinion: Treatment options for uveitis continue to expand. Still, more efforts and research are needed to better understand the mechanisms potentially leading to clinical trials.

Dexamethasone Inserts in Noninfectious Uveitis: A Single-Center Experience.

PURPOSE: To report the effectiveness of repeated intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) inserts in noninfectious uveitis patients. DESIGN: Prospective, single-center, interventional clinical trial between February 2010 and March 2015. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with noninfectious uveitis with cystoid macular edema and/or vitreitis. METHODS: Patients were treated with a 700-µg intravitreal DEX insert (Ozurdex; Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA). Follow-up visits were scheduled 1, 3, and 6 months after injection. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), vitreous haze (VH) score, intraocular pressure (IOP), and adverse events were recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was the reduction of CRT. Secondary outcome was the improvement in BCVA and reduction of VH. RESULTS: In total, 109 eyes of 76 patients received 298 DEX inserts. Fifty-two patients were women (68%). The mean age of all participants was 57 years (range, 24-88 years). More than 3 DEX inserts were injected into 44% of eyes. Mean number of injections were 1.54±0.5 (standard deviation [SD]), 1.98±0.84, and 2.46±1.1 over 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. Central retinal thickness decreased significantly (P < 0.001) from 465 µm at baseline to 318, 342, and 388 µm after 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. Similar trends were seen in eyes receiving a second, third, and fourth DEX insert. Patients with idiopathic uveitis and sarcoidosis benefited well from DEX inserts. The greatest overall benefit was achieved in patients with no systemic treatment and patients receiving antimetabolites and cyclosporin A. A significant VH score reduction was documented in 44% of eyes after 1 month. A gain of more than 3 lines in BCVA was recorded in 31% to 37%, 26% to 39%, and 8% to 32% of eyes after 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. A transient rise in mean IOP after 1 month (P < 0.001) and after 3 months (P = 0.001) was seen. CONCLUSIONS: The repeated longer-term administration of DEX inserts in noninfectious uveitis patients, either alone or in combination with other therapies, led to improved CRT, BCVA, and VH. Underlying diseases and concomitant systemic therapy seem to have an impact on overall treatment benefit. Ocular complications were reversible and were managed by local treatment, with exception of cataract formation.

Real-life clinical data for dexamethasone and ranibizumab in the treatment of branch or central retinal vein occlusion over a period of six months.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the therapeutic outcome for dexamethasone implant (DEX) or intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) injections over 6 months in patients with macular edema due to branch or central retinal vein occlusion (BRVO, CRVO), in a real-life setting. METHODS: A total of 107 patients with BRVO or CRVO were included into this retrospective single-center observational study. Patients were treated with monotherapy consisting of DEX or three monthly IVR injections following a pro re nata regimen (PRN). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) were compared between the two therapy groups after 1, 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: BRVO patients treated with DEX achieved a statistically significant gain in BCVA measured in logMAR after 1 month (mean gain, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.08-0.34, p = 0.001), 3 months (0.16, 0.03-0.28, p = 0.012) and 6 months (0.19, 0.07-0.32, p = 0.002), whereas patients treated with IVR showed a statistically significant BCVA gain in month 3 (mean improvement, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.01-0.26, p = 0.039) and month 6 (0.16, 0.03-0.29, p = 0.018). BCVA in CRVO patients with DEX worsened slightly at month 6 (mean worsening, 95% CI: -0.08, -0.24 to 0.08, p = 0.305), while IVR treated-patients achieved a statistically significant BCVA gain at 3 months (mean improvement, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.02-0.25, p = 0.021). Both therapies were accompanied by statistically significant CRT reductions of 150 to 200 µm (median). Adverse events reported were predictable and limited. CONCLUSIONS: In a clinical setting, comparable improvement in BCVA and CRT were observed after DEX and IVR injections for treatment of BRVO. CRVO patients showed greater benefit with IVR.

Clinical and imaging biomarkers of response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant in eyes with non-infectious uveitic macular oedema.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate clinical and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) biomarkers correlating with pre-injection visual acuity (VA), post-injection VA, and the likelihood of macular oedema (MO) regression following dexamethasone (DEX) implant injection in non-infectious uveitic (NIU) patients. METHODS: Patient data from Uveitis Services in Milan, Paris, and Berlin were analysed. Eligible participants were NIU patients aged >18 years with MO as the primary indication for DEX treatment. SD-OCT scans and clinical data were collected at the time of DEX injection (pre-injection visit) and after 3 months (post-injection visit). Multivariable regression models, adjusted for pre-injection VA and lens status, were employed to explore associations. MO regression was defined as the absence of intraretinal/subretinal fluid at the post-injection visit. RESULTS: Our analysis comprised data from 173 DEX treatments, encompassing 103 eyes from 80 patients, with 38 eyes (37%) receiving repeated DEX injections. The absence of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) layer and disorganisation of the inner retinal layers (DRIL) were associated with worse pre- (+0.19 LogMAR, 95% CI 0.01-0.38, p = 0.06, and +0.10 LogMAR, 95% CI 0.02-0.21, p = 0.01) and post-injection VA (+0.33 LogMAR, 95% CI 0.08-0.57, p = 0.01, and +0.17 LogMAR, 95% CI 0.01-0.32, p = 0.04). EZ disruption and DRIL increased significantly (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04), and the chance of gaining ≥5 letters declined in eyes undergoing repeated DEX (p = 0.002). The rate of MO regression after each DEX was 67%. Prolonged MO duration (OR = 0.75/each year, p = 0.02) was associated with reduced likelihood of MO regression. Subretinal fluid was associated with higher rate of MO regression (OR = 6.09, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Integrity of the inner and outer retina is associated with better visual response to DEX. Long-standing or recurrent MO is associated with less chance of both visual and anatomic response. Timely treatment is necessary to maximise the outcomes of MO in NIU patients.

Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Uveitis: Dissecting Responder and Non-Responder Outcomes at a Tertiary Center.

Macular edema (ME) remains a primary cause of visual deterioration in uveitis. Visual acuity (VA) can often be maintained using corticosteroid depot systems. This study evaluated the efficacy of a fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN®) in treating non-infectious uveitis using real-world data. This retrospective analysis included 135 eyes subdivided into responders and non-responders. Central retinal thickness (CRT), VA, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were followed over time. A significant decrease in CRT and an increase in VA were observed in all eyes throughout the follow-up period (p < 0.01). An IOP increase (p = 0.028) necessitated treatment in 43% of eyes by Month 6. Non-responders were older (p = 0.004) and had been treated with more dexamethasone (DEX) implants (p = 0.04); 89.3% had a defect in the external limiting membrane (ELM) and inner/outer segment (IS/OS) zone (p < 0.001). Immunomodulatory therapy had no impact on treatment response. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) patients had a mean CRT reduction of 47.55 µm and a reduced effect by Month 24 (p = 0.046) versus non-PPV patients. We conclude that the FAc implant achieves long-term control of CRT and improves VA. Increases in IOP were manageable. Eyes with a previous PPV showed milder results. Data showed a correlation between older age, a damaged ELM and IS/OS zone, frequent DEX inserts, and poorer outcome measures.

Transcriptome Analysis of Choroidal Endothelium Links Androgen Receptor Role to Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.

BACKGROUND: Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (CSCR) manifests as fluid accumulation between the neurosensory retina and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Elevated levels of steroid hormones have been implicated in CSCR pathogenesis. This investigation aims to delineate the gene expression patterns of CSCR-associated risk and steroid receptors across human choroidal cell types and RPE cells to discern potential underlying mechanisms. METHODS: This study utilized a comprehensive query of transcriptomic data derived from non-pathological human choroid and RPE cells. FINDINGS: CSCR-associated genes such as PTPRB, CFH, and others are predominantly expressed in the choroidal endothelium as opposed to the RPE. The androgen receptor, encoded by the AR gene, demonstrates heightened expression in the macular endothelium compared to peripheral regions, unlike other steroid receptor genes. AR-expressing endothelial cells display an augmented responsiveness to Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-ß), indicating a propensity towards endothelial to mesenchymal transition (endMT) transcriptional profiling. INTERPRETATION: These results highlight the proclivity of CSCR to manifest primarily within the choroidal vasculature rather than the RPE, suggesting its categorization as a vascular eye disorder. This study accentuates the pivotal role of androgenic steroids, in addition to glucocorticoids. The observed linkage to TGF-ß-mediated endMT provides a potential mechanistic insight into the disease's etiology.

[Noninfectious posterior uveitis : Clinical aspects, diagnostics, management and treatment]. / Nichtinfektiöse posteriore Uveitis : Klinik, Diagnostik, Management und Therapie.

Noninfectious posterior uveitis (NPU) comprises a heterogeneous group of vision-threatening, immune-mediated ocular and systemic diseases. It is predominantly bilateral and recurrent and, if not treated properly, leads to severe tissue damage that threatens the eyesight. In industrialized countries ca. 10-20% of all cases of blindness are caused by NPU. An NPU can occur at any age but is most common between the ages of 20 and 50 years. Laboratory diagnostic and imaging procedures enable an increasingly better differentiation of the disease spectrum. This makes it possible to better assess the course and prognosis of individual disease entities. An increasing repertoire of systemic and intravitreal forms of treatment has already led to more favorable long-term treatment outcomes. It can be expected that further progress can be achieved with better knowledge of the pathophysiology of the different clinical disorders and appropriate, targeted treatment.

Keep an Eye on the Back: Spondyloarthritis in Patients With Acute Anterior Uveitis.

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to analyze the prevalence of spondyloarthritis (SpA) in patients with acute anterior uveitis (AAU), to identify parameters associated with the presence of SpA, and to evaluate the performance of referral algorithms for identifying patients with a high probability of having SpA. METHODS: Prospectively recruited consecutive patients with noninfectious AAU underwent structured rheumatologic assessment including magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints, allowing a definitive diagnosis/exclusion of concomitant SpA. Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare AAU patients with SpA and AAU patients without SpA. Furthermore, logistic regression analyses were performed. The predictive performance of SpA referral strategies was analyzed by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Among the 189 AAU patients evaluated, 106 (56%) were diagnosed as having SpA. The majority of SpA patients (93%) had predominantly axial SpA and 7 patients had peripheral SpA. In 74 patients (70%), the SpA diagnosis was established for the first time. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, psoriasis (odds ratio [OR] 12.5 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.3-120.2]), HLA-B27 positivity (OR 6.3 [95% CI 2.4-16.4]), elevated C-reactive protein level (OR 4.8 [95% CI 1.9-12.4]), and male sex (OR 2.1 [95% CI 1.1-4.2]) were associated with the presence of SpA. None of the ophthalmologic parameters were found to be predictive of SpA. The Dublin Uveitis Evaluation Tool (DUET) showed higher specificity for SpA recognition than the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) tool for the early referral of patients with a suspected diagnosis of axial SpA (specificity for SpA 42% versus 28%), whereas the sensitivity of the ASAS tool was slightly higher than the DUET tool (sensitivity for SpA 80% versus 78%). However, more than 20% of the AAU patients in this study who were diagnosed as having SpA would have been missed by both referral strategies. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed a high prevalence of SpA in AAU patients overall, as well as a high prevalence of previously undiagnosed SpA in AAU patients. Therefore, we propose rheumatologic evaluation for all AAU patients with musculoskeletal symptoms.

Cytomegalovirus-Positive Posner-Schlossman Syndrome: Impact on Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thinning.

PURPOSE: To report objective morphologic changes in cytomegalovirus (CMV)-positive Posner-Schlossman syndrome (PSS). DESIGN: Retrospective, consecutive case series. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of patients with unilateral PSS tested positive for CMV by Goldmann-Witmer coefficients between 2007 and 2018 at our tertiary eye clinic. We report data on corneal endothelial cell (CEC) count, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), choroidal thickness (CT) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) as well as clinical findings and management. The unaffected eye served as control. RESULTS: Fifty-two eyes of 52 patients were included and followed for 32.8 ± 28.3 months. The peak intraocular pressure was 45 ± 11 mm Hg. The CEC (2241.7 ± 381.1 cells/mm2 vs 2529.4 ± 351.9 cells/mm2, P = .0004) and the global RNFL thickness (80.81 ± 21.01 µm vs 97.38 ± 9.75 µm, P = .0001) were significantly reduced, whereas CT was nonsignificantly higher (295.69 ± 45.46 µm vs 274.00 ± 67.85 µm, P = .156) in the affected eyes compared to the fellow eye. Forty (76.9%) patients were treated with oral valganciclovir (VGC), 2 (3.8%) with topical ganciclovir alone, and 10 (19.2%) received no antiviral therapy. Eight eyes (15.4%) underwent trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. After cessation of oral VGC, 23 patients (57.5%) had recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, CMV-positive PSS was often associated with RNFL thinning and CEC loss. Highly elevated intraocular pressures usually present the most relevant challenge. In conjunction with aqueous humor sampling, monitoring by OCT scans and endothelial microscopy may help to guide therapy decisions.

Rubella Virus- and Cytomegalovirus-Associated Anterior Uveitis: Clinical Findings and How They Relate to the Current Fuchs Uveitis Syndrome Classification.

Rubella virus (RV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) have both been implicated in anterior uveitis (AU). Clinical phenotypes can vary widely among both etiologies, including Fuchs uveitis syndrome (FUS) as a very distinct phenotype that has been associated with both RV and CMV. The Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group recently updated the classification criteria for FUS as unilateral AU, including either heterochromia or diffuse iris atrophy combined with stellate keratic precipitates as key findings. The aim of this study was to determine whether our patients adhere to the classification criteria of FUS as previously reported and whether RV- or CMV-associated uveitis can be differentiated by clinical findings. Therefore, this study investigated the clinical characteristics of patients with AU and intraocular presence of either RV or CMV determined by the Goldmann-Witmer coefficient (GWC). Our study included 100 patients (107 eyes) with AU and positive GWC for RV (86) and CMV (21). Clinical findings of RV-positive eyes were as follows: keratic precipitates (91.9%) with a predominantly diffuse distribution (81.4%), unilateral cataract (80.2%), pseudophakia (73.5%), and vitreous cells (59.7%), whereas heterochromia was present in only 39.5% of eyes and iris atrophy in 12.9% of eyes. In CMV-positive eyes, conversely, a higher incidence of ocular hypertension with markedly increased intraocular pressures above 30 mmHg (66.7%), keratic precipitates (81.0%), which were most commonly distributed in the center of the cornea (63.6%), an unaffected lens (55.0%), absent iris atrophy (100%), and absent posterior synechiae (90.5%) could be detected. This indicates a clinical presentation that was mainly compatible with Posner-Schlossman syndrome. In our cohort of RV-positive FUS patients, we saw a different cluster of clinical findings compared to the classification criteria suggested by the SUN Working Group. The main criteria, such as unilaterality, were mostly fulfilled. When applying all classification criteria, only 8.4% of 107 eyes and 10.5% of all 86 RV-positive eyes would qualify for the diagnosis of FUS. In addition, in our cohort of predominantly Caucasian patients, the clinical findings in patients with proven CMV infection differed from the clinical presentation typically associated with FUS.

Longitudinal Comparison of Constant Artifacts in Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Patients with Posterior Uveitis Compared to Healthy Subjects.

Background: Knowledge about artifacts in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is important to avoid misinterpretations. An overview of possible artifacts in posterior uveitis provides important information for interpretations. Methods: In this monocentric prospective study, OCTA images from a total of 102 eyes of 54 patients with posterior uveitis, and an age-matched control group including 34 healthy subjects (67 eyes), were evaluated (day 0, month 3, month 6). We assigned different artifacts to distinct layers. Various types of artifacts were examined in different retinal layers. The χ2 test for the comparison between the control and uveitis group and Cochran's Q test for the longitudinal comparison within the uveitis group were used. Results: A total of 2238 images were evaluated; 1836 from uveitis patients and 402 from healthy subjects. A total of 2193 artifacts were revealed. Projection (812 [36.3%]), segmentation (579 [25.9%]), shadowing (404 [18.1%]), and blink artifacts (297 [13.3%]) were the most common artifact types. The uveitis group displayed significantly more segmentation artifacts and projection artifacts (p < 0.001). No segmentation artifacts were documented in healthy subjects. The consecutive examinations within the uveitis group revealed the same artifact types without significance (p > 0.1). Conclusions: The uveitis patients showed more segmentation and projection artifacts than the control group. Within the uveitis group, artifacts remained longitudinally constant in terms of artifact type and pattern. The artifacts therefore appear to be reproducible on an individual level.

Findings and Graduation of Sarcoidosis-Related Uveitis: A Single-Center Study.

Ocular involvement is present in up to 79% of sarcoid patients. Uveitis is the main ocular manifestation and presents as a chronic intraocular inflammatory condition with potentially detrimental effects on visual acuity and quality of life. This retrospective study was conducted to explore the incidence and characteristics of ocular sarcoidosis in a single tertiary ophthalmology center. Medical records of 84 patients presenting between June 2007 and March 2021 were analyzed. Based on the "International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis" (IWOS) criteria, ocular sarcoidosis was determined as: definite (n = 24; 28.6%), presumed (n = 33; 39.3%), probable (n = 10; 11.9%), and indefinite (n = 17; 20.2%) in our study population. In 43.9% of the definite and presumed cases, the eye was primarily affected. In addition to specific ocular findings, the diagnosis was supported by biopsy (28.6%) and chest x-ray or computer tomography (66.7%). Moreover, an increased soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) expression (76.2%), elevated angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) levels (34.8%), and lymphocytopenia (35.1%) were valuable laboratory findings. Co-affected organs were lungs (60.7%), skin (15.5%), and central nervous system (8.3%). Our findings support the prominent role of the eye in the early detection of sarcoidosis. In addition to the IWOS criteria, sIL-2R, in particular, was shown to be relevant in establishing the diagnosis.

Corneal higher-order aberrations after cataract surgery: Manual phacoemulsification versus femtosecond-laser assisted technique.

PURPOSE: To compare and evaluate corneal higher-order aberrations (c-HOA) between conventional manual phacoemulsification (Phaco), femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS), and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with astigmatic keratotomy (FSAK). METHODS: In this retrospective single center study, 53 healthy individuals with cataract (73 eyes) underwent phacoemulsification with implantation of an intraocular lens. Three groups were formed: group A, Phaco (n = 27 eyes of 21 patients); group B, FLACS (n = 25 eyes of 15 patients); group C, FSAK (n = 21 eyes of 17 patients). An iTrace aberrometer (Tracey Technologies, Houston, TX, USA) was used to perform aberrometry with a pupil scan size of 5.0 mm. We used ANOVA analysis and the paired sample t-test for statistical analysis. RESULTS: There was no difference in total c-HOA between the groups prior to surgery (F(2,66) = 2.2, p = 0.128), but some evidence for a difference between the groups after surgery (F(2,65) = 3.87, p = 0.025). After surgery, total c-HOA increased in all groups, but the greatest increase occurred FSAK. CONCLUSION: Manual phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery seem to have less impact on corneal higher-order aberrations than the combination of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with astigmatic keratotomy.