Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 60(6): 3333-9, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26976870

RESUMEN

Surotomycin (formerly called CB-183,315) is a novel, orally administered cyclic lipopeptide antibacterial in development for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) that has potent activity against vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) but limited activity against Gram-negative bacilli, including Bacteroides spp. We used a mouse model to investigate the impact of surotomycin exposure on the microbiome, and to test the consequences of the disruption on colonization by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-KP), in comparison with the effects of oral vancomycin and metronidazole. Mice (8 per group) received saline, vancomycin, metronidazole, or surotomycin through an orogastric tube daily for 5 days and were challenged with 10(5) CFU of VRE or ESBL-KP administered through an orogastric tube on day 2 of treatment. The concentrations of the pathogens in stool were determined during and after treatment by plating on selective media. A second experiment was conducted to determine if the antibiotics would inhibit established VRE colonization. In comparison to controls, oral vancomycin promoted VRE and ESBL-KP overgrowth in stool (8 log10 to 10 log10 CFU/g; P < 0.001), whereas metronidazole did not (<4 log10 CFU/g; P > 0.5). Surotomycin promoted ESBL-KP overgrowth (>8 log10 CFU/g; P, <0.001 for comparison with saline controls) but not VRE overgrowth. Surotomycin suppressed preexisting VRE colonization, whereas metronidazole and vancomycin did not. These results suggest that treatment of CDI with surotomycin could reduce levels of VRE acquisition and overgrowth from those with agents such as vancomycin and metronidazole. However, surotomycin and vancomycin may promote colonization by antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacilli.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Lipopéptidos/farmacología , Péptidos Cíclicos/farmacología , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Metronidazol/farmacología , Ratones , Vancomicina/farmacología , Resistencia a la Vancomicina
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 60(7): 3988-93, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27090175

RESUMEN

The use of oral vancomycin or metronidazole for treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) may promote colonization by health care-associated pathogens due to disruption of the intestinal microbiota. Because the macrocyclic antibiotic fidaxomicin causes less alteration of the intestinal microbiota than vancomycin, we hypothesized that it would not lead to a loss of colonization resistance to vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and extended-spectrum-ß-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-Kp). Mice (8 per group) received orogastric saline, vancomycin, or fidaxomicin daily for 5 days at doses resulting in stool concentrations in mice similar to those measured in humans. The mice were challenged with 10(5) CFU of orogastric VRE or ESBL-Kp on day 2 of treatment and concentrations of the pathogens in stool were monitored. The impact of drug exposure on the microbiome was measured by cultures, real-time PCR for selected anaerobic bacteria, and deep sequencing. In comparison to saline controls, oral vancomycin promoted establishment of high-density colonization by VRE and ESBL-Kp in stool (8 to 10 log10 CFU/g; P < 0.001), whereas fidaxomicin did not (<4 log10 CFU; P > 0.5). Vancomycin treatment resulted in significant reductions in enterococci, Bacteroides spp., and Clostridium leptum, whereas the population of aerobic and facultative Gram-negative bacilli increased; deep-sequencing analysis demonstrated suppression of Firmicutes and expansion of Proteobacteria during vancomycin treatment. Fidaxomicin did not cause significant alteration of the microbiota. In summary, in contrast to vancomycin, fidaxomicin treatment caused minimal disruption of the intestinal microbiota and did not render the microbiota susceptible to VRE and ESBL-Kp colonization.


Asunto(s)
Aminoglicósidos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Intestinos/microbiología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/efectos de los fármacos , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Aminoglicósidos/farmacología , Animales , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infecciones por Bacteroides/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacteroides/microbiología , Clostridium/efectos de los fármacos , Clostridium/patogenicidad , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Fidaxomicina , Firmicutes/efectos de los fármacos , Firmicutes/patogenicidad , Klebsiella pneumoniae/patogenicidad , Ratones , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Vancomicina/farmacología , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/patogenicidad , beta-Lactamasas/genética , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA