Efficacy of the Cytokine Adsorption Therapy in Patients with Severe COVID-19-Associated Pneumonia: Lesson Learned from a Prospective Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Severe COVID-19 pneumonia can activate a cytokine storm. Hemoperfusion can reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines in sepsis but is still debated in the COVID-19 setting. Thus, we sought to investigate the benefits of HA-330 cytokine adsorption through clinical and laboratory outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a single-center prospective observational study in adults with severe COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit at Chiang Mai University Hospital (Chiang Mai, Thailand). Those with cytokine storms indicated by organ injury, including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and high inflammatory markers were included. Patients treated with the HA-330 device were classified as a hemoperfusion group, while those without cytokine adsorption were classified as a control group. We compared the outcomes on day 7 after treatment and evaluated the factors associated with 60-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were enrolled. Thirty-eight patients received hemoperfusion, while 74 patients did not. Baseline cytokine storm parameters were comparable. In univariate analysis, there was an improvement in clinical and laboratory effects from hemoperfusion therapy. In multivariate analysis, APACHE II score, SOFA score, PaO2/FiO2, the number of hemoperfusion sessions, the amount of blood purified, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and IL-6 were associated with mortality. Using at least 3 sessions of hemoperfusion could mitigate, the 60-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.33, p = 0.001). By categorizing the amount of blood treated into 3 groups of <1 L/kg, 1-2 L/kg, and ≥2 L/kg, there was a linear dose-response association with survival, which was better in the higher volume purified (mortality 60% vs. 33.3% vs. 0%, respectively, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: The early initiation of HA-330 hemoperfusion could improve the severity score and laboratory outcomes of COVID-19 ARDS. The optimal dose of at least three sessions or the amount of blood purified greater than 1 L/kg was associated with a reduction in 60-day mortality.

Survival rates in comprehensive conservative care compared to dialysis therapy in elderly end-stage kidney disease patients: a propensity score analysis.

Initiating dialysis therapy in elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is a challenging decision. We aimed to examine the mortality rates among elderly patients who underwent hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or comprehensive conservative care. This retrospective cohort study included elderly patients (≥70 years) with ESKD who selected their treatment options from January 2008 to December 2018. Patients were categorized into three groups: hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and comprehensive conservative care. The outcome of interest was all-cause mortality analyzed using flexible parametric survival models. Propensity score analysis with inverse probability treatment weighting technique was performed, incorporating age, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. The study included 719 elderly ESKD patients with mean age of 78.2 ± 4.9 years, 52.3% were male, and 60.1% died during the median follow-up period of 22.1 months. In a fully adjusted model, patients receiving comprehensive conservative care (n = 50) had higher mortality rates than those receiving hemodialysis (n = 317) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 5.60; 95% CI 2.26-13.84, p < 0.001). However, patients who received peritoneal dialysis (n = 352) had a similar mortality rate when compared to those who received hemodialysis (adjusted HR 1.38; 95% CI 0.78-2.44, p = 0.275). The higher mortality rate in the comprehensive conservative care group remained significantly higher than in the hemodialysis group among patients aged ≥80 years (adjusted HR 4.97; 95% CI 1.32-18.80, p = 0.018). Among elderly patients (≥70 years), treatment with dialysis was associated with longer survival rates. This survival advantage persisted in patients aged ≥80 years who chose hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis over comprehensive conservative care.

Mitochondria and vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease: Lessons learned from the past to improve future therapy.

Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorders (CKD-MBD) is a common complication of CKD Stages 3-5. Hyperphosphatemia is one of the major metabolic components of CKD-MBD, frequently resulting in vascular calcification (VC) in advanced-stage patients. Also, a long duration of renal replacement therapy can cause the worsening of VC, leading to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Vascular smooth muscle cells play an important role in the development of VC through osteochondrogenic transformation and the apoptotic process. It has been shown that mitochondrial dysfunction is involved with CKD progression, and excessive oxidative stress can aggravate osteoblastic transformation and VC. Currently, novel interventions targeting mitochondrial function and dynamics, in addition to mitochondrial antioxidants, have been studied with the aim of attenuating VC. This review aims to comprehensively summarize and discuss the experimental and clinical reports concerning mitochondrial studies, along with the purpose of interventions that can improve the outcomes of VC among CKD patients.

Correction: Narongkiatikhun et al. Immunogenicity and Safety of Homologous and Heterologous Prime-Boost of CoronaVac® and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 among Hemodialysis Patients: An Observational Prospective Cohort Study. Vaccines 2023, 11, 175.

The authors wish to make the following correction to this paper [...].

Immunogenicity and Safety of Homologous and Heterologous Prime-Boost of CoronaVac® and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 among Hemodialysis Patients: An Observational Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Vaccines that prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection are considered the most promising approach to modulating the pandemic. There is scarce evidence on the efficacy and safety of different vaccine prime-boost combinations in MHD patients since most clinical trials have used homologous mRNA vaccine regimens. METHODS: This prospective observational study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of homologous CoronaVac® (SV-SV), ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) (AZ-AZ), and the heterologous prime-boost of SV-AZ, among MHD patients. RESULTS: A total of 130 MHD participants were recruited. On day 28, after the second dose, seroconversion results of the surrogate virus neutralization test were not different between vaccine regimens. The magnitude of the receptor-binding domain-specific IgG was highest among the SV-AZ. Different vaccine regimens had a distinct impact on seroconversion, for which the heterologous vaccine regimen demonstrated a higher probability of seroconversion (OR 10.12; p = 0.020, and OR 1.81; p = 0.437 for SV-AZ vs. SV-SV, and SV-AZ vs. AZ-AZ, respectively). There were no serious adverse events reported in any of the vaccine groups. CONCLUSIONS: Immunization with SV-SV, AZ-AZ, and SV-AZ could generate humoral immunity without any serious adverse events among MHD patients. Using the heterologous vaccine prime-boost seemed to be more efficacious in terms of inducing immunogenicity.