Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 19(10): 1517-21, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23891749

RESUMEN

Analyses of healthy donors of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) and of patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation have suggested that individuals harboring the CXCL12-A allele mobilize a higher number of CD34 + HSPCs after G-CSF administration. We typed 463 healthy unrelated donors (376 men and 87 women) who had received daily subcutaneous injections at a mean dose of 7.36 ± 1.71 µg/kg G-CSF for 5 days for CXCL12 801 G/A using a real-time PCR assay. Interestingly, the median concentration of mobilized CD34 + cells on day 5 was almost identical in donors with the A-allele (79/µL; range, 11 to 249/µL) and the G/G-group (82/µL; range, 15 to 268/µL). In addition, the allelic distribution was not different in donors (n = 11) who mobilized less than 20/µL CD34 + cells. No difference in the overall yield of CD34 + cells in the apheresis product and in the number of CD34 + cells/kg recipient could be detected between both groups. In a multivariate regression model for the endpoint CD34 + cells/µL at day 5, only male sex (regression coefficient, 11.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.7 to 21.2, P = .021) and body mass index as continuous variables (regression coefficient, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.5 to 4.5, P = .0001) but not age, smoking status, or CXCL12 allelic status represented independent variables. Our data derived from a large well-controlled cohort contradict previous analyses suggesting an association between CXCL12 allelic status and the yield of CD34 + HSPC after G-CSF mobilization. Concentration of CD34 + cells in the peripheral blood, the most objective parameter, could not be predicted by CXCL12 genotype.


Asunto(s)
Quimiocina CXCL12/genética , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Quimiocina CXCL12/inmunología , Femenino , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polimorfismo Genético , Factores Sexuales , Donantes de Tejidos , Adulto Joven
2.
Transfusion ; 52(12): 2600-5, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22500612

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection is accepted as a routine procedure in related and unrelated healthy donors worldwide. Venous access can be accomplished by peripheral veins or a central venous catheter (CVC). STUDY DESING AND METHODS: We compared efficacy and tolerability of 40 PBSC collections via CVC with 6267 PBSC collections via peripheral veins in healthy allogeneic donors. Results of the leukapheresis procedures and side effects in the donors were evaluated. RESULTS: The median CD34+ cell counts on Day 5 and the results of the stem cell collection were not significantly different between the two groups of allogeneic donors. Pain or problems at the site of puncture or catheter insertion occurred in 58.6% of the donors with a CVC versus 37.8% of the donors with peripheral venous access (p = 0.03). The incidence and severity of paresthesia during the leukapheresis was not significantly different in both groups of donors (p = 0.09). During follow-up no major adverse events related to CVC were reported. CONCLUSION: Central femoral lines proved to be safe and tolerable in healthy allogeneic donors but peripheral venous access should be preferred, whenever possible.


Asunto(s)
Donantes de Sangre , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/citología , Leucaféresis/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estadística & datos numéricos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética/métodos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Parestesia/epidemiología , Parestesia/prevención & control , Trasplante Homólogo , Adulto Joven
3.
Haematologica ; 90(12): 1665-71, 2005 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16330441

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Short-term treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been established as the standard regimen for mobilizing allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) from healthy donors. The pegylated form of filgrastim (pegfilgrastim) has a longer elimination half-life because of decreased serum clearance and might be a convenient alternative for stem cell mobilization. DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-five family (n=15) or unrelated (n=10) healthy donors received a single-dose of 12 mg pegfilgrastim for mobilization of allogeneic PBPC. Donors with inadequate mobilization (blood CD34+ cells

Asunto(s)
Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/farmacología , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética , Donadores Vivos , Adulto , Anciano , Antígenos CD34/análisis , Evaluación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Filgrastim , Citometría de Flujo , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/prevención & control , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/efectos adversos , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética/efectos adversos , Humanos , Interleucina-10/metabolismo , Leucaféresis , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Monocitos/metabolismo , Dolor/inducido químicamente , Dimensión del Dolor , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre Periférica/efectos adversos , Polietilenglicoles , Proteínas Recombinantes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esplenomegalia/inducido químicamente , Linfocitos T Reguladores/metabolismo , Trasplante Homólogo/efectos adversos
5.
Transfusion ; 46(8): 1417-23, 2006 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16934080

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A single injection of pegfilgrastim has been shown to be equivalent to daily filgrastim in enhancing neutrophil recovery after chemotherapy, whereas the experiences with pegfilgrastim in mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) are limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty unselected patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma were treated with different chemotherapy regimens followed by 6 mg of pegfilgrastim for mobilization of autologous PBPCs. Patients with an inadequate mobilization (blood CD34+ cells

Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética , Linfoma/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre Periférica , Adulto , Anciano , Carmustina/administración & dosificación , Citarabina/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Filgrastim , Humanos , Masculino , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polietilenglicoles , Proteínas Recombinantes , Inducción de Remisión , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA