Multicenter evaluation of the role of UroVysion FISH assay in surveillance of patients with bladder cancer: does FISH positivity anticipate recurrence?

BACKGROUND: The significance of a positive UroVysion FISH assay is uncertain in patients with normal cystoscopy. This multicenter study evaluates the clinical significance of a positive FISH assay in patients with no visible tumor and excluding those with a positive cytology. METHODS: A multi-institutional, retrospective study of patients with a history of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder identified 664 patients with a FISH assay after excluding those with cystoscopic evidence of a tumor and/or positive cytology. Our primary end point was cancer recurrence, defined by biopsy. Progression was defined as recurrence with a tumor stage ≥T2. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test as a one-tailed test and Chi-square test with significance at 0.05, using SPSS(®) version 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). RESULTS: Of the 664 patients in this study, tumor stage was Ta (363, 55 %), T1 (183, 28 %), and CIS (109, 16 %) and most were high grade (440 pts, 66 %). The median follow-up was 26 months (3-104 months), and 277 (41.7 %) patients were recurred. In patients who were FISH positive, mean time to recurrence was 12.6 months, compared to 17.9 months if FISH negative (p = 0.03). In univariate analysis, atypical cytology, positive FISH, cystoscopic findings (atypical vs. normal), and previous intravesical therapy were associated with recurrence (p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, pathologic stage, cystoscopic findings, and cytology were independently associated with recurrence (p < 0.05). Progression to ≥T2 disease occurred in 34 (5.1 %) patients in this cohort. On multivariate analysis, only initial T stage and FISH result were found to be independent predictors of progression (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a positive FISH and atypical cytology are more likely to recur even in the absence of visible tumor. FISH positivity may portend a higher risk for progression. These findings require prospective validation.

Daily Caffeine Consumption Is Associated with Decreased Incidence of Symptoms and Hemodynamic Changes During Pharmacologic Stress with Regadenoson.

Regadenoson is an adenosine A2A receptor agonist widely used as a pharmacologic stress agent for myocardial perfusion imaging. Approximately 3.4 million regadenoson pharmacologic stress tests were performed annually as of 2011. Caffeine is a competitive antagonist of all adenosine receptor subtypes; thus, caffeine is typically withheld 12-24 h before stress with regadenoson. However, the effects of daily caffeine intake on regadenoson stress are unknown. This study assessed the effects of daily caffeine intake on symptoms and hemodynamic changes during stress testing with regadenoson. Methods: Patients presenting for regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging were asked their amounts of daily caffeine intake. Chart review was used to collect data on demographics, comorbidities, and use of ß-blockers. Data collected from the regadenoson stress test included symptoms, administration of aminophylline, heart rate, blood pressure, and arrhythmias. χ2 testing and ANOVA were used to analyze data divided into 3 categories of caffeine intake (<200, 200-400, and >400 mg daily). χ2 testing was used for nominal data, and unpaired t testing was used for continuous data. Results: In total, 101 patients were enrolled: 53% men and 47% women. Of the 101 patients, 89% reported caffeine intake, with 13% reporting heavy caffeine intake (>400 mg daily). The last intake of caffeine was at least 12 h before the test. During the test, 63% of patients reported symptoms, but the test was completed successfully in all patients. Compared with those who do not use caffeine, intake for caffeine users was associated with less chest pain (P = 0.0013), less aminophylline administration (P = 0.0371), lower resting and peak heart rate (P = 0.0497 and 0.0314, respectively), and lower diastolic blood pressure response (P = 0.0468). No associations were found between caffeine intake and arrhythmia or systolic blood pressure response. Conclusion: The use of regadenoson stress for myocardial perfusion imaging in caffeine consumers is very common, safe, and associated with a lower incidence of certain symptoms than in non-caffeine consumers. Specifically, caffeine intake was associated with less aminophylline use and chest pain.