Dunnigan lipodystrophy syndrome: French National Diagnosis and Care Protocol (PNDS; Protocole National de Diagnostic et de Soins).

Dunnigan syndrome, or Familial Partial Lipodystrophy type 2 (FPLD2; ORPHA 2348), is a rare autosomal dominant disorder due to pathogenic variants of the LMNA gene. The objective of the French National Diagnosis and Care Protocol (PNDS; Protocole National de Diagnostic et de Soins), is to provide health professionals with a guide to optimal management and care of patients with FPLD2, based on a critical literature review and multidisciplinary expert consensus. The PNDS, written by members of the French National Reference Center for Rare Diseases of Insulin Secretion and Insulin Sensitivity (PRISIS), is available on the French Health Authority website (in French). Dunnigan syndrome is characterized by a partial atrophy of the subcutaneous adipose tissue and by an insulin resistance syndrome, associated with a risk of metabolic, cardiovascular and muscular complications. Its prevalence, assessed at 1/100.000 in Europe, is probably considerably underestimated. Thorough clinical examination is key to diagnosis. Biochemical testing frequently shows hyperinsulinemia, abnormal glucose tolerance and hypertriglyceridemia. Elevated hepatic transaminases (hepatic steatosis) and creatine phosphokinase, and hyperandrogenism in women, are common. Molecular analysis of the LMNA gene confirms diagnosis and allows for family investigations. Regular screening and multidisciplinary monitoring of the associated complications are necessary. Diabetes frequently develops from puberty onwards. Hypertriglyceridemia may lead to acute pancreatitis. Early atherosclerosis and cardiomyopathy should be monitored. In women, polycystic ovary syndrome is common. Overall, the management of patients with Dunnigan syndrome requires the collaboration of several health care providers. The attending physician, in conjunction with the national care network, will ensure that the patient receives optimal care through regular follow-up and screening. The various elements of this PNDS are described to provide such a support.

Cholangiopathy in critically ill patients surviving beyond the intensive care period: a multicentre survey in liver units.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of cholangiopathy developing in intensive care unit (ICU) is not known in patients surviving their ICU stay. AIM: To perform a survey in liver units, in order to clarify the course of cholangiopathy after surviving ICU stay. METHODS: The files of the liver units affiliated to the French network for vascular liver disease were screened for cases of ICU cholangiopathy developing in patients with normal liver function tests on ICU admission, and no prior history of liver disease. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2015, 16 cases were retrieved. Extensive burns were the cause for admission to ICU in 11 patients. Serum alkaline phosphatase levels increased from day 11 (2-46) to a peak of 15 (4-32) × ULN on day 81 (12-511). Magnetic resonance cholangiography showed irregularities or frank stenosis of the intrahepatic ducts, and proximal extrahepatic ducts contrasting with a normal aspect of the distal common bile duct. Follow-up duration was 20.6 (4.7-71.8) months. Three patients were lost to follow-up; 2 patients died from liver failure and no patient was transplanted. One patient had worsening strictures of the intrahepatic bile ducts with jaundice. Nine patients had persistent but minor strictures of the intrahepatic bile ducts on MR cholangiography, and persistent cholestasis without jaundice. One patient had normal liver function tests. CONCLUSIONS: In patients surviving their ICU stay, ICU cholangiopathy is not uniformly fatal in the short term or clinically symptomatic in the medium term. Preservation of the distal common bile duct appears to be a finding differentiating ICU cholangiopathy from other diffuse cholangiopathies.

Insulin resistance is a cause of steatosis and fibrosis progression in chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance is a frequent feature of chronic hepatitis C. Whether insulin resistance could be the cause or consequence of steatosis and fibrosis is unknown. The ability of HCV genotype 3 to promote steatosis by itself provides an unique opportunity to answer this question. AIMS: The aim of the present study was to assess the relationships between insulin resistance, steatosis, and fibrosis according to genotype in 141 non-diabetic patients with biopsy proven non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: All patients had fasting serum glycaemia and insulinaemia measurements. Insulin resistance was evaluated using the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA IR) method. Liver steatosis was determined according to hepatitis C virus genotype (1 or 3). Logistic regression and multivariate regression analysis were used to identify variables independently associated with insulin resistance, fatty liver, and fibrosis. RESULTS: Although steatosis and fibrosis were more severe in genotype 3 patients, median HOMA IR was significantly higher in patients with genotype 1 related steatosis than in those with genotype 3 related steatosis (2.1 v 1; p = 0.001). Independent risk factors for steatosis were insulin resistance in genotype 1 patients (p = 0.001) and viral load in genotype 3 patients (p = 0.003). Among genotype 1 patients, independent parameters associated with insulin resistance were age (p = 0.04) and steatosis (p = 0.004). Steatosis was associated with more severe fibrosis whatever the genotype (p = 0.002). Among genotype 1 patients, although there was a significant relationship between circulating insulin level and fibrosis stage (p = 0.006), only steatosis and inflammatory score were independently associated with fibrosis. CONCLUSION: This study shows that insulin resistance is the cause rather than the consequence of steatosis and fibrosis in genotype 1 patients and that increased circulating insulin is a risk factor for fibrosis through insulin resistance induced steatosis.

Risk factors for cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection: results of a case-control study.

The role of the viral genotype, especially genotype 1b, in the severity of liver injury induced by chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is unclear, probably because of confounding factors such as the date and mode of contamination. Host genetic or environmental factors such as heterozygous MZ alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency or alcoholism, could also be potential risk factors for the development of cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of genotypes, alpha1-antitrypsin phenotype, past hepatitis B virus infection, and alcohol consumption in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C. We conducted a case-control study comparing 84 consecutive cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C (cases) with 84 noncirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C (controls) selected from a cohort of 464 patients hospitalized during the same period. Controls were paired with cases according to age, sex, risk factors, and date of infection. HCV genotypes were determined using the InnoLiPA technique (Innogenetics, Zwijnaarde, Belgium) and classified according to the method of Simmonds. Patients were divided in three groups according to alcohol consumption: <30 g/d (light), 30 to 80 g/d (moderate), and >80 g/d (heavy). Cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients were not significantly different in terms of genotype distribution (1a/1b/2a/3a/others/undetermined: 10/48/7/17/0/2 versus 11/43/10/10/5/5), alpha1-antitrypsin phenotype distribution (MM/MS/MZ: 84%/14%/2% vs. 87%/11%/2%, respectively), and prevalence of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen positivity (29% vs. 23%). Alcohol consumption was significantly different between cases and controls (L/M/H: 58%/27%/16% vs. 76%/15%/9%, respectively; P < .05). Two conclusions regarding patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection can be drawn from this study: 1) viral genotype, especially 1b, past hepatitis B virus infection, and heterozygous MZ alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency are not risk factors for cirrhosis; and 2) alcohol consumption, even moderate, is a risk factor for cirrhosis.