Evaluation of co-trimoxazole in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Co-trimoxazole (SXT), a combination of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, has shown in vitro activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. However, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of SXT in multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) are, thus far, lacking. Therefore, we evaluated its pharmacokinetics and drug susceptibility, along with its tolerability during treatment. Based on drug susceptibility testing, MDR-TB patients received SXT as a part of their MDR treatment. The pharmacokinetic parameters of sulfamethoxazole, the effective component of SXT against M. tuberculosis, were evaluated. The ratio of the area under the curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was used as the best pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameter to predict the efficacy of sulfamethoxazole. Adverse effects of SXT were also evaluated. 10 patients with MDR-TB (one of whom had extensively drug-resistant TB) received 480 mg of SXT with a median dosage of 6.5 mg·kg(-1) of SXT (range 6.1-6.8 mg·kg(-1)) once daily for a median treatment period of 381 days (range 129-465 days). In two patients, the dose was escalated to 960 mg. The free AUC0-24/MIC of sulfamethoxazole exceeded 25 in only one patient. SXT was safe and well-tolerated, except for one patient who had gastrointestinal side-effects after receiving 960 mg of SXT. Additional studies are needed to find the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets, and consequently to set the optimal dose, of SXT for MDR-TB treatment.

Limited-sampling strategies for therapeutic drug monitoring of moxifloxacin in patients with tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: Moxifloxacin (MFX) is a potent drug for multidrug resistant tuberculosis(TB) treatment and is also useful if first-line agents are not tolerated. Therapeutic drug monitoring may help to prevent treatment failure. Obtaining a full concentration-time curve of MFX for therapeutic drug monitoring is not feasible in most settings. Developing a limited-sampling strategy based on population pharmacokinetics (PK) may help to overcome this problem. METHODS: Steady-state plasma concentrations after the administration of 400 mg of MFX once daily were determined in 21 patients with TB, using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. A one-compartment population model was generated and crossvalidated. Monte Carlo data simulation (n=1000) was used to calculate limited-sampling strategies. The correlation between predicted MFX AUC0-24h (area under the concentration-time curve 0 to 24 hours) and observed AUC0-24h was investigated by Bland-Altman analysis. Finally, the predictive performance of the final model was tested prospectively using MFX profiles from patients with TB receiving 400, 600, or 800 mg once daily. RESULTS: Median minimum inhibitory concentration of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates was 0.25 mg/L (interquartile range: 0.25-0.5 mg/L). The geometric mean AUC0-24h was 24.5 mg·h/L (range: 8.5-72.2 mg·h/L), which resulted in a geometric mean AUC0-24h/minimum inhibitory concentration ratio of 72 (range: 21-321). PK analysis, based on PK profiles of 400 mg of MFX once daily, resulted in a crossvalidated population PK model with the following parameters: apparent clearance (Cl) 18.5±8.6 L/h per 1.85 m, Vd 3.0±0.7 L/kg corrected lean body mass, Ka 1.15±1.16 h, and F was fixed at 1. After the Monte Carlo simulation, the best predicting strategy for MFX AUC0-24h for practical use was based on MFX concentrations 4 and 14 hours postdosing (r=0.90, prediction bias=-1.5%, and root mean square error=15%). CONCLUSIONS: MFX AUC0-24h in patients with TB can be predicted with acceptable accuracy for clinical management, using limited sampling. AUC0-24h prediction based on 2 samples, 4 and 14 hours postdose, can be used to individualize treatment.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of antimicrobial drugs: a systematic review on oxazolidinones, rifamycines, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and Beta-lactams.

Like any other drug, antimicrobial drugs are prone to pharmacokinetic drug interactions. These drug interactions are a major concern in clinical practice as they may have an effect on efficacy and toxicity. This article provides an overview of all published pharmacokinetic studies on drug interactions of the commonly prescribed antimicrobial drugs oxazolidinones, rifamycines, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and beta-lactams, focusing on systematic research. We describe drug-food and drug-drug interaction studies in humans, affecting antimicrobial drugs as well as concomitantly administered drugs. Since knowledge about mechanisms is of paramount importance for adequate management of drug interactions, the most plausible underlying mechanism of the drug interaction is provided when available. This overview can be used in daily practice to support the management of pharmacokinetic drug interactions of antimicrobial drugs.

Determination of moxifloxacin in human plasma, plasma ultrafiltrate, and cerebrospinal fluid by a rapid and simple liquid chromatography- tandem mass spectrometry method.

Moxifloxacin (MFX) is a useful agent in the treatment of multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). At Tuberculosis Centre Beatrixoord, a referral center for tuberculosis in the Netherlands, approximately 36% of the patients have received MFX as treatment. Based on the variability of MFX AUC, the variability of in vitro susceptibility to MFX of M. tuberculosis, and the variability of penetration into sanctuary sites, measuring the concentration of MFX in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) could be recommended. Therefore, a rapid and validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) analyzing method with a simple pretreatment procedure was developed for therapeutic drug monitoring of MFX in human plasma and CSF. Because of the potential influence of protein binding on efficacy, we decided to determine both bound and unbound (ultrafiltrate) fraction of MFX. The calibration curves were linear in the therapeutic range of 0.05 to 5.0 mg/L plasma and CSF with CV in the range of -5.4% to 9.3%. MFX ultrafiltrate samples could be determined with the same method setup for analysis of MFX in CSF. The LC-MS-MS method developed in this study is suitable for monitoring MFX in human plasma, plasma ultrafiltrate, and CSF.