A Pharmacist-Driven Glycemic Control Protocol to Reduce the Rate of Severe Hypoglycemia in High-Risk Patients.

Purpose: Hospital pharmacists contribute to patient safety and quality initiatives by overseeing the prescribing of antidiabetic medications. A pharmacist-driven glycemic control protocol was developed to reduce the rate of severe hypoglycemia events (SHE) in high-risk hospitalized patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the rates of SHE (defined as blood glucose ≤40 mg/dL), before and after instituting a pharmacist-driven glycemic control protocol over a 4-year period. A hospital glucose management team that included a lead Certified Diabetes Educator Pharmacist (CDEP), 5 pharmacists trained in diabetes, a lead hospitalist, critical care and hospital providers established a process to first identify patients at risk for severe hypoglycemia and then implement our protocol. Criteria from the American Diabetes Association and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists was utilized to identify and treat patients at risk for SHE. We analyzed and compared the rate of SHE and physician acceptance rates before and after protocol initiation. Results: From January 2015 to March 2019, 18 297 patients met criteria for this study; 139 patients experienced a SHE and approximately 80% were considered high risk diabetes patients. Physician acceptance rates for the new protocol ranged from 77% to 81% from the year of initiation (2016) through 2018. The absolute risk reduction of SHE was 9 events per 1000 hospitalized diabetic patients and the relative risk reduction was 74% SHE from the start to the end of the protocol implementation. Linear regression analysis demonstrated that SHE decreased by 1.5 events per 1000 hospitalized diabetic patients (95% confidence interval, -1.54 to -1.48, P < .001) during the 2 years following the introduction of the protocol. This represents a 15% relative reduction of SHE per year. Conclusion: The pharmacist-driven glycemic control protocol was well accepted by our hospitalists and led to a significant reduction in SHE in high-risk diabetes patient groups at our hospital. It was cost effective and strengthened our physician-pharmacist relationship while improving diabetes care.

Outcomes of 4-factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Patients With Liver Disease and Nonvitamin K Antagonist-Related Coagulopathy: A Retrospective Study.

The administration of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) has expanded beyond its Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indication for the emergent reversal of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the risks and benefits associated with the expanded use of 4F-PCC. We conducted a single-center retrospective review of 4F-PCC administrations at our university hospital. Of the 159 patients who received 4F-PCC, 76% (n = 121) and 24% (n = 38) received it for the FDA-approved indication in the vitamin K-related coagulopathy (VKA) group and for expanded use in the nonvitamin K-related coagulopathy (nVKA) group, respectively. The expanded use of 4F-PCC was associated with a less robust reduction in the international normalized ratio (INR) (INR of -0.7 ± 1.3 vs INR of -1.6 ± 1.8, P = .002), and fewer patients in the nVKA group achieved a postadministration INR of less than1.5 (11% vs 79%, P = .001) than those in the VKA group. Furthermore, the 30-day mortality rate was significantly higher in the nVKA cohort than in the VKA cohort (42% vs 20%, P = .04). Notably, based on our data, underlying differences in the patient's comorbidities, particularly advanced liver disease, may have contributed to the observed outcome variations, including mortality rate. Therefore, factors, including comorbidities and the underlying etiology of coagulopathy, should be considered when deciding on the expanded use of 4F-PCC. Further research is needed to better understand the potential risks and benefits of 4F-PCC in expanded use scenarios, and the clinical decision to use 4F-PCC outside its FDA-approved indication should be made carefully, considering this information.

A laparoscopic approach to address massive splenomegaly, symptomatic cholelithiasis, and a planned postoperative pregnancy: A case report.

We report long-term follow-up of a patient who underwent a tailored laparoscopic procedure for symptomatic cholelithiasis, massive splenomegaly, and a planned pregnancy. There were no complications, and the patient remained symptom-free at the 5-year follow-up. We supplemented our case report with national surgical data demonstrating the safety of laparoscopic splenectomy.

Castleman disease: A single-center case series.

BACKGROUND: Castleman disease (CD) is a rare lymphocytic disorder. Unicentric CD (UCD) has an excellent long-term prognosis after surgical excision; however, multicentric CD (MCD) has a severe clinical course with poor outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed the clinical presentation of 28 patients treated at a single institution from 1995 to 2017. Demographics, clinical variables, anatomical site, centricity, histopathology, immunochemistry, and surgical approach were reviewed. We evaluated the 5-year recurrence and survival for patients with UCD and MCD. RESULTS: Of the 28 patients, 57 % (n = 16) were female, with a mean age of 41.6 ± 15.6 years. CD was asymptomatic in 57 % (n = 16) of patients, 21 % (n = 6) presented with local symptoms such as pain, and 21 % (n = 6) of patients also had systemic symptoms, including weight loss and fever. CD was unicentric in 64 % (n = 18) and multicentric in 36 % (n = 10). The hyaline vascular variant was noted in 57 % (n = 16) of the tumors, plasmacytoid variant in 36 % (n = 10), and mixed variants in 7% (n = 2) of tumors. Anatomical distributions included: head and neck (20 %), thorax and axilla (24 %), retroperitoneal (13 %), abdominopelvic (30 %) regions, and other (13 %). Complete surgical resection was performed in 95 % of patients with UCD. Surgical biopsy and medical therapy were provided to all patients with MCD. The recurrence rate for UCD and MCD was 6 % (n = 1) and 14 % (n = 1), respectively. The five-year disease-free survival rate for UCD was 95 % (n = 19) and MCD was 33 % (n = 2). We found 100 % survival in patients with UCD and histology demonstrating the HV variant. CONCLUSION: CD is rare and often misdiagnosed due to the absence of specific clinical symptoms. Surgeons should include CD in their differential diagnoses when evaluating patients with lymph node hyperplasia. Surgery can be curative in nearly all patients with UCD. Patients with MCD require a combination of surgical therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy; however, cytoreductive surgery benefits for patients with MCD have not been established.