Recurrent hypoglycemia from insulin autoimmune syndrome.

Insulin autoimmune syndrome (IAS) is an uncommon cause of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia characterized by autoantibodies to endogenous insulin in individuals without previous exposure to exogenous insulin. IAS is the third leading cause of spontaneous hypoglycemia in Japan, and is increasingly being recognized worldwide in non-Asian populations. We report a case of IAS in a Caucasian woman with recurrent complaints of hypoglycemia, with laboratory findings of serum glucose 2.5 mmol/L (45 mg/dL), insulin 54,930 pmol/L (7,909 µIU/mL), connecting peptide (C-peptide) 4,104 pmol/L (12.4 ng/mL), and a corresponding insulin to C-peptide molar ratio of 13.4 during a spontaneous hypoglycemic event. Autoantibodies to insulin were markedly elevated at > 50 kU/L (> 50 U/mL). IAS should be considered in the differential diagnosis of hypoglycemia in non-diabetic individuals. Distinction from insulinoma is especially crucial to prevent unwarranted invasive procedures and surgical interventions in hypoglycemic patients.

Determining starting basal rates of insulin infusion for insulin pump users: a comparison between methods.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the accuracy and safety of presently available methods of estimating starting basal insulin rates for patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes, and to compare them against an empirically derived standard basal rate and a newly developed regression formula. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data on 61 patients with type 1 diabetes on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy and 34 patients with type 2 diabetes on CSII were reviewed. Patient data were first analyzed for correlations between initial patient parameters and final basal rates. Starting basal rates were then retrospectively calculated for these patients according to the weight-based method (WB-M), the total daily dose (TDD) of insulin method (TDD-M), a flat empiric value, and a new formula developed by regression analysis of clinical data. These 4 methods were subsequently compared in their accuracy and potential risk of hypoglycemia. RESULTS: For type 1 diabetes, patient weight and TDD of long-acting insulin correlated with final basal rates. Both the regression formula and the TDD-M appeared safer than the WB-M and empirical estimates. For type 2 diabetes, only patient TDD of long-acting insulin correlated with final basal rates. The regression formula was significantly more accurate for patients with type 2 diabetes overall, but the TDD-M estimate was marginally safer. CONCLUSIONS: The pre-existing TDD-M was found to be the safest presently recommended estimate of initial basal rates for pump initiation in both type 1 and 2 diabetes. The best-fit regression was found to have potential use for type 2 CSII initiation.