RESUMEN
Clinical ethics can be viewed as a practical discipline that provides a structured approach to assist healthcare practitioners in identifying, analysing and resolving ethical issues that arise in practice. Clinical ethics can therefore promote ethically sound clinical and organisational practices and decision-making, thereby contributing to health organisation and system quality improvement. In order to develop students' decision-making skills, as well as prepare them for practice, we decided to introduce a clinical ethics strand within an undergraduate medical curriculum. We designed a programme of clinical ethics activities for teaching and assessment purposes that involved using ethical frameworks to analyse hypothetical and real-life cases in uni- and inter- professional groups. In this paper, we draw on medical student feedback collected over 6 years to illustrate the appeal to students of learning clinical ethics. We also outline the range of benefits for students, healthcare organisations, and the field of clinical ethics arising from tomorrow's doctors experiencing clinical ethics early in their training. We conclude by briefly reflecting on how including clinical ethics within tomorrow's doctors curricular can secure and continue future engagement in clinical ethics support services in the UK, alongside the dangers of preparing students for organisational cultures that might not (yet) exist. We anticipate the findings presented in the paper will contribute to wider debates examining the impact of ethics teaching, and its ability to inform future doctors' practice.
Asunto(s)
Médicos , Estudiantes de Medicina , Curriculum , Atención a la Salud , Ética Médica , Humanos , Principios MoralesRESUMEN
The assessment of ventricular hypertrophy is an increasingly common indication for cardiac MR (CMR) in every day clinical practice. CMR is useful to confirm the presence of hypertrophy and to help to define the underlying cause through a combination of a detailed assessment of ventricular function and tissue characterising sequences. As well as being a useful diagnostic tool, some CMR imaging features are of prognostic significance. In this article, we review the typical appearances of common forms of ventricular hypertrophy, focussing principally on left ventricular hypertrophy, and demonstrate the techniques that can be used to differentiate one form of hypertrophy from another.
Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/diagnóstico , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/fisiopatología , Femenino , Gadolinio , Humanos , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Masculino , Pronóstico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a standard part of a cochlear implant assessment in most centres. While there is ample literature on the temporal bone-specific imaging that is required, the role of whole brain imaging has not been as fully studied. We present the first report of the incidence of associated brain abnormalities in the whole cochlear implant population, including adults and consider their significance. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 51 (12 adults and 39 children) sequential cases since we added whole brain MRI sequences to our cochlear implant assessment protocol. We reviewed the scans for abnormalities of the cochlea and cochlear nerve and a neuroradiologist reviewed the images of the whole brain sequences for further abnormalities. RESULTS: We identified abnormalities on the whole brain sequences in 21 (41%) of these patients, 5 of 12 adults (42%) and 16 of 39 children (41%). Thirty-six (71%) patients subsequently had at least one implant inserted, 13 with abnormalities on whole brain MRI (36%) and 23 without. Of the 15 patients who did not undergo subsequent implantation, 8 had positive findings on their whole brain MRI sequence (53%). There was no statistical difference in the probability of finding an abnormality on the whole brain MRI between those who did and those who did not go on to have an implant (P = 0.35). There were abnormalities within the inner ear in five patients. DISCUSSION: The abnormalities detected on the whole brain images are heterogenous and of wide ranging clinical significance ranging from truly incidental findings to abnormalities that are so severe that they may predict a very poor prognosis such that an implant may contribute little.