Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with and without COVID-19 during the pandemic: A retrospective cohort study from a tertiary referral hospital.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to detect the prevalence and specific characteristics of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, conducted in a tertiary hospital in Greece between May 2021 and October 2022, patients with CDI from COVID-19 and Internal Medicine wards were enrolled and compared based on epidemiological and disease-associated data. RESULTS: In total, 4322 patients were admitted, and 435 samples for CDI were analyzed, with 104/435 (23.9 %) sample positivity and 2.4 % prevalence. We observed an increased prevalence of CDI compared to the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic (prevalence = 1.7 %, p = 0.003). 35.6 % of the CDI patients were hospitalized in the COVID-19 ward and 64.4 % in the Internal Medicine ward. COVID-19 patients were younger (p = 0.02) with a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) compared to the Internal Medicine ward patients (p < 0.001). With regards to the origin of CDI cases, in the Internal Medicine ward, 68.7 % presented with Hospital-Onset CDI, 17.9 % with Community Onset-Healthcare Associated CDI and 13.4 % with Community Associated CDI, while in the COVID-19 ward, the respective percentages were 86.5 %, 5.4 % and 8.1 %. Finally, there was an increased CDI-related CFR (Case Fatality Ratio) in the Internal Medicine ward compared to the COVID-19 ward (28.4 % vs. 5.4 %, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Increased CDI prevalence and testing were observed compared to the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Lower CDI-related CFR was observed in patients with COVID-19, which may be credited to the patients' significantly lower median age and CCI, as well as to the majority of deaths being due to respiratory failure.

Helicobacter pylori infection diagnosis and management: current practices of Greek gastroenterologists.

Background: The diagnosis and management of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection vary significantly, depending on country, area, and specialty. The aim of this study was to record the current practices of Greek gastroenterologists in the screening and treatment of H. pylori infection. Method: An anonymous questionnaire consisting of 19 questions about the management of H. pylori infection was sent with the aid of the Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology to all members of the Society. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 180 gastroenterologists, with a response rate of 31.4%. Diagnostic tests to confirm H. pylori infection are ordered by >90% of the gastroenterologists for patients with current peptic ulcer disease, gastric lymphoma, family history of gastric cancer, and an endoscopic appearance suggestive of gastritis. Most gastroenterologists (55.8%) also tested for H. pylori in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Histopathology was the most preferred (60.6%) method when testing was decided during endoscopy, while urea breath test was the most preferred method (67.8%) regardless of endoscopy. Most gastroenterologists use quadruple eradication regimens supported by international guidelines (90%), while 65.6% of the physicians answered that they systematically recommend the addition of probiotics to standard therapy. Most physicians (82.8%) answered that they always confirm the eradication of the pathogen. Conclusions: The majority of Greek gastroenterologists conform to the recommendations of international guidelines regarding the diagnosis and management of H. pylori infection, except for the screening of patients with GERD. A considerable number of doctors use probiotics in addition to standard therapy.

Endoscopic sedation practices of Greek gastroenterologists: a nationwide survey.

BACKGROUND: Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy is rapidly evolving worldwide. However, this has led to significant disagreements, especially regarding the use of propofol by non-anesthesiologists. The aim of this study was to document the practices of Greek gastroenterologists regarding sedation and compare them to previous surveys. METHODS: The study was conducted in 2 periods, December 2015 and June 2018. In each period, the same online questionnaire regarding endoscopic sedation practices was sent to all registered Greek gastroenterologists (509 and 547 gastroenterologists, respectively). RESULTS: The response rates were 38.3% and 47.1%, respectively. In each period, 25.1% and 16.7% of physicians did not use sedation. Most gastroenterologists (approx. 70% in both instances) answered that they "almost never" collaborate with an anesthesiologist during endoscopy. Midazolam was by far the most popular sedation agent, used by almost 90% of physicians in both periods. Propofol was used by 30.8% and 27% of physicians, respectively. Physicians using propofol were significantly more satisfied with the sedation than other physicians, while propofol was the agent selected by most physicians if they were to undergo endoscopy themselves. Most physicians cited medicolegal reasons and inadequate training as chief reasons for not using propofol. CONCLUSIONS: Sedation use is widespread among Greek gastroenterologists. Although midazolam is the most commonly used agent, propofol is preferred (theoretically) by most physicians and achieves the best satisfaction. The introduction of a strict training curriculum for endoscopic sedation can effectively eliminate the barriers preventing gastroenterologists from administering propofol, while at the same time ensuring optimal patient safety during endoscopy.

Peginterferon alfa-2b as monotherapy or in combination with lamivudine in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: a randomised study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of pegylated interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with lamivudine for the treatment of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) negative (-) chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is understudied. MATERIAL/METHODS: One hundred twenty-six patients with HBeAg(-)chronic hepatitis B received pegylated interferon alfa-2b > or =1.5 micro g/kg/wk for 48 weeks. Ninety of those subjects were randomly selected to receive concomitant treatment with lamivudine 100 mg/d. The coprimary end points were the subjects' virologic (hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid [HBV DNA] <60 IU/mL) and biochemical (normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels) responses 24 weeks after treatment cessation. RESULTS: The scores for necroinflammatory activity and fibrosis in patients randomly assigned to receive monotherapy were statistically significantly lower than those in patients receiving combination therapy. HBV DNA levels were statistically significantly higher and alanine aminotransferase levels were statistically significantly lower in patients receiving monotherapy than in those receiving combination therapy. Virologic responses in the monotherapy and combination therapy groups were similar at weeks 48 and 72 (59.1 vs 42.9%). The biochemical response at week 72 was also similar in the treatment groups. The results of multiple regression analysis showed that the virologic response at week 72 was independently correlated with the pegylated interferon alfa-2b dose and that the biochemical response was independently correlated with necroinflammatory activity, the pegylated interferon alfa-2b dose, and lamivudine therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the use of pegylated interferon alfa-2b in patients with HBeAg(-) chronic hepatitis B; however, the concomitant use of lamivudine produced no additional clinical benefit.