RESUMEN
PURPOSE: There has been a lot of controversies about the correlation between vitamin D and colorectal cancer (CRC). In this meta-analysis, we purposed to explore the relationship between vitamin D and the incidence of CRC/the prognosis of CRC. METHODS: A systematic search for articles in databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, EBSCO and Cochrane Library) was terminated in April 2020. The primary outcomes were the incidence rate of CRC and the long-term survival of patients with CRC. RESULTS: According to the estimated pooled OR from 21 eligible studies, covering 904,152 people, the use of vitamin D was inversely associated with the incidence of CRC [OR = 0.87, (0.82-0.92)]. Among the four studies included in this meta-analysis, covering 7486 patients, compared the overall survival (OS) of CRC between the vitamin D users and the non-users. Based on the estimated pooled HR, vitamin D potentially improved the long-term survival of CRC patients [HR = 0.91, (0.83-0.98)]. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates that vitamin D not only has a positive impact on the incidence of CRC from either the dietary or supplemental sources but also benefits clinical outcomes and improves the long-term survival of CRC patients. However, further studies are recommended to clarify the above phenomena.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Vitamina D , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , PronósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with localized prostate cancer (LPCa) after treatment mainly surgery and radiotherapy (RT) has received increasing attention. The aim of this study is to compare the HRQoL of LPCa after surgery and RT. METHODS: Web of Science, Embase, PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched after January 2000 to observe the HRQoL scores after surgery and RT at different treatment time points. RESULTS: A total of 28 studies were included in this study, and the results showed that LPCa received surgery had better bowel scores than RT at ≤3 (weighted mean differences [WMD] = 4.18; p = 0.03), 3-6 (WMD = 4.16; p < 0.001), 6-12 (WMD = 2.99; p = 0.004), 24-60 (WMD = 1.87; p = 0.06), and ≥60 (WMD = 4.54; p = 0.02) months. However, LPCa received RT had higher urinary scores at ≤3 (WMD = -7.39; p = 0.02), 3-6 (WMD = -6.03; p = 0.02), 6-12 (WMD = -4.90; p < 0.001), 24-60 (WMD = -3.96; p < 0.001), ≥60 (WMD = -2.95; p < 0.001) months and had better sexual scores at ≤3 (WMD = -13.58; p = 0.09), 3-6 (WMD = -12.32; p = 0.06), 6-12 (WMD = -12.03; p = 0.002), 24-60 (WMD = -11.29; p < 0.001), and ≥60 (WMD = -3.10; p = 0.46) months than surgery. The scores difference between surgery and RT decreased over time. CONCLUSION: Overall, for LPCa, surgery was associated with better HRQoL in the bowel domain, whereas RT was associated with better HRQoL in the urinary and sexual domains, with the difference between surgery and RT narrowing over time.
RESUMEN
The correlation between vitamin D intake and lung cancer development is controversial. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the relationship between vitamin D and the prognosis and incidence of lung cancer. A comprehensive database search on PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library was carried out from the beginning to November 2020. Long-term survival and the incidence rate of patients with lung cancer were the primary outcomes of the study. Ten eligible studies were selected for the meta-analysis following specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Four included studies, covering 5,007 patients, compared the overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) of lung cancer patients among total vitamin D users with non-users. Significantly, the estimated pooled hazard ratio (HR) revealed that vitamin D could improve OS and RFS of lung cancer patients [HR=0.83, 95% CI (0.72-0.95); HR=0.79, 95% CI (0.61-0.97), respectively]. Vitamin D intake was inversely associated with lung cancer incidence in six studies [OR=0.90, 95% CI (0.83-0.97)]. The present meta-analysis shows vitamin D not only improves the long-term survival of lung cancer patients but has a beneficial effect on the incidence of lung cancer. Notwithstanding, more studies are needed to confirm the study results.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Vitamina D , Humanos , Incidencia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Pronóstico , VitaminasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is the major type of stroke, which highly risks human health and life quality. Governor vessel acupuncture (GV Ac) is one specific acupoint selection treatment. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical value of GV Ac in AIS patients. METHODS: Seven electronic databases were searched for all related randomized controlled trials before December 2020. The included studies should meet the following criteria: all target patients were diagnosed as AIS; the experimental group used GV Ac as the only intervention or combined with routine neurology therapy as conventional treatment; the control group received ordinary acupuncture, or the same conventional treatment as the experimental group, or both. Evaluated the quality of all included trials and performed a meta-analysis of the extracted data. RESULTS: A total of 18 trials were included, involving 1,543 AIS patients. The results showed compared to the conventional treatment, GV Ac combining with conventional therapy resulted in Barthel Index (BI) (MD =14.16, 95% CI: 7.34, 20.79) improvement, mRS (MD =-0.63, 95% CI: -0.95, -0.32, P<0.0001) decrease, better National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (MD =-1.18, 95% CI: -1.52, -0.83), and lower China Stroke Score (CSS)/Modified Edinburgh-Scandinavia Stroke Scale (MESSS) scores (MD =-3.77, 95% CI: -4.98, -2.57). Furthermore, GV Ac could better improve activities of daily living (ADL) (MD =8.27, 95% CI: 4.29, 12.26) and neurological deficit scores (NIHSS: MD =-1.32, 95% CI: -2.18, -0.47; CSS/MESSS: MD =-4.63, 95% CI: -5.91, -3.35), when compared to the ordinary acupuncture. DISCUSSION: According to the current evidence, GV Ac for AIS's efficacy appears to be better than that of ordinary acupuncture. When combined with conventional treatment, GV Ac may increase the benefit. But limited by the methodological quality of the included studies, more strictly designed large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020203480.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura , Isquemia Encefálica , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Actividades Cotidianas , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapiaRESUMEN
Background and Aim: Although most chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients achieve effective virological suppression after receiving long-term nucleos(t)ide analogs (Nucs) therapy, the safety of off-therapy is controversial under the monitor. Methods: We identified studies through searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from January 1990 to February 2021. The eligible studies compare the long outcomes between discontinued and continued Nucs treatments groups among CHB patients. This study was conducted to investigate long-term outcomes, including biochemical, serological, and virological outcomes, as well as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development rate between discontinued and maintained Nucs therapy groups among CHB patients. Results: Five eligible studies covering 1,425 patients were selected for meta-analysis. Our result exhibits that patients with Nucs off-treatment have a higher risk of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) flares-up than those who continued Nucs therapy under the monitor (OR = 9.39, 95%CI = 3.87-22.78). Nucs off-therapy patients have a higher virological bound incidence (OR = 617.96, 95%CI = 112.48-3,395.14) and a higher HBV DNA level (OR = 9.39, 95%CI = 3.87-22.78) than those who continued Nucs therapy. There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of hyperbilirubinaemia, hepatic decompensation, and HCC development between both two groups. Patients in Nucs off-therapy group demonstrate a higher HBsAg loss rate than those in the continued group (OR = 7.10, 95%CI = 6.68-13.69). Conclusions: Nucs off-therapy patients may exhibit a higher chance of achieving HBsAg loss than those who continue Nucs therapy. It requires close monitoring after Nucs off-therapy and timely restarting of Nucs therapy when ALT concentrations increase.