Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 74
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Genomics ; 25(1): 708, 2024 Jul 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39033279

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As a nexus of routine antibiotic use and zoonotic pathogen presence, the livestock farming environment is a potential hotspot for the emergence of zoonotic diseases and antibiotic resistant bacteria. Livestock can further facilitate disease transmission by serving as intermediary hosts for pathogens before a spillover event. In light of this, we aimed to characterize the microbiomes and resistomes of dairy workers, whose exposure to the livestock farming environment places them at risk for facilitating community transmission of antibiotic resistant genes and emerging zoonotic diseases. RESULTS: Using shotgun sequencing, we investigated differences in the taxonomy, diversity and gene presence of 10 dairy farm workers and 6 community controls' gut metagenomes, contextualizing these samples with additional publicly available gut metagenomes. We found no significant differences in the prevalence of resistance genes, virulence factors, or taxonomic composition between the two groups. The lack of statistical significance may be attributed, in part, to the limited sample size of our study or the potential similarities in exposures between the dairy workers and community controls. We did, however, observe patterns warranting further investigation including greater abundance of tetracycline resistance genes and prevalence of cephamycin resistance genes as well as lower average gene diversity (even after accounting for differential sequencing depth) in dairy workers' metagenomes. We also found evidence of commensal organism association with tetracycline resistance genes in both groups (including Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Ligilactobacillus animalis, and Simiaoa sunii). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the utility of shotgun metagenomics in examining the microbiomes and resistomes of livestock workers, focusing on a cohort of dairy workers in the United States. While our study revealed no statistically significant differences between groups in taxonomy, diversity and gene presence, we observed patterns in antibiotic resistance gene abundance and prevalence that align with findings from previous studies of livestock workers in China and Europe. Our results lay the groundwork for future research involving larger cohorts of dairy and non-dairy workers to better understand the impact of occupational exposure to livestock farming on the microbiomes and resistomes of workers.


Asunto(s)
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Metagenoma , Humanos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/genética , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Industria Lechera , Metagenómica/métodos , Adulto , Animales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bacterias/genética , Bacterias/clasificación , Agricultores , Masculino , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/genética
3.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 28(12): 2425-2434, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36288573

RESUMEN

SARS-CoV-2 likely emerged from an animal reservoir. However, the frequency of and risk factors for interspecies transmission remain unclear. We conducted a community-based study in Idaho, USA, of pets in households that had >1 confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections in humans. Among 119 dogs and 57 cats, clinical signs consistent with SARS-CoV-2 were reported for 20 dogs (21%) and 19 cats (39%). Of 81 dogs and 32 cats sampled, 40% of dogs and 43% of cats were seropositive, and 5% of dogs and 8% of cats were PCR positive. This discordance might be caused by delays in sampling. Respondents commonly reported close human‒animal contact and willingness to take measures to prevent transmission to their pets. Reported preventive measures showed a slightly protective but nonsignificant trend for both illness and seropositivity in pets. Sharing of beds and bowls had slight harmful effects, reaching statistical significance for sharing bowls and seropositivity.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades de los Gatos , Humanos , Animales , Perros , Gatos , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/veterinaria , Idaho/epidemiología , Washingtón/epidemiología , Composición Familiar , Mascotas , Enfermedades de los Gatos/epidemiología
4.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 34(5): 385-392, 2021 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34310453

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of the review is to summarize recent advances in understanding the origins, drivers and clinical context of zoonotic disease epidemics and pandemics. In addition, we aimed to highlight the role of clinicians in identifying sentinel cases of zoonotic disease outbreaks. RECENT FINDINGS: The majority of emerging infectious disease events over recent decades, including the COVID-19 pandemic, have been caused by zoonotic viruses and bacteria. In particular, coronaviruses, haemorrhagic fever viruses, arboviruses and influenza A viruses have caused significant epidemics globally. There have been recent advances in understanding the origins and drivers of zoonotic epidemics, yet there are gaps in diagnostic capacity and clinical training about zoonoses. SUMMARY: Identifying the origins of zoonotic pathogens, understanding factors influencing disease transmission and improving the diagnostic capacity of clinicians will be crucial to early detection and prevention of further epidemics of zoonoses.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/epidemiología , Pandemias/prevención & control , Zoonosis/epidemiología , Animales , COVID-19/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad
5.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 846, 2021 Aug 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34418974

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A proactive approach to preventing and responding to emerging infectious diseases is critical to global health security. We present a three-stage approach to modeling the spatial distribution of outbreak vulnerability to Aedes aegypti-vectored diseases in Perú. METHODS: Extending a framework developed for modeling hemorrhagic fever vulnerability in Africa, we modeled outbreak vulnerability in three stages: index case potential (stage 1), outbreak receptivity (stage 2), and epidemic potential (stage 3), stratifying scores on season and El Niño events. Subsequently, we evaluated the validity of these scores using dengue surveillance data and spatial models. RESULTS: We found high validity for stage 1 and 2 scores, but not stage 3 scores. Vulnerability was highest in Selva Baja and Costa, and in summer and during El Niño events, with index case potential (stage 1) being high in both regions but outbreak receptivity (stage 2) being generally high in Selva Baja only. CONCLUSIONS: Stage 1 and 2 scores are well-suited to predicting outbreaks of Ae. aegypti-vectored diseases in this setting, however stage 3 scores appear better suited to diseases with direct human-to-human transmission. To prevent outbreaks, measures to detect index cases should be targeted to both Selva Baja and Costa, while Selva Baja should be prioritized for healthcare system strengthening. Successful extension of this framework from hemorrhagic fevers in Africa to an arbovirus in Latin America indicates its broad utility for outbreak and pandemic preparedness and response activities.


Asunto(s)
Aedes , Arbovirus , Dengue , Epidemias , Animales , Dengue/epidemiología , Dengue/prevención & control , Humanos , Insectos Vectores , Mosquitos Vectores
6.
Ear Hear ; 40(3): 680-689, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30157082

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study utilized personal noise measurements and fit-testing to evaluate the association between noise exposures and personal attenuation rating (PAR) values among participating workers, and second, to compare the attenuated exposure levels received by the workers and the British Standards Institute's recommended noise exposure range of 70 to 80 dBA. DESIGN: We measured hearing protection device (HPD) attenuation among a sample of 91 workers at 2 US metal manufacturing facilities, through performance of personal noise dosimetry measurements and HPD fit-testing over multiple work shifts. We compared this testing with participant questionnaires and annual audiometric hearing threshold results. RESULTS: The average 8-hr time-weighted average noise exposures for study participants was 79.8 dBA (SD = 7.0 dBA), and the average PAR from fit-testing was 20.1 dB (±6.7 dB). While differences existed between sites, 84% of the 251 PAR measurements resulted in effective protection levels below the recommended 70 dBA (indicating overprotection), while workers were underprotected (i.e., effective exposures >80 dBA) during <1% of monitored shifts. Our results also demonstrated a significant positive relationship between measured noise exposure and PAR among non-custom-molded plug users (p = 0.04). Non-custom-molded plug wearers also showed a significant increase in PAR by sequential fit-test interaction (p = 0.01), where on average, subsequent fit-testing resulted in increasingly higher HPD attenuation. Workers at site 1 showed higher PARs. PARs were significantly related to race, even when adjusting for site location. While age, hearing threshold level, task, and self-reported tinnitus showed no significant effect on individual PAR in an unadjusted model, site, race, and sand- or water-blasting activities were significant predictors in adjusted models. Within-worker variability in time-weighted averages and PARs across repeated measurements was substantially lower than variability between workers. CONCLUSIONS: Careful selection of HPDs is necessary to minimize instances of overprotection to workers in low and moderate occupational noise environments. The use of fit-testing in hearing conservation programs to evaluate PAR is recommended to avoid overprotection from noise exposure while also minimizing instances of under-attenuation.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos de Protección de los Oídos , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/prevención & control , Industria Manufacturera , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Adulto , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metales , Persona de Mediana Edad
7.
JAMA ; 2024 Oct 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39361312

RESUMEN

This Viewpoint discusses how increasing climate change and other environmental hazards contribute to greater adverse health effects, particularly for socially vulnerable populations, and calls for improved gathering of social and environmental history data and risk assessment in routine patient encounters.

8.
Occup Environ Med ; 75(5): 359-368, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29478007

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Women in veterinary occupations are routinely exposed to potential reproductive hazards, yet research into their birth outcomes is limited. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of the association between maternal veterinary occupation and adverse birth outcomes. METHODS: Using Washington State birth certificate, fetal death certificate and hospital discharge data from 1992 to 2014, we compared birth outcomes of mothers in veterinary professions (n=2662) with those in mothers in dental professions (n=10 653) and other employed mothers (n=8082). Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using log binomial regression. Outcomes studied were premature birth (<37 weeks), small for gestational age (SGA), malformations and fetal death (death at ≥20 weeks gestation). Subgroup analyses evaluated risk of these outcomes among veterinarians and veterinary support staff separately. RESULTS: While no statistically significant associations were found, we noted a trend for SGA births in all veterinary mothers compared with dental mothers (RR=1.16, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.36) and in veterinarians compared with other employed mothers (RR=1.37, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.96). Positive but non-significant association was found for malformations among children of veterinary support staff. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the need for further study of the association between veterinary occupation and adverse birth outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Muerte Fetal/etiología , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Veterinarios , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Anomalías Congénitas/etiología , Odontólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Veterinarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Veterinaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Washingtón/epidemiología
9.
Int J Audiol ; 57(sup1): S3-S11, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29216778

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study characterised overall and specific costs associated with hearing conservation programmes (HCPs) at US metal manufacturing sites, and examined the association between these costs and several noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) outcomes. DESIGN: We interviewed personnel and reviewed records at participating facilities. We also measured noise for comparison to the ten-year average of measurements made by each facility. NIHL outcomes assessed included rates of standard threshold shifts (STS) and high-frequency hearing loss, as well as prevalence of hearing impairment, for each participating facility. We used linear regression to identify per-person HCP costs that best predicted the NIHL outcomes. STUDY SAMPLE: We evaluated 14 US metal manufacturing facilities operated by a single company. RESULTS: Annual HCP costs ranged from roughly $67,000 to $397,000 (average $308 ± 80 per worker). Our full-shift noise measurements (mean 83.1 dBA) showed good agreement with the facilities' measurements (mean 82.6 dBA). Hearing impairment prevalence was about 15% overall. Higher expenditures for training and hearing protector fit-testing were significantly associated with reduced STS prevalence. Higher training expenditures were also related to lower hearing impairment prevalence and high-frequency hearing loss rates. CONCLUSIONS: HCP costs were substantial and variable. Increased workplace spending on training and fit-testing may help minimise NIHL.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/economía , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/prevención & control , Instalaciones Industriales y de Fabricación/economía , Metalurgia/economía , Ruido/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Salud Laboral/economía , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/economía , Audiometría/economía , Percepción Auditiva , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Dispositivos de Protección de los Oídos/economía , Gastos en Salud , Audición , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/epidemiología , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/fisiopatología , Humanos , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Factores Protectores , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
10.
Am J Ind Med ; 60(12): 1031-1038, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28940215

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Community noise exposure has been shown to increase the risk of hypertension; however, the relationship between occupational noise exposure and hypertension is less clear. METHODS: Using an inception cohort of workers in a specialty metals manufacturing company, we retrospectively assessed occupational noise exposure, hearing acuity, and incident hypertension diagnoses using administrative datasets. Time-weighted average noise exposure levels were assigned to employees based on their job histories. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to determine the association of noise exposure with risk of incident hypertension. RESULTS: The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of incident hypertension did not significantly differ between groups by cumulative continuous or categorized noise exposure metric. CONCLUSION: We found no increased risk of incident hypertension with exposure to occupational noise among workers. Further assessment examining workers' use of hearing protection devices is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión/etiología , Metalurgia , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Adulto , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Estados Unidos
11.
BMC Med Educ ; 17(1): 45, 2017 Feb 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28228144

RESUMEN

One Health is an emerging concept that stresses the linkages between human, animal, and environmental health, as well as the need for interdisciplinary communication and collaboration to address health issues including emerging zoonotic diseases, climate change impacts, and the human-animal bond. It promotes complex problem solving using a systems framework that considers interactions between humans, animals, and their shared environment. While many medical educators may not yet be familiar with the concept, the One Health approach has been endorsed by a number of major medical and public health organizations and is beginning to be implemented in a number of medical schools. In the research setting, One Health opens up new avenues to understand, detect, and prevent emerging infectious diseases, and also to conduct translational studies across species. In the clinical setting, One Health provides practical ways to incorporate environmental and animal contact considerations into patient care. This paper reviews clinical and research aspects of the One Health approach through an illustrative case updating the biopsychosocial model and proposes a basic set of One Health competencies for training and education of human health care providers.


Asunto(s)
Salud Ambiental/educación , Salud Global/educación , Personal de Salud/educación , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , Animales , Cambio Climático , Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes , Conducta Cooperativa , Educación Médica , Salud Ambiental/organización & administración , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Salud Pública , Zoonosis
12.
J Nutr ; 146(5): 1118-24, 2016 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27075911

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In resource-limited settings in which child malnutrition is prevalent, humans live in close proximity to household livestock. However, the relation between household livestock and child nutrition represents a considerable knowledge gap. OBJECTIVE: We assessed whether household livestock ownership or livestock disease episodes were associated with growth in young children in western Kenya. METHODS: We incorporated monthly anthropometric measurements for children <5 y of age into an ongoing linked human and animal surveillance cohort in rural western Kenya. Using linear mixed models adjusted for age, sex, and household wealth, we tested whether baseline household livestock ownership was related to baseline child height for age or prospective growth rate. We also evaluated whether livestock disease episodes were associated with child growth rate over 11 mo of follow-up. RESULTS: We collected data on 925 children over the course of follow-up. Greater household livestock ownership at baseline was not related to baseline child height-for-age z score (adjusted ß: 0.01 SD; 95% CI: -0.02, 0.04 SD) or child growth rate (adjusted ß: 0.02 cm/y; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.07 cm/y). Livestock disease episodes were not significantly associated with child growth across the entire cohort (adjusted ß: -0.007 cm/mo; 95% CI: -0.02, 0.006 cm/mo). However, children in households with livestock digestive disease between June and November gained less height than did children in households that did not report livestock disease (ß: -0.063 cm/mo; 95% CI: -0.112, -0.016 cm/mo). Children <2 y of age in households with livestock digestive disease gained less weight than did those who did not report disease (ß: -0.033 kg/mo; 95% CI: -0.063, -0.003 kg/mo). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of young children in western Kenya, we did not find an association between ownership of livestock and child growth status. However, disease episodes in household livestock may be related to a lower child growth rate in some groups.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Animales , Trastornos de la Nutrición del Niño/complicaciones , Composición Familiar , Trastornos del Crecimiento/etiología , Crecimiento , Ganado , Propiedad , Animales , Estatura , Niño , Preescolar , Enfermedades del Sistema Digestivo/veterinaria , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Kenia , Masculino , Estado Nutricional , Estudios Prospectivos , Población Rural , Aumento de Peso
13.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 13(8): 577-87, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26950677

RESUMEN

Zoonotic transmission of influenza A virus (IAV) between swine and workers in swine production facilities may play a role in the emergence of novel influenza strains with pandemic potential. Guidelines to prevent transmission of influenza to swine workers have been developed but there is a need for evidence-based decision-making about protective measures such as respiratory protection. A mathematical model was applied to estimate the risk of occupational IAV exposure to swine workers by contact and airborne transmission, and to evaluate the use of respirators to reduce transmission. The Markov model was used to simulate the transport and exposure of workers to IAV in a swine facility. A dose-response function was used to estimate the risk of infection. This approach is similar to methods previously used to estimate the risk of infection in human health care settings. This study uses concentration of virus in air from field measurements collected during outbreaks of influenza in commercial swine facilities, and analyzed by polymerase chain reaction. It was found that spending 25 min working in a barn during an influenza outbreak in a swine herd could be sufficient to cause zoonotic infection in a worker. However, this risk estimate was sensitive to estimates of viral infectivity to humans. Wearing an excellent fitting N95 respirator reduced this risk, but with high aerosol levels the predicted risk of infection remained high under certain assumptions. The results of this analysis indicate that under the conditions studied, swine workers are at risk of zoonotic influenza infection. The use of an N95 respirator could reduce such risk. These findings have implications for risk assessment and preventive programs targeting swine workers. The exact level of risk remains uncertain, since our model may have overestimated the viability or infectivity of IAV. Additionally, the potential for partial immunity in swine workers associated with repeated low-dose exposures or from previous infection with other influenza strains was not considered. Further studies should explore these uncertainties.


Asunto(s)
Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae/transmisión , Zoonosis/transmisión , Zoonosis/virología , Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Animales , Humanos , Cadenas de Markov , Modelos Teóricos , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae/veterinaria , Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria/virología , Medición de Riesgo , Porcinos/virología , Zoonosis/prevención & control
14.
J Environ Health ; 78(9): 22-6; quiz 45, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27263180

RESUMEN

To assess the behavior and precautions that swine workers take during suspected influenza outbreaks in swine, six commercial swine farms in the Midwest U.S. region were visited when influenza outbreaks were suspected in herds during the fall/winter of 2012-2013. Use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and type of task performed by swine workers were recorded based on farm representative reports. Between one to two workers were working on the day of each visit and spent approximately 25 minutes performing work-related tasks that placed them in close contact with the swine. The most common tasks reported were walking the aisles (27%), handling pigs (21%), and handling equipment (21%). The most common PPE were boots (100%), heavy rubber gloves (75%), and dedicated nondisposable clothing (74%). Use of N95 respirators was reported at three farms. Hand hygiene practices were common in most of the farms, but reportedly performed for only 20% to 25% of tasks.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/epidemiología , Animales , Higiene de las Manos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Virus de la Influenza A/fisiología , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/virología , Minnesota/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae/prevención & control , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae/virología , Equipo de Protección Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/prevención & control , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/virología
15.
Int J Audiol ; 54 Suppl 1: S30-6, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25549168

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative contributions of tinnitus, asymmetrical hearing loss, low frequency hearing loss (pure tone average of 0.5, 1, 2, 3 kHz; PTA.5123), or high frequency hearing loss (pure tone average of 4, 6 kHz; PTA46), to acute injury risk among a cohort of production and maintenance workers at six aluminum manufacturing plants, adjusting for ambient noise exposure and other recognized predictors of injury risk. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. STUDY SAMPLE: The study considered 9920 workers employed during 2003 to 2008. The cohort consisted of 8818 workers (89%) whose complete records were available. RESULTS: Adjusting for noise exposure and other recognized injury predictors, a 25% increased acute injury risk was observed among workers with a history of tinnitus in conjunction with high-frequency hearing loss (PTA46). Low frequency hearing loss may be associated with minor, yet less serious, injury risk. We did not find evidence that asymmetry contributes to injury risk. CONCLUSION: These results provide evidence that tinnitus, combined with high-frequency hearing loss, may pose an important safety threat to workers, especially those who work in high-noise exposed environments. These at risk workers may require careful examination of their communication and hearing protection needs.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva de Alta Frecuencia/complicaciones , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/etiología , Acúfeno/complicaciones , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Dispositivos de Protección de los Oídos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ruido/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
16.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 13(1)2024 Jan 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38275332

RESUMEN

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health problem stemming from the use of antibiotics in humans, animals, and the environment. This study used whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of E. coli to explore patterns of AMR across sectors in Washington State, USA (WA). The WGS data from 1449 E. coli isolates were evaluated for isolation source (humans, animals, food, or the environment) and the presence of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). We performed sequence typing using PubMLST and used ResFinder to identify ARGs. We categorized isolates as being pan-susceptible, resistant, or multidrug-resistant (MDR), defined as carrying resistance genes for at least three or more antimicrobial drug classes. In total, 60% of isolates were pan-susceptible, while 18% were resistant, and 22% exhibited MDR. The proportion of resistant isolates varied significantly according to the source of the isolates (p < 0.001). The greatest resistance was detected in isolates from humans and then animals, while environmental isolates showed the least resistance. This study demonstrates the feasibility of comparing AMR across various sectors in Washington using WGS and a One Health approach. Such analysis can complement other efforts for AMR surveillance and potentially lead to targeted interventions and monitoring activities to reduce the overall burden of AMR.

17.
One Health ; 18: 100676, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39010955

RESUMEN

The One Health conceptual framework envisions human, animal, and environmental health as interconnected. This framework has achieved remarkable progress in the control of zoonotic diseases, but it commonly neglects the environmental domain, implicitly prioritizes human life over the life of other beings, and fails to consider the political, cultural, social, historical, and economic contexts that shape the health of multispecies collectives. We have developed a novel theoretical framework, Relational One Health, which expands the boundaries of One Health, clearly defines the environmental domain, and provides an avenue for engagement with critical theory. We present a systematic literature review of One Health frameworks to demonstrate the novelty of Relational One Health, and to orient it with respect to other critically-engaged frameworks for One Health. Our results indicate that while Relational One Health complements several earlier frameworks, these other frameworks are either not intended for research, or for narrow sets of research questions. We then demonstrate the utility of Relational One Health for One Health research through case studies in Brazil, Israel, and Ethiopia. Empirical research which is grounded in theory can speak collectively, increasing the impact of individual studies and the field as a whole. One Health is uniquely poised to address several wicked challenges facing the 21st century-climate change, pandemics, neglected zoonoses, and biodiversity collapse-and a unifying theoretical tradition is key to generating the evidence needed to meet these challenges.

18.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 19(12)2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24295136

RESUMEN

A One Health approach considers the role of changing environments with regard to infectious and chronic disease risks affecting humans and nonhuman animals. Recent disease emergence events have lent support to a One Health approach. In 2010, the Stone Mountain Working Group on One Health Proof of Concept assembled and evaluated the evidence regarding proof of concept of the One Health approach to disease prediction and control. Aspects examined included the feasibility of integrating human, animal, and environmental health and whether such integration could improve disease prediction and control efforts. They found evidence to support each of these concepts but also identified the need for greater incorporation of environmental and ecosystem factors into disease assessments and interventions. The findings of the Working Group argue for larger controlled studies to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the One Health approach.


Asunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Salud Pública/métodos , Salud Pública/normas , Animales , Salud Ambiental , Humanos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud
19.
Occup Environ Med ; 70(10): 716-21, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23825197

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Current understanding of the dose-response relationship between occupational noise and hearing loss is based on cross-sectional studies prior to the widespread use of hearing protection, and with limited data regarding noise exposures below 85 dBA. We report on the hearing loss experience of a unique cohort of industrial workers, with daily monitoring of noise inside of hearing protection devices. METHODS: At an industrial facility, workers exhibiting accelerated hearing loss were enrolled in a mandatory programme to monitor daily noise exposures inside of hearing protection. We compared these noise measurements (as time-weighted LAVG) to interval rates of high-frequency hearing loss over a 6-year period using a mixed-effects model, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Workers' high-frequency hearing levels at study inception averaged more than 40 dB Hearing threshold level (HTL). Most noise exposures were less than 85 dBA (mean LAVG 76 dBA, IQR 74-80 dBA). We found no statistical relationship between LAvg and high-frequency hearing loss (p=0.53). Using a metric for monthly maximum noise exposure did not improve model fit. CONCLUSIONS: At-ear noise exposures below 85 dBA did not show an association with risk of high-frequency hearing loss among workers with substantial past noise exposure and hearing loss at baseline. Therefore, effective noise control to below 85 dBA may lead to significant reduction in occupational hearing loss risk in such individuals. Further research is needed on the dose-response relationship of noise and hearing loss in individuals with normal hearing and little prior noise exposure.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos de Protección de los Oídos , Oído , Pérdida Auditiva de Alta Frecuencia/etiología , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/etiología , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Femenino , Audición , Humanos , Industrias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ocupaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Trabajo
20.
Int J Audiol ; 52 Suppl 1: S3-8, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23373740

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Despite the use of hearing protection devices (HPDs), noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) remains one of the most prevalent occupational conditions. A new technology allows for daily monitoring of noise exposures under HPDs. We report on an intervention employing the voluntary use of this technology in a worksite setting. DESIGN: Volunteers were fitted with a device allowing them to monitor noise exposure under their hearing protection on a daily basis. The trends in noise exposures for individuals who completed at least six months of the intervention were analysed. STUDY SAMPLE: Recruitment occurred at three manufacturing facilities, with 127 workers enrolling and 66 workers actively using the device during their work shifts. RESULTS: Among volunteers downloading regularly, the percentage of daily exposures in excess of the OSHA action level (85 dBA) decreased from 14% to 8%, while the percentage of daily exposures in excess of 90 dBA decreased from 4% to less than 2%. CONCLUSION: Initial results from this longitudinal study indicate that volunteers find daily noise exposure monitoring to be feasible, and that workers who monitor daily are able to reduce exposures. The results of subject adherence shed light on the challenges and possibilities of worksite interventions for health and safety.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos de Protección de los Oídos/estadística & datos numéricos , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/prevención & control , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Adulto , Monitoreo del Ambiente/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Industrias/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA