Improved Effectiveness of Immediate Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Hypoglycemia-Prone People with Type 1 Diabetes Compared with Hypoglycemia-Focused Psychoeducation Following a Previous Structured Education: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: Stepped-care has been suggested in the management of patients with problematic hypoglycemia and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH), initially with psychoeducational programs based on blood glucose awareness training, progressing to diabetes technology in those with persisting need. We examined the clinical effectiveness of stepped-care starting with HypoAware and adding continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) as needed, versus immediate CGM in type 1 diabetes patients with problematic hypoglycemia despite previous structured education in insulin adjustment. Research Design and Methods: A randomized controlled trial (N = 52, mean age 53, 56% females). The stepped-care group attended HypoAware. If a severe hypoglycemic event (SHE) had occurred or IAH was still present after 6 months, CGM was initiated. The control group started immediate CGM. Primary endpoint was the number of participants with self-reported SHE. Secondary outcomes, evaluated at 6 and 12 months, were glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), the number of participants with IAH time below range (TBR; <54 mg/dL), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Results: At 6 months, the number of patients reporting SHE had decreased significantly more in the CGM group: -39% (P < 0.05). HbA1c decreased more in the CGM group (-0.47 percentage-points, P < 0.05). IAH was restored in 31% of patients in both groups. TBR (<54 mg/dL) was lower in the CGM group (-2.4 percentage-points, P < 0.05). In the stepped-care group, 93% started CGM/intermittently scanned CGM. At 12 months, the number of patients reporting SHE was still higher in the stepped-care group. No differences were found in PROs. Conclusions: Immediate start of CGM is more effective than a hypoglycemia-focused reeducation program in reducing SHE risk and attaining glycemic targets in individuals with problematic hypoglycemia and IAH despite previous education in insulin dose adjustment. Trial registration: Netherlands Trial Register, NL64474.029.18.

Association between hypoglycaemic glucose variability and autonomic function in type1 diabetes with impaired hypoglycaemia awareness.

Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is suggested to underlie hypoglycaemic risk in impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH). We assessed the prevalence of CAN and the association between glucose variability (GV) and cardiovascular autonomic function in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and IAH. This study is a post-hoc-analysis of results obtained with the IN-CONTROL-trial, designed to assess the effects of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycaemia. Forty participants (aged 46.4 ± 11.4 years, diabetes duration 29.1 ± 13.5 years, HbA1c 7.5 ± 0.8%(58.2 ± 8.8 mmol/mol)) underwent 2-week blinded CGM measurements to obtain GV indices. Standardized cardiovascular reflex tests were used to determine the presence of CAN. Cardiovascular autonomic function was assessed with heart rate variability (HRV) measures. 14(35%) participants were classified as having CAN. Participants with CAN had lower percentage time spent in hypoglycaemic range and low blood glucose index(LBGI). After correction for confounders, a significant positive association was found between the coefficient of variation (CV) or time spent in hypoglycaemic range and HRV measures SDRR or RMSSD, and between LBGI and RMSSD. In patients with T1DM and IAH, hypoglycaemic parameters were associated with better cardiovascular autonomic function and lower prevalence of CAN. This suggests that autonomic neuropathy does not seem to further deteriorate hypoglycaemic risk in patients with IAH.

Glucose variability and mood in adults with diabetes: A systematic review.

Aims: To systematically review the literature regarding the association between glucose variability (GV) and mood in adults with diabetes, appraise the used methods and make suggestions for future research. Methods: A systematic review of literature published up to May 2019 was performed. Abstracts and full texts were screened independently in duplicate. Experimental and observational studies reporting the association between GV and mood in adults with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes were evaluated. A descriptive analysis of the extracted data was conducted, along with a quality assessment. Results: Out of the 2.316 studies screened, eight studies met our criteria. Studies used a variety of measures and metrics to determine GV and mood. Four studies used continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). An association between GV and mood was found in four studies when correlating either postprandial glucose rate of increase with current mood or multiday GV with mood measured retrospectively. The other four studies did not find any association. Conclusions: There is no clear empirical support for a link between GV and mood in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. More rigorous research is warranted using CGM and ecological momentary assessment of mood to assess if and under what conditions an association between GV and mood exists.