Pharmaco-invasive Therapy with Fibrinolytic Agents: A Potent Lifesaving Reperfusion Strategy in STEMI Patients in Metro/Tier-I Cities in India.

Background: Primary Sjogren's Syndrome (pSS) with Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis(HPP) whether an association or a different clinical subset needs review. Aim: To generate a consensus on the importance of pharmaco-invasive therapy for STEMI patients when primary PCI cannot be expeditiously performed in metro and tier-I cities in India. Methodology: A total of 8 expert panel groups comprising 48 experts from Cardiology specialty in India were convened. These groups individually reviewed the evidence on various types of fibrinolytic agents, their importance in STEMI management in general and in India and finally shared their experience and views on the importance of pharmaco-invasive therapy during STEMI management in metro and tier-I cities in India. Individual group opinions were compiled into one document and the consensus was finalized after it was approved by all panel members. Results: The board concluded that in metro and tier-I cities, pharmaco-invasive therapy, preferably using third generation fibrinolytic agents such as Reteplase and Tenecteplase, should be instituted to all patients for whom a delay in primary PCI of greater than 120 minutes from the time of ECG confirmation is anticipated. This will enhance the time window to preserve the myocardium from further damage arising due to patient related, transportation related or in- hospital delays. The present article also highlights the importance of third generation fibrinolytics in pharmaco-invasive therapy and looks at strategies to augment their use. Conclusion: Pharmaco-invasive therapy is recommended in STEMI patients even in metro and tier-I cities of India, where delay in access to PCI is anticipated, in place of a strategy of promoting only primary PCI.

Anticoagulation Management in Patients with Valve Replacement.

Background: Prosthetic valve implantation requires postoperative prophylactic anticoagulation to preclude thrombotic events. The aim of this review is to assess the role of anticoagulation therapy in the management of valve replacement patients. Methodology: Literature from PubMed, Embase, Medline and Google Scholar were searched using the terms "valvular heart disease", "anticoagulant", "mechanical heart valve", "bioprosthesis", "bridging", "Vitamin K antagonist (VKA)", and "acenocoumarol". A committee comprising leading cardiothoracic surgeons from India was convened to review the literature and suggest key practice points. Results: Prosthetic valve implantation requires postoperative prophylactic anticoagulation to preclude thrombotic events. A paramount risk of thromboembolic events is observed during the first three months after surgery for both mechanical and bioprosthetic devices. The VKA therapy with individualized target international normalized ratio (INR) is recommended in patients after prosthetic valve replacement. Therapies for the management of prosthetic valve complications should be based on the type of complications. Special care is mandated in distinguished individuals and those with various co-morbidities. Conclusion: In patients with prosthetic valve replacement, anticoagulant therapy with VKA seems to be an effective option. The role for non-VKA oral anticoagulants in the setting of prosthetic valve replacement has yet to be established. Furthermore, whether the novel oral anticoagulants are safe and efficacious in patients after placement of a bioprosthetic valve remains unanswered.

Non-HDL-cholesterol in dyslipidemia: Review of the state-of-the-art literature and outlook.

Dyslipidemia refers to unhealthy changes in blood lipid composition and is a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). Usually, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) is the primary goal for dyslipidemia management. However, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) has gained attention as an alternative, reliable goal. It encompasses all plasma lipoproteins like LDL, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL), TRL-remnants, and lipoprotein a [Lp(a)] except high-density lipoproteins (HDL). In addition to LDL-C, several other constituents of non-HDL-C have been reported to be atherogenic, aiding the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. They are acknowledged as contributors to residual ASCVD risk that exists in patients on statin therapy with controlled LDL-C levels. Therefore, non-HDL-C is now considered an independent risk factor or predictor for CVD. The popularity of non-HDL-C is attributed to its ease of estimation and non-dependency on fasting status. It is also better at predicting ASCVD risk in patients on statin therapy, and/or in those with obesity, diabetes, and metabolic disorders. In addition, large follow-up studies have reported that individuals with higher baseline non-HDL-C at a younger age (<45 years) were more prone to adverse CVD events at an older age, suggesting a predictive ability of non-HDL-C over the long term. Consequently, non-HDL-C is recommended as a secondary goal for dyslipidemia management by most international guidelines. Intriguingly, geographical patterns in recent epidemiological studies showed remarkably high non-HDL-C attributable mortality in high-risk countries. This review highlights the independent role of non-HDL-C in ASCVD pathogenesis and prognosis. In addition, the need for a country-specific approach to dyslipidemia management at the community/population level is discussed. Overall, non-HDL-C can become a co-primary or primary goal in dyslipidemia management.