Tuberculosis after liver transplantation in a large center in New York City: QuantiFERON® -TB Gold-based pre-transplant screening performance and active tuberculosis post-transplant.

INTRODUCTION: Pre-transplant screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is a complex consideration that varies by institution. Inconsistent performance of interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) further complicates screening. Data regarding LTBI screening outcomes and test characteristics in a large, foreign-born pre-transplant population within the United States are limited. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients who received QuantiFERON® -TB Gold (QFT) prior to liver transplantation (LT) were included. Characteristics of patients were compared by QFT result, and predictors of indeterminate results were evaluated. Similar comparisons were performed between patients who developed active TB and those who did not. RESULTS: Of 148 patients screened, the rate of positive, indeterminate, and negative testing was 13.5% (20/148), 27% (40/148), and 59% (88/148), respectively. An indeterminate QFT result was more than 16 times more likely in patients with a Model for End-stage Liver Disease score >25 (odds ratio [OR] 16.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-132.0; P = .008) and more than 4 times when performed in our institution's lab compared with commercial lab (OR 4.1; 95% CI, 1.34-12.44; P = .013). The overall TB incidence was 1102/100 000 transplant cases. No patient who developed active TB had a positive QFT. All were born outside of the United States (P = .06) and had pre-transplantation chest imaging demonstrating granulomatous disease (P = .006). CONCLUSION: Our experience further highlights the challenges of LTBI screening prior to LT and suggests that QFT may be a poor predictor of active TB in higher risk pre-transplant populations. Candidates should be screened as early as possible to optimize QFT performance, and local epidemiological data should be used to create institution-specific screening protocols in areas with large populations from TB-endemic regions. Management should consider TB risk factors, QFT, and imaging instead of reliance on QFT testing alone.

Clinical characteristics, etiological profile, treatment and long term outcomes in patients with non ischemic systolic heart failure; Himachal Pradesh heart failure registry (HP-HF registry).

BACKGROUND: The data on clinical characteristics, treatment practices and out comes in patients with Non- ischemic Systolic Heart Failure (NISHF) is limited. We report clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes in patients with NISHF. METHODS: 1004 patients with NISHF were prospectively enrolled and their demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment were recorded systematically. Patients were followed annually for a median of 3 years (1 year to 8 years) for allcause death, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE); composite of all-cause death, hospitalization of heart failure, and or for stroke. RESULTS: Patients of NISHF were middle-aged (58.8±16.2 years) population with severely depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (29.3±7.02%) and 31.1% had symptoms of advanced Heart failure. Hypertension (43.6%), obesity and or overweight (28.0%), Diabetes (15.0%), and valvular heart disease (11.8%) were the common risk factors. The guideline directed medical treatment was prescribed in more than 80% of the study cohort. Incidence of all cause death and MACE was 7 (6.8, 8.8) per 100 person years and 11(10, 13) per 100 person years respectively. The cumulative incidence of deaths and MACE was 35% (30%, 40%) and 49% (44%, 53%) at 8 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients of NISHF were middle-aged population with severely depressed LV systolic function with significant incident morbidity and mortality. Early detection of risk factors and their risk management and enhancing the use of guideline directed treatment may improve the outcomes.

Hepatitis C and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Kidney Transplantation: The Mount Sinai Experience.

Mount Sinai Hospital in New York has a long history in the field of organ transplantation. The first kidney transplant at Mount Sinai was performed in 1967 by the late Dr. Lewis Burrows and the first laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in New York was performed at Mount Sinai in 1996. Over 3000 kidney transplantations have been performed at Mount Sinai. In the early 1990s, the first hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive patient at Mount Sinai underwent a kidney transplant and the first kidney transplant in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in New York was performed at Mount Sinai in 2001. In general, these patients have done well after renal transplantation, with outcomes similar to those seen in non-infected patients. This chapter will describe the evolution of immunosuppressive regimens in HCV positive and HIV positive patients, and will describe the outcomes of kidney transplantation in these patients. Given the favorable outcomes, it is reasonable to continue to offer renal transplantation as a treatment for end stage renal disease patients with HCV and/or HIV.