Adenosine and adenosine receptors in the immunopathogenesis and treatment of cancer.

Tumor cells overcome anti-tumor responses in part through immunosuppressive mechanisms. There are several immune modulatory mechanisms. Among them, adenosine is an important factor which is generated by both cancer and immune cells in tumor microenvironment to suppress anti-tumor responses. Two cell surface expressed molecules including CD73 and CD39 catalyze the generation of adenosine from adenosine triphosphate (ATP). The generation of adenosine can be enhanced under metabolic stress like tumor hypoxic conditions. Adenosine exerts its immune regulatory functions through four different adenosine receptors (ARs) including A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 which are expressed on various immune cells. Several studies have indicated the overexpression of adenosine generating enzymes and ARs in various cancers which was correlated with tumor progression. Since the signaling of ARs enhances tumor progression, their manipulation can be promising therapeutic approach in cancer therapy. Accordingly, several agonists and antagonists against ARs have been designed for cancer therapy. In this review, we will try to clarify the role of different ARs in the immunopathogenesis, as well as their role in the treatment of cancer.

CD73 as a potential opportunity for cancer immunotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer cells apply various mechanisms to induce and enhance immune escape. The complex network of immune-response modulating factors in the tumor microenvironment is a reason for the difficulties encountered when attempting to treat many cancers. Adenosine is a potent immune-modulating factor that can be generated through the degradation of ATP by cooperative action of NTPDase1 (CD39) and ecto-5'-nucleotidase (CD73) molecules. Overexpression of CD73 on tumor and immune cells leads to the presence of a high concentration of this factor in the tumor region. Upregulation of CD73 is associated with the overproduction of adenosine; it suppresses antitumor immune responses and helps proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Areas covered: We attempt to clarify the immunobiology of CD73 in association with its role in cancer development, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Moreover, we have reviewed CD73-targeting studies and highlighted CD73 as a potent target for cancer immunotherapy. Expert opinion: It seems that blockade of CD73, in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4, can be a novel promising therapeutic strategy that can be evaluated in the future trials.

Characterization of Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Recognizing Prostate Specific Antigen: Implication for Design of a Sandwich ELISA.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men. Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) is a tumor-associated glycoprotein with enzymatic activity which is secreted by the prostate gland. Following entry to the blood, 70-90% of PSA forms complexes with protease inhibitors and its enzymatic activity is inhibited. The serum level of PSA is increased and the rate of free PSA (fPSA) to total PSA is decreased in prostate cancer patients. Therefore, measurement of PSA and fPSA in serum is very valuable for diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. METHODS: In the present study, five anti PSA monoclonal Antibodies (mAb) were characterized by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and immunoblotting. For designing a sandwich ELISA, epitope specificity of these antibodies was studied by a competition ELISA. Free PSA was purified by electroelution technique from seminal plasma and used to produce polyclonal anti-fPSA antibody in rabbit. Purified polyclonal antibody (pAb) and mAbs were conjugated with HRP enzyme and Biotin (Bio) to set up the sandwich ELISA. RESULTS: Three of the mAbs were found to recognize PSA similarly. One of these mAbs (2G3) was paired with anti-fPSA pAb to detect fPSA in serum. Eventually, serum fPSA concentration of 356 subjects was measured and compared by our designed ELISA and a commercial ELISA kit. Our results demonstrated a significant correlation (r=0.68; p<0.001) between the two assays. Sensitivity and specificity of our designed ELISA was 72.4 and 82.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: These results imply suitability of our designed ELISA for detection of fPSA in patients with prostate cancer.