A Snapshot of Oklahoma's CHR/CHW Workforce: Results from the Region 6 Training Needs Assessment Survey, 2019.

Background ­: The Region 6 South Central Public Health Training Center conducts needs assessments to inform the development of online trainings tailored to the HRSA Region 6 health and public health workforce. The purpose of this study was to assess Oklahoma's Community Health Representative (CHR) / Community Health Worker (CHW) workforce characteristics, current trainings, and training needs to guide the development of online trainings. Methods ­: This survey-based needs assessment for health and public health workforce training needs asked about alternative job titles, top three health issues addressed, roles played, skills used, current trainings, and training needs. Descriptive statistical analysis provided insights about CHRs/CHWs. The Fisher's exact test was used to compare frequency of responses between CHRs and CHWs, with p-values <0.05 considered significant. We analyzed qualitative data by using a modified content analysis. Results ­: Fifty-one self-identified CHRs/CHWs in Oklahoma participated in the 2019 regional health and public health training needs assessment. Most CHRs/CHWs were female and identified as "frontline public health workers." Respondents reported a range of educational attainment and diverse job titles. CHRs worked at tribal health or public health organizations primarily in rural areas. Most CHWs worked in urban areas and were employed by state and local health departments or community-based organizations. CHRs/CHWs had a broad spectrum of roles and skills, with required trainings reflecting various organizational needs. CHRs/CHWs expressed strong interest in receiving additional trainings via multiple delivery formats. Discussion and Conclusions ­: Oklahoma's CHRs/CHWs would benefit from and utilize workforce development, including trainings on a broad spectrum of roles and skills in multiple delivery formats. Potential employers and funders across the state would benefit from education on CHRs/CHWs as a workforce, team-integration, and sustainable funding.

Oklahoma's fetal and infant mortality review projects.

In Oklahoma, the infant mortality rate is higher than the national rate. Fetal Infant Mortality Review (FIMR) is an effective perinatal systems intervention. FIMR gathers information from medical, social, and community sources taking a comprehensive look at how well these systems are serving women and infants. It is important to understand that FIMR is a method to develop community-based plans to reduce fetal and infant mortality. It is not a quick-fix solution to a complex problem, a research study, an institutional review, or a system for assigning blame or responsibility for a death. FIMR has been instrumental in identifying what health care providers, community leaders, and citizens can do to improve the health and lives of babies in Oklahoma. Key steps include: (1.) Data abstraction (2.) A home interview (3.) A review of individual case summaries (4.) Development of community-based solutions and interventions designed to improve service systems and resources

It's all about kids: preventing overweight in elementary school children in Tulsa, OK.

In response to the increased incidence of child overweight, a school-based program, It's All About Kids, was designed by the Tulsa Health Department, Tulsa Public Schools, and community partners to improve food choices and increase physical activity of students in first through fifth grade. The nutrition component consisted of six weekly 30-minute experiential, age-appropriate classroom lessons, including healthful-eating food games, taste-testing foods, whole-grain bread baking, information on portion sizes, and food demonstrations. Documenting and evaluating school-based intervention programs is critical for setting evidence-based health policy, justifying funding, and achieving broader implementation of successful interventions. To evaluate the effectiveness of the It's All About Kids nutrition component in fourth-grade children, we conducted a controlled trial from 20 fourth-grade classes in five intervention and five comparison Title I public schools. Evaluation included 140 fourth-grade students, including 69 in the comparison group and 71 in the intervention group. Outcomes were measured by pre-, post-, and follow-up tests using a modified version of the Pathways Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors questionnaire and the Child and Adolescent Trial of Cardiovascular Health (CATCH) Food Checklist. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance over time controlling for sex, paired samples t tests, and independent samples t tests. Intervention students had significant improvements in knowledge of which food had more fat (P<0.043). Intervention students' behavioral intent scale scores for food choice intentions improved significantly (P<0.014). Self-reported consumption of saturated fat and sodium improved considerably in both intervention and comparison students. We conclude that results support a broader program implementation. More reinforcement over time may be needed to sustain the level of improvement.