Technical performance of colonoscopy -- multicenter study in university and non-university centers of Romania.

UNLABELLED: The aim of the paper was to evaluate the national availability of colonoscopy and the quality parameters of this procedure in our country. MATERIAL AND METHOD: During a 6 months period (01.07- 31.12.2009), we performed a prospective multicenter study in which 76 centers were invited to respond to a questionnaire regarding colonoscopy, 39 centers agreeing to participate. We assessed: the number of colonoscopies, the number of total colonoscopies and the causes of incomplete colonoscopies. RESULTS: During the study period, 16,083 colonoscopies were performed, 12,294 (76.4%) of them total colonoscopies. In 1,191 cases, stenosis was the cause of incomplete colonoscopy. If we consider this an objective reason for an incomplete colonoscopy, there were 12,294 total colonoscopies (82.4%). Comparing university centers with non-university ones, the proportion of total colonoscopies was 10,400/12,475 (83.4%) vs. 1,894/2,417 (78.4%) (p less then 0.0001). However, comparing the present study with previous ones, performed in 2003 and 2007, the proportion of total colonoscopies increased from 70.5% to 76.9% and 82.4% respectively (2003 vs. 2007 p less then 0.0001; 2007 vs. 2009 p less then 0.0001), while the quality difference between university and non-university hospitals persisted. CONCLUSIONS: the quality of colonoscopy in Romania increased in the last 5 years, while the quality difference between university and non-university hospitals persisted.

Polyp and endoscopist-related factors influencing complication rates in difficult colonic polypectomies: results of a multicenter observational study.

BACKGROUND: Current polypectomy practices are highly variable. Endoscopists report increased size, nonpolypoid lesion type and unfavorable position as characteristic of difficult polypectomies. We studied reported difficult colonic polypectomies to determine polyp-related and operator-dependent factors influencing complication rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted an international multicenter observational prospective study of difficult colonic polypectomies. Endoscopists reported difficult cases of colonic polypectomies, techniques and complication rates. Per-polyp and per-endoscopist analyses were performed. RESULTS: Ninety procedures were reported at 4 participating centers by 19 endoscopists. 43% of the lesions were pedunculated, 39% were sessile and 18% were flat. Lesion size ranged between 5-60 mm. Bleeding occurred in 18 out of 90 procedures (17 immediate, 1 delayed); no perforations were reported. Bleeding rate was independent of patient age or sex, polyp type, size and histology or resection method. Procedures were deemed difficult due to polyp size (37/90), unfavorable position (23/90), bleeding risk (12/90), lesion type (12/90) or other reasons (6/90) with no statistically significant difference between expert and beginner endoscopists (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Difficult colonic polypectomies are unpredictable with a complication rate independent of polyp type or size. There was no difference between experts and beginners with regard to technical aspects of resection or complication rates.