Staying Virtual: A Survey Study of the Virtual Lecture Experience in Academic Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Increasing clinical demands can adversely impact academic advancement, including the ability to deliver lectures and disseminate scholarly work. The virtual lecture platform became mainstream during the height of the coronavirus-19 pandemic. Lessons learned from this period may offer insight into supporting academic productivity among physicians who must balance multiple demands, including high clinical workloads and family care responsibilities. We evaluated perceptions on delivering virtual lectures to determine whether virtual venues merit continuation beyond the pandemic's initial phase and whether these perceptions differ by gender and rank. METHODS: In a survey study, faculty who spoke in 1 of 3 virtual lecture programs in the Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Otolaryngology, and Radiology at a university hospital in 2020 to 2022 were queried about their experience. Speakers' motivations to lecture virtually and the perceived advantages and disadvantages of virtual and in-person lectures were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative analyses. RESULTS: Seventy-two of 95 (76%) faculty members responded (40% women, 38% men, and 22% gender undisclosed). Virtual lectures supported the speakers "a lot" to "extremely" with the following goals: enhancing one's reputation and credibility (76%), networking (70%), receiving feedback (63%), and advancing prospects for promotion (59%). Virtual programs also increased the speakers' sense of accomplishment (70%) and professional optimism (61%) by at least "a lot," including instructors and assistant professors who previously had difficulty obtaining invitations to speak outside their institution. Many respondents had declined prior invitations to speak in-person due to clinical workload (66%) and family care responsibilities (58%). Previous opportunities to lecture in-person were also refused due to finances (39%), teaching (26%), and research (19%) requirements, personal medical conditions or disabilities (9%), and religious obligations (5%). Promotion was a stronger motivating factor to lecture virtually for instructors and assistant professors than for associate and full professors. By contrast, disseminating work and ideas was a stronger motivator for associate and full professors. Associate and full professors also reported greater improvement in work-related well-being than earlier career faculty from the virtual lecture experience. Very few differences were found by gender. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual lecture programs support faculty who might not otherwise have the opportunity to lecture in-person due to multiple constraints. To increase the dissemination of scholarly work and expand opportunities to all faculty, virtual lectures should continue even as in-person venues are reestablished.

Concept of the Ambulatory Pain Physician.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Given the growing number of ambulatory surgeries being performed and the variability in postoperative pain requirements, early discharge, and inconsistent follow-up, ambulatory surgery presents a unique challenge for this patient population and warrants the presence of an ambulatory pain specialist to evaluate a patient preoperatively and postoperatively to optimize patient safety and satisfaction. This article explores the crucial role that a dedicated pain physician would have in the ambulatory surgery setting. RECENT FINDINGS: The prevalence of chronic pain, opioid use, and substance abuse is growing in this country, while ambulatory and same-day surgery have also experienced considerable growth. Inevitably, more patients with challenging chronic pain or substance abuse are having ambulatory surgery. Increased BMI, advanced age, more comorbidities warranting a higher ASA physical status classification, and longer surgeries are now all components of ambulatory surgery that contribute to increased risk too. Certain surgeries including breast surgery, inguinal hernia repair, and thoracotomy are at higher risk for the conversion of acute to chronic pain, and an ambulatory pain specialist would be beneficial for added focus on these patients. Multimodal pain control with non-opioids and regional anesthesia adjuvants are beneficial, while emphasis on a patient's functional capacity may be more useful than quantifying the severity of pain. Despite the best efforts of patients' primary care providers or surgeons, patients often are discharged with more chronic opioid therapy than they presented with, and an ambulatory pain specialist can help manage the complications and prevent further escalation of this opioid epidemic. An onsite anesthesiologist with interest in pain management in each ambulatory surgery center administering anesthesia and available onsite to deal with immediate preoperative, intraoperative, and recovery room would be ideal to curb and manage complication from uncontrolled pain and related pain issues.

Suppression of atherogenesis by delivery of TGFbeta1ACT using adeno-associated virus type 2 in LDLR knockout mice.

TGFbeta(1) deficiency has been attributed to the development of atherosclerosis. There is, however, little direct evidence for this concept. To examine this hypothesis, low-density lipoprotein receptor knockout (LDLR(-/-)) mice were injected via tail vein with recombinant adeno-associated virus type 2 (rAAV) carrying a bioactive TGFbeta(1) mutant (AAV/TGFbeta1ACT, n=10) or granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (AAV/GM-CSF, n=10, a negative control) or saline (n=9, control), and then put on a high cholesterol diet. At 18 weeks, blood lipids were found to be similarly elevated in all LDLR(-/-) mice. TGFbeta1ACT and GM-CSF (DNA, mRNA, and protein) were highly expressed in the tissues of mice given TGFbeta1ACT or AAV/GM-CSF, respectively, showing sustained transfection following gene delivery by the systemic route. Saline-treated and AAV/GM-CSF-treated LDLR(-/-) mice showed extensive areas of atherosclerotic lesion formation. There was evidence of intense oxidative stress (nitrotyrosine staining), inflammation (CD68 staining), and expression of adhesion molecules and the ox-LDL receptor LOX-1 (gene array analysis) in the atherosclerotic tissues. Importantly, atherosclerotic lesion formation was markedly inhibited in the LDLR(-/-) mice given AAV/TGFbeta1ACT. Expression of adhesion molecules and LOX-1, oxidative stress, and inflammatory response all were inhibited in the mice given AAV/TGFbeta1ACT (P<0.05 vs. saline-treated or GM-CSF-treated LDLR(-/-) mice). These data for the first time demonstrate that systemic delivery of TGFbeta1ACT gene via AAV can inhibit formation of atherosclerotic lesions, possibly via anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant mechanisms. These findings suggest a novel view of TGFbeta(1) in atherogenesis and a potential new gene therapy for treatment of atherosclerosis.