Utilization of palliative care resource remains low, consuming potentially avoidable hospital admissions in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: a community-based retrospective review.

PURPOSE: Early referral of patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to outpatient palliative care has been shown to increase survival and reduce unnecessary healthcare resource utilization. We aimed to determine outpatient palliative care referral rate and subsequent resource utilization in patients with stage IV NSCLC in a multistate, community-based hospital network and identify rates and reasons for admissions within a local healthcare system of Washington State. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of a multistate hospital network and a local healthcare system. Patients were identified using ICD billing codes. In the multistate network, 2844 patients diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC between January 1, 2013, and March 1, 2018, were reviewed. In the state healthcare system, 283 patients between August 2014 and June 2017 were reviewed. RESULTS: Referral for outpatient palliative care was low: 8% (217/2844) in the multistate network and 11% (32/283) in the local healthcare system. Early outpatient palliative care (6%, 10/156) was associated with a lower proportion of patients admitted into the intensive care unit in the last 30 days of life compared to no outpatient palliative care (15%, 399/2627; p = 0.003). Outpatient palliative care referral was associated with improved overall survival in Kaplan Meier survival analysis. Within the local system, 51% (104/204) of admissions could have been managed in outpatient setting, and of the patients admitted in the last 30 days of life, 59% (87/147) experienced in-hospital deaths. CONCLUSION: We identified underutilization of outpatient palliative care services within stage IV NSCLC patients. Many patients with NSCLC experience hospitalization the last month of life and in-hospital death.

Comparing Initial Surgery versus Fibrinolytics for Pleural Space Infections: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

Rationale: When drainage of complicated pleural space infections alone fails, there exists two strategies in surgery and dual agent-intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy; however, studies comparing these two management strategies are limited. Objectives: To determine the outcomes of surgery versus fibrinolytic therapy as the primary management for complicated pleural space infections (CPSI). Methods: A retrospective review of adults with a CPSI managed with surgery or fibrinolytics between 1/2015 and 3/2018 within a multicenter, multistate hospital system was performed. Fibrinolytics was defined as any dose of dual-agent fibrinolytic therapy and standard fibrinolytics as 5-6 doses twice daily. Treatment failure was defined as persistent infection with a pleural collection requiring intervention. Crossover was defined by any fibrinolytics after surgery or surgery after fibrinolytics. Logistic regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were employed to account for selection bias effect of management strategies in treatment failure and crossover. Results: We identified 566 patients. Surgery was the initial strategy in 55% (311/566). The surgery group had less additional treatments (surgery: 10% [32/311] versus fibrinolytics: 39% [100/255], P < 0.001), treatment failures (surgery: 7% [22/311] versus fibrinolytics: 29% [74/255], P < 0.001), and crossovers (surgery: 6% [20/311] versus fibrinolytics: 19% [49/255], P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis with IPTW demonstrated a lower odds of treatment failure with surgery compared with any fibrinolytics (odds ratio [OR], 0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.30; P < 0.001); and compared with standard fibrinolytics (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.11-0.35; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Although there is a lack of consensus as to the optimal management strategy for patients with a CPSI, in surgical candidates, operative management may offer more benefits and could be considered early in the management course. However, our study is retrospective and nonrandomized; thus, prospective trials are needed to explore this further.

Not Following the Rules in Guideline Care for Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Staging Has Negative Impact.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have identified poor adherence to recommended guidelines in diagnosing and staging patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and this practice has been associated with numerous negative downstream effects. However, these reports consist predominantly of large administrative databases with inherent limitations. We aimed to describe guideline-inconsistent care and identify any associated factors within the Swedish Cancer Institute health care system. METHODS: A review of patients with a diagnosis of primary NSCLC between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014 within our community hospital network was performed. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with guideline-inconsistent care. RESULTS: Guideline-inconsistent care was identified in 24% (98 of 406) of patients: 58% (46 of 81) in clinical stage III and 29% (52 of 179) in stage IV. Of the 46 clinical stage III patients with guideline-inconsistent care, 43% (20) had no invasive mediastinal lymph node sampling before treatment initiation. Patients with guideline-inconsistent care more frequently underwent additional invasive procedures and had a delay in management. Regression analyses identified clinical stage III disease, stage IV with distant metastases, and specialty ordering the diagnostic test to be associated with guideline-inconsistent care. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline-inconsistent diagnosis and staging of patients with NSCLC, particularly patients with stage III disease, are highly prevalent. This finding is associated with incomplete staging, a higher number of additional procedures, and a delay in management. The identification of this vulnerable population may serve as a target for quality improvement interventions aimed to increase adherence to guidelines while decreasing unnecessary procedures and time to treatment.