Securing the future of research computing in the biosciences.

Improvements in technology often drive scientific discovery. Therefore, research requires sustained investment in the latest equipment and training for the researchers who are going to use it. Prioritising and administering infrastructure investment is challenging because future needs are difficult to predict. In the past, highly computationally demanding research was associated primarily with particle physics and astronomy experiments. However, as biology becomes more quantitative and bioscientists generate more and more data, their computational requirements may ultimately exceed those of physical scientists. Computation has always been central to bioinformatics, but now imaging experiments have rapidly growing data processing and storage requirements. There is also an urgent need for new modelling and simulation tools to provide insight and understanding of these biophysical experiments. Bioscience communities must work together to provide the software and skills training needed in their areas. Research-active institutions need to recognise that computation is now vital in many more areas of discovery and create an environment where it can be embraced. The public must also become aware of both the power and limitations of computing, particularly with respect to their health and personal data.

Influence of spermine on DNA conformation in a molecular dynamics trajectory of d(CGCGAATTCGCG)(2): major groove binding by one spermine molecule delays the A-->B transition.

The effect of spermine on the A-DNA to B-DNA transition in d(CGCGAATTCGCG)(2) has been investigated by five A-start molecular dynamics simulations, using the Cornell et al. potential. In the absence of spermine an A-->B transition is initiated immediately and the DNA becomes equidistant from the A- and B-forms at 200ps. In three DNA-spermine simulations, when a spermine is located across the major groove of A-DNA in one of three different initial locations, the time taken to reach equidistance from the A- and B-forms is delayed until 800, 950 or 1000ps. In each case the A-form appears to be temporarily stabilized by spermine's electrostatic interactions with phosphates on both sides of the major groove. The onset of the A-->B transition can be correlated with the spermine losing contact with phosphates on one side of the groove and with A-like --> B-like sugar pucker transitions in the vicinity of the spermine bridge. However in the fifth trajectory, in which the spermine initially threads from the major groove via the backbone into the minor groove, the B-->A transition occurs rapidly once again and the DNA is equidistant between the A- and B-forms within 300ps. This indicates that the mere presence of spermine is insufficient to delay the transition and that major groove binding stabilizes A-DNA.