Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 27(8): 1101-1106, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37459650

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: People experiencing homelessness may use emergency medical services to access health care. We sought to examine the relationship between homelessness and prehospital evaluation and treatment of chest pain. METHODS: We obtained 2019 data of all emergency medical services activations from a single 9-1-1 provider in San Francisco, California with a clinician's primary impression of chest pain. Using chart review, we categorized patients as experiencing homelessness or not and determined treatment rates between the two groups based on local chest pain/acute coronary syndrome protocol. We then stratified the two groups based on primary impression subcategories: "chest pain-not cardiac" and "chest-pain-cardiac/STEMI"; ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). RESULTS: A total of 601 chest pain calls were analyzed after excluding non-transports and pediatric patients. 120 incidents (20%) involved patients experiencing homelessness. Across all chest pain impressions, people experiencing homelessness were less likely to receive aspirin (35% vs 53%; p < 0.001), intravenous access (38% vs 62%; p < 0.001), and nitroglycerin (21% vs 39%; p < 0.001). No patients experiencing homelessness received analgesic medication, though only 4% of other patients received this intervention (0% vs 4%; p = 0.020). People experiencing homelessness were more likely to receive a clinical impression of "chest pain-not cardiac" compared to "chest pain-cardiac/STEMI" (68% vs 32%; p < 0.001). Results were less significant in most fields when adjusted for impression sub categorizations: "chest pain-not cardiac" versus "chest pain-cardiac/STEMI." Greater than 97% of all patients received 12 lead electrocardiograms. CONCLUSIONS: Significant disparities were observed between patients experiencing and not experiencing homelessness in the prehospital treatment of chest pain. Larger scale evaluations are needed to further assess potential disparities in care for people experiencing homelessness in the prehospital setting. Using prehospital clinician impression as a proxy for acuity may mask existing bias and disparity; however, 12-lead ECG acquisition, the key diagnostic tool, was appropriately performed in more than 97% of all chest pain patients.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Personas con Mala Vivienda , Infarto del Miocardio , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Humanos , Niño , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Dolor en el Pecho/terapia , Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico , Electrocardiografía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA