Anatomic versus non-anatomic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma-A European multicentre cohort study in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in the western world over the past decades. As liver resection (LR) represents one of the most efficient treatment options, advantages of anatomic (ALR) versus non-anatomic liver resection (NALR) show a lack of consistent evidence. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate complications and survival rates after both resection types. METHODS: This is a multicentre cohort study using retrospectively and prospectively collected data. We included all patients undergoing LR for HCC between 2009 and 2020 from three specialised centres in Switzerland and Germany. Complication and survival rates after ALR versus NALR were analysed using uni- and multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-eight patients were included. Median follow-up time was 52.76 months. 164/298 patients (55%) underwent ALR. Significantly more patients with cirrhosis received NALR (n = 94/134; p < 0.001). Complications according to the Clavien Dindo classification were significantly more frequent in the NALR group (p < 0.001). Liver failure occurred in 13% after ALR versus 8% after NALR (p < 0.215). Uni- and multivariate cox regression models showed no significant differences between the groups for recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, cirrhosis had no significant impact on OS and RFS. CONCLUSION: No significant differences on RFS and OS rates could be observed. Post-operative complications were significantly less frequent in the ALR group while liver specific complications were comparable between both groups. Subgroup analysis showed no significant influence of cirrhosis on the post-operative outcome of these patients.

Clinical and Analytical Performance of a Novel Point-of-Care High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Assay.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care (POC) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays may further accelerate the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the clinical and analytical performance of the novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI)-SPINCHIP POC test. METHODS: Adult patients presenting with acute chest discomfort to the emergency department were enrolled in an international, diagnostic, multicenter study. The final diagnosis was centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists using all clinical information. We compared the discriminatory performance of hs-cTnI-SPINCHIP with current established central laboratory assays and derived an assay-specific hs-cTnI-SPINCHIP 0/1-hour algorithm. Secondary analyses included sample type comparisons (whole blood, fresh/frozen plasma, and capillary finger prick) and precision analysis. RESULTS: MI was the adjudicated final diagnosis in 214 (19%) of 1,102 patients. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.95) for hs-cTnI-SPINCHIP vs 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.95) for hs-cTnI-Architect (P = 0.907) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95) for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T Elecsys (P = 0.305). A cutoff <7 ng/L at presentation (if chest pain onset was >3 hours) or <7 ng/L together with a 0/1-hour delta of <4 ng/L ruled out 51% with a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 97.7%-100%) and 100% (95% CI: 99.0%-100%), respectively. A hs-cTnI-SPINCHIP concentration ≥36 ng/L or a 0/1-hour delta ≥11 ng/L ruled in 27% with a specificity and positive predictive value of 90.9% (95% CI: 88.3%-92.9%) and 72.9% (95% CI: 66.4%-78.6%), respectively. Bootstrap internal validation confirmed excellent diagnostic performance. High agreement was observed between different sample types. CONCLUSIONS: The SPINCHIP hs-cTnI POC test has very high diagnostic accuracy. Its assay-specific 0/1-hour algorithm achieved very high sensitivity/negative predictive value and specificity/positive predictive value for rule-out/in MI. (Advantageous Predictors of Acute Coronary Syndromes Evaluation [APACE] Study [APACE]; NCT00470587).