[Evaluation of practices and costs of vasectomy. French monocentric experience]. / Évaluation des pratiques et des coûts de la vasectomie. Expérience monocentrique française.

INTRODUCTION: Since the law of 4 July 2001, vasectomy has been recognized as a method of male contraception. We report the experience of vasectomy practice in a hospital-university center. METHODS: A monocentric retrospective cohort study of 45 patients who benefited from a contraceptive vasectomy between July 2001 and May 2016. For each patient were studied: modalities of implementation, compliance with the recommendations of the 2001 law, costs and benefits generated by the intervention, the effectiveness of the gesture on the control spermograms, the satisfaction of the patients by a telephone questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean age was 41.3 years. The second consultation was carried out in 91 % of the cases but the reflection period was not respected in 24 % of the cases. Written consent was signed in 89 % of cases. Vasectomy was performed on an outpatient basis in 73 % of cases, under local anaesthesia in 6.7 % of cases. The average cost per patient was 660.63 euros for an average gain of 524.50 euros, a loss of 136.13 euros. On the control spermogram, 54.3 % were azoosperms but the 3-month delay was not observed in 23 % of them. No patients expressed regret after surgery. CONCLUSION: The recommendations of the 2001 law were not systematically followed. This lack of standardization of practices, potential reflection of a lack of interest, is to be highlighted with the extra cost generated. The revaluation of the act should be integrated into the reflection of improvement of male sterilization practices. LEVEL OF PROOF: 4.

Long-term outcomes of I-Stop TOMS™ male sling implantation for post-prostatectomy incontinence management.

OBJECTIVES: To report long-term outcomes after I-Stop TOMS™ implantation for PPI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was conducted in three tertiary reference centers. All consecutive patients implanted with an I-Stop TOMS™ sling between 2007 and 2012 for mild to moderate PPI (24-hour Pad test<400g) without history of pelvic radiation therapy were included. Evaluation had been conducted preoperatively, at one and six months postoperative and yearly thereafter. The main outcome criterion was the number of pads per day. Secondary criteria were International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ), SF-36 questionnaire, and complications. RESULTS: A hundred patients were evaluated with a median follow-up of 58months [19-78]. Pad use was significantly reduced and quality of life improved at last follow-up (P<0.0001). The percentage of patients dry and socially continent (0 or 1 pad) were 40% and 77% at 1 year, then dropped to 15% and 22%, respectively after 5years. Twelve patients were treated by artificial urinary sphincter implantation, five by ProACT™ balloons and one by a re-do I-Stop TOMS™. No severe complications were recorded at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: I-Stop TOMS™ implantation is a safe and effective option in the short-term for mild to moderate PPI management. However, a significant trend to recurrence of leakage has been established after long-term follow-up. If confirmed by further studies, these results may substantially impact patient information before male sling implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Prognostic factors for metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with second-line targeted therapies]. / Étude des facteurs pronostiques pour le carcinome rénal métastatique traité par une deuxième ligne de thérapies ciblées.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic value of clinical and biological features in patients treated with second-line targeted therapies (TT) for a metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed including 60 patients treated with second-line TT from 2006 to 2013. Clinical and biological features were collected, including TT-induced toxicities, Heng and MSKCC prognostic scores, and renal function. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The median age was 61 years [39-81]. MSKCC and Heng scores were significantly prognostic for OS and PFS (P<0.05). Hypo-albuminemia, anemia and brain metastasis were associated with poorer OS and PFS (P<0.05). Severe induced toxicities had a prognostic impact with higher OS (26 months vs 10 months, P=0.003) and PFS (5 months vs 4 months, P=0.047). Renal function impairment at the initiation of the second line was also associated with higher survival (OS=24 months vs 9 months, P=0.035 and PFS=7 months vs 4 months, P=0.043). On multivariate analysis, induced toxicity was found as an independent factor of good prognosis for OS (HR=0.36; P=0.01). CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that renal function impairment and TT-induced toxicities in the second line of treatment for mRCC have a potential prognostic interest as it had previously been reported for the first line of TT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

[Prognostic value of toxicities induced by targeted therapies in patients treated for a metastatic renal cell carcinoma]. / Valeur pronostique de la toxicité induite par les thérapies ciblées dans le carcinome rénal métastatique.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic value of clinical and biological variables in the era of targeted therapies, especially induced toxicity in patients treated for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was performed in patients treated in our center from 2006 to 2012. The clinical and biological variables and toxicity data were retrospectively collected. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the Log-Rank test. Multivariate analysis was also performed using the Cox model. RESULTS: One hundred and two patients were included, with a median follow-up of 20 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 21 months, and 6 months for the progression free survival (PFS). As expected, the variables included in the Mozter prognostic score had a significant impact on OS (P < 0.0001) and PFS (P < 0.0001). However, hypoalbuminemia (P < 0.0001), brain metastasis (P = 0.003) and the absence of nephrectomy (P < 0.0001) were found as poor prognosis factors for OS. In addition, severe toxicity (grade 3-4) was significantly associated with higher OS (P < 0.0001) and PFS (P = 0.0003) and appeared as an independent factor in multivariate analysis for OS (P = 0.02) and PFS (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Severe toxicity induced by targeted therapies was found as a prognostic factor increasing significantly the survival. Further studies are needed to assess the real value of this factor in the development of sequential therapies for the treatment of RCC.