Evidence-Based Approaches to Mitigate Workplace Violence From Patients and Visitors in Emergency Departments: A Rapid Review.

INTRODUCTION: This is a rapid review of the published evidence on the effectiveness of interventions for mitigating workplace violence against staff in hospital emergency departments. Focused on the specific needs of an urban emergency department in Canada, this project sought to address the question, "What interventions have evidence regarding effectiveness for addressing workplace patient/visitor violence toward staff in the emergency department?" METHODS: Following Cochrane Rapid Review methods, 5 electronic databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL) and Google Scholar were searched in April 2022 for intervention studies to reduce or mitigate workplace violence against staff in hospital emergency departments. Critical appraisal was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Key study findings were synthesized narratively. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies (21 individual studies, 3 reviews) were included in this rapid review. A variety of strategies for reducing and mitigating workplace violence were identified and categorized as single or multicomponent interventions. Although most studies reported positive outcomes on workplace violence, the articles offered limited descriptions of the interventions and/or lacked robust data to demonstrate effectiveness. Insights from across the studies offer knowledge users information to support the development of comprehensive strategies to reduce workplace violence. DISCUSSION: Despite a large body of literature on workplace violence, there is little guidance on effective strategies to mitigate workplace violence in emergency departments. Evidence suggests that multicomponent approaches targeting staff, patients/visitors, and the emergency department environment are essential to addressing and mitigating workplace violence. More research is needed that provides robust evidence on effective violence prevention interventions.

Technology-Related Safety Events in Primary and Community Care Settings: A Scoping Review.

This scoping review assesses the current knowledge on technology-related safety events in primary and community care settings, focusing on patient safety and harm. Utilizing Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across various databases, yielding 17 relevant articles. The review highlighted predominant safety event issues, such as technology limitations, incorrect data, and software malfunctions, and identified essential risk mitigation strategies. Consultation with healthcare leaders reinforced these findings and revealed additional organizational challenges, emphasizing the need for continuous monitoring, reporting, and analyzing of HIT-related safety concerns. The findings suggest that while safety events in non-acute settings share similarities with those in acute care, they require specific attention and further research.

Technology-Related Safety Event Analysis in Community Clinical Informatics: A Case Study.

This case study presents a process that was iteratively developed for clinical informaticians to identify, analyse, and respond to safety events related to health information technologies (HIT) in community care settings (This research was supported by the CIHR Health Systems Impact Fellowship Program. We would also like to thank Vancouver Coastal Health for their valuable contributions.). The goal was to build capacity within a clinical informatics team to integrate patient safety into their work and to help them recognize and respond to HIT-related safety events. The technology-related safety event analysis process that was ultimately developed included three key components: 1) an internal workflow to analyse voluntarily reported HIT-related safety events using a sociotechnical model, 2) safety huddles to amplify learnings from reviewed events, and 3) a cumulative analysis of all events over time to identify and respond to patterns. A systematic approach to quickly identify and understand HIT safety concerns enables informatics teams to proactively reduce risks and prevent harm.

Clinical Informatics Team Members' Perspectives on Health Information Technology Safety After Experiential Learning and Safety Process Development: Qualitative Descriptive Study.

BACKGROUND: Although intended to support improvement, the rapid adoption and evolution of technologies in health care can also bring about unintended consequences related to safety. In this project, an embedded researcher with expertise in patient safety and clinical education worked with a clinical informatics team to examine safety and harm related to health information technologies (HITs) in primary and community care settings. The clinical informatics team participated in learning activities around relevant topics (eg, human factors, high reliability organizations, and sociotechnical systems) and cocreated a process to address safety events related to technology (ie, safety huddles and sociotechnical analysis of safety events). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore clinical informaticians' experiences of incorporating safety practices into their work. METHODS: We used a qualitative descriptive design and conducted web-based focus groups with clinical informaticians. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: A total of 10 informants participated. Barriers to addressing safety and harm in their context included limited prior knowledge of HIT safety, previous assumptions and perspectives, competing priorities and organizational barriers, difficulty with the reporting system and processes, and a limited number of reports for learning. Enablers to promoting safety and mitigating harm included participating in learning sessions, gaining experience analyzing reported events, participating in safety huddles, and role modeling and leadership from the embedded researcher. Individual outcomes included increased ownership and interest in HIT safety, the development of a sociotechnical systems perspective, thinking differently about safety, and increased consideration for user perspectives. Team outcomes included enhanced communication within the team, using safety events to inform future work and strategic planning, and an overall promotion of a culture of safety. CONCLUSIONS: As HITs are integrated into care delivery, it is important for clinical informaticians to recognize the risks related to safety. Experiential learning activities, including reviewing safety event reports and participating in safety huddles, were identified as particularly impactful. An HIT safety learning initiative is a feasible approach for clinical informaticians to become more knowledgeable and engaged in HIT safety issues in their work.

Mapping Trust in Nurses with Dimensions of Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review.

This scoping review examines the concept of trust in nursing and its potential application in developing trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (AI) for healthcare. Recognizing nurses as highly trusted professionals, the study explores how attributes contributing to trust in nursing can inform AI development. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute framework, the review synthesizes literature on patients' perceptions of nurses' trustworthiness and compares these with desired qualities in trustworthy AI. Preliminary findings suggest that nursing's trust-inducing actions could offer valuable insights for implementing trust-enhancing features in AI. This approach aims to bring innovative insights into the nature of trust and contribute to creative solutions to develop trustworthy AI in healthcare. By aligning AI development with principles of trust observed in nursing, the review proposes novel strategies for creating more ethical and accepted AI systems in healthcare settings.

Characterization of Safety Events Involving Technology in Primary and Community Care.

BACKGROUND: The adoption of technology in health care settings is often touted as an opportunity to improve patient safety. While some adverse events can be reduced by health information technologies, technology has also been implicated in or attributed to safety events. To date, most studies on this topic have focused on acute care settings. OBJECTIVES: To describe voluntarily reported safety events that involved health information technology in community and primary care settings in a large Canadian health care organization. METHODS: Two years of safety events involving health information technology (2016-2018) were extracted from an online voluntary safety event reporting system. Events from primary and community care settings were categorized according to clinical setting, type of event, and level of harm. The Sittig and Singh sociotechnical system model was then used to identify the most prominent sociotechnical dimensions of each event. RESULTS: Of 104 reported events, most (n = 85, 82%) indicated the event resulted in no harm. Public health had the highest number of reports (n = 45, 43%), whereas home health had the fewest (n = 7, 7%). Of the 182 sociotechnical concepts identified, many events (n = 61, 59%) mapped to more than one dimension. Personnel (n = 48, 46%), Workflow and Communication (n = 37, 36%), and Content (n = 30, 29%) were the most common. Personnel and Content together was the most common combination of dimensions. CONCLUSION: Most reported events featured both technical and social dimensions, suggesting that the nature of these events is multifaceted. Leveraging existing safety event reporting systems to screen for safety events involving health information technology, and applying a sociotechnical analytic framework can aid health organizations in identifying, responding to, and learning from reported events.