Secukinumab in moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (SUNSHINE and SUNRISE): week 16 and week 52 results of two identical, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 trials.

BACKGROUND: Few therapeutic options are available for patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa. We aimed to assess the efficacy of secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa in two randomised trials. METHODS: SUNSHINE and SUNRISE were identical, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 trials done in 219 primary sites in 40 countries. Patients aged 18 years old or older with the capacity to provide written informed consent and with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (defined as a total of ≥5 inflammatory lesions affecting ≥2 distinct anatomical areas) for at least 1 year were eligible for inclusion. Included patients also agreed to daily use of topical over-the-counter antiseptics on the areas affected by hidradenitis suppurativa lesions while on study treatment. Patients were excluded if they had 20 or more fistulae at baseline, had ongoing active conditions requiring treatment with prohibited medication (eg, systemic biological immunomodulating treatment, live vaccines, or other investigational treatments), or met other exclusion criteria. In both trials, patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by means of interactive response technology to receive subcutaneous secukinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks, subcutaneous secukinumab 300 mg every 4 weeks, or subcutaneous placebo all via a 2 mL prefilled syringe in a double-dummy method as per treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response, defined as a decrease in abscess and inflammatory nodule count by 50% or more with no increase in the number of abscesses or in the number of draining fistulae compared with baseline, at week 16, assessed in the overall population. Hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response was calculated based on the number of abscesses, inflammatory nodules, draining fistulae, total fistulae, and other lesions in the hidradenitis suppurativa affected areas. Safety was assessed by evaluating the presence of adverse events and serious adverse events according to common terminology criteria for adverse events, which were coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terminology. Both the SUNSHINE, NCT03713619, and SUNRISE, NCT03713632, trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. FINDINGS: Between Jan 31, 2019, and June 7, 2021, 676 patients were screened for inclusion in the SUNSHINE trial, of whom 541 (80%; 304 [56%] women and 237 [44%] men; mean age 36·1 years [SD 11·7]) were included in the analysis (181 [33%] in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group, 180 [33%] in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group, and 180 [33%] in the placebo group). Between the same recruitment dates, 687 patients were screened for inclusion in the SUNRISE trial, of whom 543 (79%; 306 [56%] women and 237 [44%] men; mean age 36·3 [11·4] years) were included in the analysis (180 [33%] in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group, 180 [33%] in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group, and 183 [34%] in the placebo group). In the SUNSHINE trial, significantly more patients in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group had a hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (rounded average number of patients with response in 100 imputations, 81·5 [45%] of 181 patients) compared with the placebo group (60·7 [34%] of 180 patients; odds ratio 1·8 [95% CI 1·1-2·7]; p=0·0070). However, there was no significant difference between the number of patients in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group (75·2 [42%] of 180 patients) and the placebo group (1·5 [1·0-2·3]; p=0·042). Compared with the placebo group (57·1 [31%] of 183 patients), significantly more patients in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group (76·2 [42%] of 180 patients; 1·6 [1·1-2·6]; p=0·015) and the secukinumab every 4 weeks group (83·1 [46%] of 180 patients; 1·9 [1·2-3·0]; p=0·0022) had a hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response in the SUNRISE trial. Patient responses were sustained up to the end of the trials at week 52. The most common adverse event by preferred term up to week 16 was headache in both the SUNSHINE (17 [9%] patients in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group, 20 [11%] in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group, and 14 [8%] in the placebo group) and SUNRISE (21 [12%] patients in the secukinumab every 2 weeks group, 17 [9%] in the secukinumab every 4 weeks group, and 15 [8%] in the placebo group) trials. No study-related deaths were reported up to week 16. The safety profile of secukinumab in both trials was consistent with that previously reported, with no new or unexpected safety findings detected. INTERPRETATION: When given every 2 weeks, secukinumab was clinically effective at rapidly improving signs and symptoms of hidradenitis suppurativa with a favourable safety profile and with sustained response up to 52 weeks of treatment. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma.

Compared burden of psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, hidradenitis suppurativa and chronic urticaria: baseline characteristics of the patients included in the OMCCI cohort, a French, prospective multicentre study of chronic inflammatory dermatoses.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic inflammatory dermatoses (CIDs) can significantly affect patients' lives. The Observatory of Chronic Inflammatory Skin Diseases (OMCCI) cohort was initiated to quantify the impact and disease evolution of four CID over 4 years' follow-up; at least 1,000 patients per CID are planned to be enrolled. To present baseline characteristics of patients included in the OMCCI cohort between December 2020 and September 2022. METHODS: This French, prospective, multicentre registry included adult patients treated in daily practice for moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PS), atopic dermatitis (AD), hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) or chronic urticaria (CU) starting or modifying a systemic treatment. At the inclusion visit and then every 6 months during 4 years, patient-reported outcomes and data on these diseases and their treatments are recorded. RESULTS: A total of 2,058 patients from 24 centers were included: 1,137 PS, 413 AD, 301 HS, and 207 CU. Of these, 1,950 patients started or changed systemic treatment and 108 reduced the dose of existing systemic treatment. Disease impact was qualified as debilitating by 80.1% (PS), 90.5% (AD), 90.5% (HS), and 89.4% (CU), affecting daily, family, and professional life. According to the SF-12 Survey, the impact of all four diseases was borderline pathological for physical health and severe for mental health. At inclusion, 20.4% of patients were receiving a conventional systemic or biologic treatment. After the first visit this percentage raised to 83.3%. During the 6 months preceding study inclusion, 17.7% (PS), 27.9% (AD), 43.1% (HS), and 43.6% (CU) of patients missed work due to their illness, and 26.3% of patients with HS had been admitted to hospital (vs. 8.1%, 5.8%, and 13% of patients with PS, AD, or CU, respectively). CONCLUSION: These CIDs (especially HS) had a major impact on all aspects of patients' quality of life. The low baseline use of systemic drugs and the high burden of these CIDs suggests that these agents are underused. Long-term and dynamic evaluation of the changes brought by the initiation or optimization of these treatments on the evolution of patients' lives will be studied prospectively during the 4-year follow-up of the OMCCI.

Evolution of dupilumab-associated conjunctivitis in patients with atopic dermatitis after switching dupilumab to tralokinumab or Janus kinase inhibitors (RESO-ADOC study).

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials and real-life data have reported an increased incidence of conjunctivitis in patients treated with dupilumab for their atopic dermatitis (AD). Although mostly mild in severity, in some cases conjunctivitis will appear or increase after dupilumab initiation, which can lead to dupilumab discontinuation. OBJECTIVES: (1) To describe the characteristics of patients developing conjunctivitis requiring discontinuation of dupilumab; and (2) to analyse the factors associated with a complete conjunctivitis improvement after dupilumab discontinuation and a switch to tralokinumab or Janus kinase inhibitors. METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study that included all patients with AD treated with dupilumab who developed conjunctivitis leading to dupilumab discontinuation and switching to tralokinumab or Janus kinase inhibitors in daily practice. Data on patients, their AD and conjunctivitis were analysed at the inclusion visit (corresponding to discontinuation of dupilumab and the institution of new AD treatment), at visit 2 (3-6 months after inclusion) and at visit 3 (corresponding to the last medical visit). RESULTS: After multivariate analysis, the only factors associated with a complete resolution of dupilumab-associated conjunctivitis at visit 2 and/or visit 3 were conjunctivitis duration (OR 8.98, 95% CI 1.47-55) (p = 0.018), personal history of asthma (OR 10.66, 95% CI 1.82-62.63) (p = 0.009) and switching from dupilumab to Janus kinase inhibitors (OR 17.11, 95% CI 2.94-99.66) (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Although uncommon, severe dupilumab-associated conjunctivitis is more frequent in daily life compared to its incidence in the dupilumab pivotal trials. In these cases, our study suggests that a rapid switch to another molecule, particularly a Janus kinase inhibitor, should be considered.

Impact of Baricitinib on Patients' Quality of Life after One Year of Treatment for Atopic Dermatitis in Real-World Practice: Results of the Observatory of Chronic Inflammatory Skin Diseases Registry.

The efficacy and safety of baricitinib for treatment of atopic dermatitis have been demonstrated in clinical trials; however, very few real-life studies have been published to date. The Observatory of Chronic Inflammatory Skin Diseases (OMCCI) registry was initiated to prospectively determine the long-term impairment caused by chronic inflammatory dermatoses on patients' lives. The study included 88 patients starting baricitinib for treatment of atopic dermatitis. Clinical evaluation and patient-reported outcomes were recorded at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. After 6 months and 1 year of follow-up, 65 and 47 patients, respectively, were still being treated with baricitinib. Treatment failure was the main reason for discontinuation. Only 1 patient stopped baricitinib because of a side-effect. After 1 year of follow-up, the mean Eczema Area and Severity Index score decreased significantly from 20.7 to 6.4; the percentage of patients with severe atopic dermatitis decreased from 42.9% to 6.5% and a significant improvement in most patient-reported outcomes was noted. There was no difference in terms of efficacy whether or not patients were previously treated with dupilumab. The results remained stable after 6 and 12 months of treatment, which suggests a sustained efficacy of the treatment in patients who initially responded well.

Treatment of dissecting cellulitis of the scalp with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a retrospective multicentre study.

Although retinoids are considered as the most effective treatment, management of dissecting cellulitis of the scalp (DCS) is often challenging. A multicentre retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents in treating DCS after failure of other conventional treatments. Twenty-six patients were included. After a mean treatment duration of 19 months (SD 21), the median Physician's Global Assessment score decreased from 3 to 1. The median number of inflammatory nodules and abscesses decreased from 7 to 0.5 and from 1 to 0, respectively. The median Dermatology Life Quality Index and numerical rating scale score for pain severity decreased from 10 to 8 and 6 to 1, respectively. The median treatment satisfaction was 7 out of 10 on the Patient Satisfaction Index. This study confirms the efficacy of anti-TNF agents in treating patients with DCS that is resistant to conventional therapies.

Switching biologics in children with psoriasis: Results from the BiPe cohort.

BACKGROUND: There is currently little information on switching biologics in pediatric psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the real-world clinical practice and safety of switching biologics in the "Biological Treatments for Pediatric Psoriasis" (BiPe) cohort. METHODS: Data for all 134 patients included in the BiPe cohort were analyzed. A further evaluation of the subpopulation of patients who switched from a first-line biologic to a second-line biologic was then conducted. Drug survival rates were also compared between biologics given as first-line or second-line agents. RESULTS: Overall, 29 patients (female: 55%; mean age: 16.6 ± 3.0 years) switched between two biologics. Etanercept (ETN) was the first-line biologic used in 23 patients: 16 (69.6%) switched to adalimumab (ADA) and seven (30.4%) to ustekinumab (UST). Six patients received first-line ADA and switched to UST. Loss of efficacy (62.1%), primary inefficacy (20.7%), and parental choice (6.9%) were the main reasons for switching biologics. One (3.4%) of the switches was performed because of adverse events or intolerance. For UST and ADA, the 18-month drug survival rate did not differ according to whether the agent was given as a first-line or second-line biologic (UST: P = .24; ADA: P = .68). No significant differences in drug survival rates were observed between the three different switches (ADA to UST, ETN to ADA, and ETN to UST). CONCLUSION: Our study provided key insights into the real-life clinical practice of switching biologics in pediatric psoriasis patients. However, more information and guidance on switching biologics in pediatric psoriasis are needed to improve real-life practice and outcomes.

Adalimumab Dose Intensification in Recalcitrant Hidradenitis Suppurativa/Acne Inversa.

BACKGROUND: Adalimumab is the only approved compound for the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) who did not respond to a systemic classical treatment. Despite its significant short- and long-term efficacy, a percentage of patients do not respond sufficiently. Moreover, some primary responders experience a response loss with time. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effectiveness of adalimumab dose intensification in HS patients. METHODS: A case series of adalimumab 80 mg/week subcutaneously (s.c.) compassionate use in patients with HS, who did not respond sufficiently or in primary responders with progressive response loss to the registered adalimumab dose of 40 mg/week s.c. Patients were collected and evaluated retrospectively. Patients' data were extracted from medical records. RESULTS: The 14 patients collected were Caucasian with HS of Hurley stage II-III and moderate or severe International HS Severity Score System (IHS4) stage. Adalimumab dose intensification significantly improved IHS4 score, Pain Index, HS-Physician Global Assessment, pain, and Cardiff Dermatology Life Quality Index. Two young female patients with HS and Crohn's disease developed psoriatic lesions during the treatment with adalimumab 80 mg/week s.c. CONCLUSION: An enhanced level of effectiveness was assessed in the majority of the HS patients treated with adalimumab dose intensification (80 mg/week s.c.). Larger studies are required to evaluate this observation.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Chronic Inflammatory Dermatoses: Mixed Messages Regarding the Dermatologist's Point of View and the Patient's Concerns.

is missing (Short communication).

Effectiveness and Safety of Anti-interleukin-17 Therapies in Elderly Patients with Psoriasis.

Anti-interleukin-17 agents have recently been developed for the treatment of psoriasis. This study evaluated the tolerance and effectiveness of anti-interleukin-17 agents for psoriasis in elderly patients in daily practice. A multicentre, retrospective study was performed, involving psoriatic patients aged ≥65 years who had received an anti-interleukin-17 agent, including secukinumab, ixekizumab or brodalumab. A total of 114 patients were included: 72 received secukinumab, 35 ixekizumab, and 7 brodalumab. Treatment was stopped in 32 patients (28.9%), because of relapses in 14 patients (41.2%), primary failures in 11 patients (32.4%), or adverse events in 7 patients (20.6%). The 3 most frequently reported adverse events were injection site reactions (n = 4), oral candidiasis (n = 3), and influenza-like illness (n = 3). Regarding effectiveness, 80 patients (70%) reached a Physician Global Assessment score of 0/1, 6 months after treatment initiation. In conclusion, anti-interleukin-17 therapy appears to be an effective and safe therapeutic option for psoriasis treatment in patients aged ≥ 65 years.

Two Phase 3 Trials of Adalimumab for Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa is a painful, chronic inflammatory skin disease with few options for effective treatment. In a phase 2 trial, adalimumab, an antibody against tumor necrosis factor α, showed efficacy against hidradenitis suppurativa. METHODS: PIONEER I and II were similarly designed, phase 3 multicenter trials of adalimumab for hidradenitis suppurativa, with two double-blind, placebo-controlled periods. In period 1, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to 40 mg of adalimumab weekly or matching placebo for 12 weeks. In period 2, patients were reassigned to adalimumab at a weekly or every-other-week dose or to placebo for 24 weeks. The primary end point was a clinical response, defined as at least a 50% reduction from baseline in the abscess and inflammatory-nodule count, with no increase in abscess or draining-fistula counts, at week 12. RESULTS: We enrolled 307 patients in PIONEER I and 326 in PIONEER II. Clinical response rates at week 12 were significantly higher for the groups receiving adalimumab weekly than for the placebo groups: 41.8% versus 26.0% in PIONEER I (P=0.003) and 58.9% versus 27.6% in PIONEER II (P<0.001). Patients receiving adalimumab had significantly greater improvement than the placebo groups in rank-ordered secondary outcomes (lesions, pain, and the modified Sartorius score for disease severity) at week 12 in PIONEER II only. Serious adverse events in period 1 (excluding worsening of underlying disease) occurred in 1.3% of patients receiving adalimumab and 1.3% of those receiving placebo in PIONEER I and in 1.8% and 3.7% of patients, respectively, in PIONEER II. In period 2, the rates of serious adverse events were 4.6% or less in all the groups in both studies, with no significant between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with adalimumab (40 mg weekly), as compared with placebo, resulted in significantly higher clinical response rates in both trials at 12 weeks; rates of serious adverse events were similar in the study groups. (Funded by AbbVie; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01468207 and NCT01468233 for PIONEER I and PIONEER II, respectively.).

Matrix remodelling and MMP expression/activation are associated with hidradenitis suppurativa skin inflammation.

Hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory, recurrent, debilitating skin disease of the hair follicle, associated with considerable tissue remodelling. Although abnormal cytokine expression was detected both in perilesional and in uninvolved skin, up to now there is no model allowing a better understanding of the implicit inflammatory mechanisms in HS. The aim of this study was to investigate the inflammatory response in HS skin by mean of an ex vivo model culture. To that purpose, nine skin biopsy specimens from patients suffering from HS and controls were cultured up to 4 days. Microscopy imaging investigations showed variations of collagen I and III organization, and an increase in elastin fibres fragmentation in HS skin after 4 days of culture. The HS matrix structure remodelling was associated with high level of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in HS lesional skin. After 4 days of culture, the MMP expression in HS perilesional skin reached the level observed in HS lesional skin. Concomitantly, an increase in IL-1ß concentration was observed in all skin samples after 4 days of culture, although IL-1ß concentrations remained significantly higher in HS lesional skin as compared with control skin. Meanwhile, neither IL-17 concentrations nor the inflammasome components NLRP3 and caspase-1 varied. Thus, our HS skin model culture showed that MMP-induced matrix alteration could participate in HS inflammation by releasing biological active peptides and inflammatory factors from the extracellular matrix (ECM), and open new opportunities to investigate the regulation of the inflammatory mechanism associated with HS.

Effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in a real-life French multicenter adult cohort.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is the first biologic available to treat atopic dermatitis (AD). Its effectiveness and safety were demonstrated in clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adults with AD in a real-life French multicenter retrospective cohort. METHODS: We included patients treated during March 2017-April 2018. Efficacy outcomes, including Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) and Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores, were collected at baseline and 3 months when available. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded at follow-up. RESULTS: We included 241 patients. The median ± interquartile range (IQR) follow-up time was 3.8 ± 3.7 months. A ≥75% improvement in SCORAD was achieved in 27 of 163 (16.6%) patients, and a ≥75% improvement in EASI was achieved in 40 of 82 (48.8%) patients. The median SCORAD and EASI scores at 3 months were significantly lower than those at baseline (SCORAD ± IQR, 25 ± 21 vs 56 ± 27.4, P < 10-9 and EASI ± IQR, 4.1 ± 6.8 vs 17.9 ± 15.4, P < 10-9, respectively). Conjunctivitis was reported in 84 of 241 (38.2%) patients. The proportion with eosinophilia (>500 cells/mm3) during follow-up (57%) was higher than that at baseline (33.7%) (n = 172, P < 10-6). Dupilumab was stopped in 42 cases; 27 patients stopped because of AEs. LIMITATIONS: No control group, missing data. CONCLUSION: This real-life study demonstrated a similar dupilumab effectiveness as that seen in clinical trials, but it also revealed a higher frequency of conjunctivitis and eosinophilia.

A systematic review of dimensions evaluating patient experience in chronic illness.

BACKGROUND: Living with a chronic disease often means experiencing chronic treatments and regular multidisciplinary monitoring as well as a profound life-changing experience which may impact all aspects of a patients life. The patient experience of chronic disease is frequently assessed by patient reported measures (PRMs) which incorporate patients perspectives to better understand how illness, treatment and care impact the entirety of a patient's life. The purpose of this review was to collect and review different kinds of available PRM instruments validated for chronic patients, to produce an inventory of explored concepts in these questionnaires and to identify and classify all dimensions assessing chronic patients experience. METHODS: A systematic review of PRM instruments validated for chronic patients was conducted from three databases (Medline, the Cochrane library, and Psycinfo). Articles were selected after a double reading and questionnaires were classified according to their targeted concept. Then, all dimensions of the questionnaires were clustered into different categories. RESULTS: 107 primary validation studies of PRM questionnaires were selected. Five kinds of instruments were recorded: 1) Questionnaires assessing health related quality of life or quality of life; 2) Instruments focusing on symptoms and functional status; 3) Instruments exploring patients' feelings and attitude about illness; 4) Questionnaires related to patients' experience of treatment or healthcare; 5) Instruments assessing patients attitudes about treatment or healthcare. Twelve categories of dimensions were obtained from these instruments. CONCLUSIONS: This review provided an overview of some of the dimensions used to explore chronic patient experience. A large PRM diversity exists and none of the reviewed and selected questionnaires covered all identified categories of dimensions of patient experience of chronic disease. Furthermore, the definition of explored concepts varies widely among researchers and complex concepts often lack a clear definition in the reviewed articles. Before attempting to measure chronic patient experience, researchers should construct appropriate instruments focusing on well-defined concepts and dimensions encompassing patient's personal experience, attitude and adaptation to illness, treatment or healthcare.

[New therapeutic strategies in psoriasis]. / Nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques dans le psoriasis.

New therapeutic strategies in psoriasis. Since the early 2000s, the management of psoriasis has undergone a dramatic evolution favored by a better knowledge of the inflammatory mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of the disease. The identification of new therapeutic targets has led to the emergence of new therapeutic classes including biotherapies. Treatment strategies have been refined and standardized with increasingly ambitious therapeutic goals and more focused on the patient as part of a global and multidisciplinary management.

Évaluation clinique d'un patient atteint de psoriasis. Depuis le début des années 2000, la prise en charge du psoriasis a connu une évolution spectaculaire favorisée par une meilleure connaissance des mécanismes inflammatoires impliqués dans la physiopathogénie de la maladie. L'identification de nouvelles cibles thérapeutiques a permis l'émergence de nouvelles classes thérapeutiques et notamment des biothérapies. Les stratégies de traitement se sont affinées et standardisées, avec des objectifs thérapeutiques de plus en plus ambitieux et de plus en plus centrés sur le patient dans le cadre d'une prise en charge globale et multidisciplinaire.

Socioeconomic Inequalities and Severity of Plaque Psoriasis at a First Consultation in Dermatology Centers.

Psoriasis has major physical, psychological, and social impacts: its management should not be restricted by individual financial considerations in Western countries as these have well-structured health systems and social/insurance coverage. We investigated if the socioeconomic characteristics of patients were associated with severity of psoriasis and access to healthcare. In a cross-sectional study, we included 903 patients with psoriasis that were consulting for the first time. We showed that low educational level was associated with severity of disease in multivariate analyses. Moreover, patients of lower class and lower educational level, with severe psoriasis, had seen fewer physicians and had less frequently received a systemic treatment. Thus, physicians need to be vigilante of patients with a low socioeconomic status. Both low socioeconomic status and less access to dermatologists are associated with clinical severity of psoriasis at a first consultation.

Efficacy and Safety of Methotrexate Combined with Low- to Moderate-Dose Corticosteroids for Severe Alopecia Areata.

BACKGROUND: In severe alopecia areata (AA), spontaneous recovery is unlikely, and treatment is not standardized. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of methotrexate (MTX) used alone or combined with low- to moderate-dose oral corticosteroids (OC) for treating severe AA (totalis, universalis and severe multifocal). METHODS: Retrospective monocentric study of all consecutive patients receiving this treatment between 2006 and 2012. Efficacy was defined as achieving a total regrowth of terminal hair. RESULTS: 26 patients were included (17 with AA universalis or totalis and 9 with severe multifocal AA). Total regrowth was noted in 15/26 patients. After 3 months of treatment, hair regrowth >80% was associated with further complete regrowth, and hair regrowth <30% was associated with later treatment failure (p = 0.0014). When treatment was tapered, 11/15 patients with initial complete efficacy experienced AA relapse. CONCLUSION: MTX combined with low- to moderate-dose OC may be an efficient and well-tolerated treatment for severe AA. However, long-term maintenance treatment is usually required.

[Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in psoriatic arthritis after anti-TNFα failure in routine practice]. / Ustekinumab dans le rhumatisme psoriasique après échec des anti-TNFα en pratique courante.

PURPOSE: Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in psoriatic arthritis after anti-TNFα failure. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective and monocentric study. The evaluation of articular and cutaneous effectiveness by the patient was made with numeric scale and satisfaction scale and by the physician during a rhumatological-dermatological consultation. The safety was analyzed by collecting the adverse effects. RESULTS: Nine patients with anti-TNF failure were included. Five of them stopped the treatment because of severe adverse effects. The mean duration treatment of ustekinumab was 24 months. Articular and cutaneous effectiveness were respectively 4.4/10 and 6.7/10. Two thirds of the patients were "satisfied" and one third could stop any analgesic treatment. The mean PASI score decreased from 8.4 to 1.7 after 3 months treatment. Only minor adverse effects were collected and there were no recidivism of the adverse effects observed with anti-TNFα. CONCLUSION: Ustekinumab is an effective and safe alternative for patients with anti-TNFα failure in psoriatic arthritis.

Assessment of bullous pemphigoid disease area index during treatment: a prospective study of 30 patients.

BACKGROUND: Recently, a consensus Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) was proposed to measure therapeutic outcomes in bullous pemphigoid (BP). OBJECTIVE: To compare BPDAI with other clinical parameters of disease activity at baseline and to describe the variations of BPDAI during the initial phase of treatment. METHODS: Thirty BP patients were included and followed for 1 year. BPDAI was assessed at baseline and on days 30, 90 and 360 by the same investigator. Concomitantly, the number of daily new blisters, the skin surface area of erythematous/eczematous/urticarial plaques and blisters/erosions, total lesion area (TLA), pruritus score and mucosal involvement were recorded. RESULTS: At baseline, BPDAI was 46.7 ± 25 (mean ± SD); it was well correlated with erythematous/eczematous/urticarial skin surface (r = 0.63), TLA (r = 0.83), number of daily new blisters (r = 0.7; p ≤ 0.0002) and anti-BP180 autoantibodies (r = 0.49; p = 0.006), but not with anti-BP230 autoantibodies. For the 8 patients with severe BP at baseline, the mean BPDAI was 76.5, versus 35.9 for moderate BP (p = 0.0007). A value of 56 was proposed as a cut-off value for severe BP. BPDAI decreased to 11.9 ± 8.7, 10.7 ± 12.7 and 2.5 ± 4.1 on days 30, 90 and 360, respectively. CONCLUSION: BPDAI rapidly decreased during the early treatment stage of BP with variations almost totally conditioned by the skin activity component.