Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(46)2021 11 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34753819

RESUMEN

Recent developments in the biology of malignant gliomas have demonstrated that glioma cells interact with neurons through both paracrine signaling and electrochemical synapses. Glioma-neuron interactions consequently modulate the excitability of local neuronal circuits, and it is unclear the extent to which glioma-infiltrated cortex can meaningfully participate in neural computations. For example, gliomas may result in a local disorganization of activity that impedes the transient synchronization of neural oscillations. Alternatively, glioma-infiltrated cortex may retain the ability to engage in synchronized activity in a manner similar to normal-appearing cortex but exhibit other altered spatiotemporal patterns of activity with subsequent impact on cognitive processing. Here, we use subdural electrocorticography to sample both normal-appearing and glioma-infiltrated cortex during speech. We find that glioma-infiltrated cortex engages in synchronous activity during task performance in a manner similar to normal-appearing cortex but recruits a diffuse spatial network. On a temporal scale, we show that signals from glioma-infiltrated cortex have decreased entropy, which may affect its ability to encode information during nuanced tasks such as production of monosyllabic versus polysyllabic words. Furthermore, we show that temporal decoding strategies for distinguishing monosyllabic from polysyllabic words were feasible for signals arising from normal-appearing cortex but not from glioma-infiltrated cortex. These findings inform our understanding of cognitive processing in chronic disease states and have implications for neuromodulation and prosthetics in patients with malignant gliomas.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/fisiopatología , Glioma/fisiopatología , Habla/fisiología , Adulto , Corteza Cerebral/fisiopatología , Electrocorticografía/métodos , Humanos , Neuronas/fisiología , Lóbulo Temporal/fisiopatología
2.
J Neurooncol ; 148(1): 131-139, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32350780

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Under-enrollment in clinical trials significantly limits valid analyses of clinical interventions and generalizability of findings. Often it results in premature study termination, with estimates of 22% to 50% of clinical trials terminated due to poor accrual. Currently, there are limited reports addressing the influence of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status on clinical trial enrollment in adult glioma patients. The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that race and socioeconomic status negatively impact therapeutic clinical trial enrollment. METHODS: 988 adult patients were identified from the UCSF Tumor Board Registry and analyzed to determine the rate of therapeutic clinical trial screening and study enrollment. RESULTS: At initial diagnosis, 43.6% and 17.5% of glioma patients were screened and enrolled in a therapeutic clinical trial, respectively. At recurrence, 49.8% and 26.3% of patients were screened and enrolled in a clinical trial, respectively. Thirty-three percent of the study population belonged to a NIH-designated underrepresented minority group; Asian/Pacific-Islander comprised 19.6% of the overall cohort. On univariate analysis, only in-state location, distance to the hospital, and WHO grade were associated with enrollment at initial diagnosis and recurrence. Minority status, insurance type, median household income, and percent below poverty were not associated with clinical trial enrollment. CONCLUSION: Minority and socioeconomic status did not impact adult glioma clinical trial enrollment. Proximity to the tertiary care cancer center may be an important consideration for minority patients. Patient screening should be carefully considered in order to avoid bias based on minority and socioeconomic status.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Glioma/terapia , Selección de Paciente , Factores Raciales , Clase Social , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
3.
Cureus ; 14(11): e31588, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36540463

RESUMEN

Cadaveric shortages have been a challenge to anatomy education; as access remains low in many parts of the world, institutions are relying on plastinated specimens. Plastination typically requires the use of complex equipment and patented chemicals. While models solve cost and toxicity issues, in neuroanatomical education, the rigidity prevents deep-brain structure exploration and visual-spatial learning. The Elnady technique (ET) developed by Dr. Fawzy Elnady is an alternative method that solves the limitations of traditional plastination while maintaining the advantages previously developed in animal models.  The superficial temporal artery (STA), brain stem, cerebellum, right hemisphere, and latex-injected cortex were previously embalmed, drained of their original solution, dehydrated in acetone baths, and hydrometer readings were taken. Specimens were placed in a glycerol bath, immersed in cornstarch and cured. Quantitative and qualitative data of weight (grams), size (millimeters), color, texture, and odor were obtained before and after processing the samples. Overall, specimens showed a change of 6.5% in weight, 8.5% in height, 4.8% in width, and 8.9% in length (millimeters) after the preservation process. The products had pliable texture, no change in color grossly and no detectable odor. The measurement of weight (grams) ranges from 0-15.7%, height from 0-12.3%, width from 0-11.1%, and length from 1.7-5.9%. The ET is an effective method for the preservation of human cadaveric specimens that produces quality samples from embalmed specimens. Preservation can be done without patented chemicals and special storage methods are usually required for plastination. It is an ideal technique for basic and/or low-resource settings and could resolve expenses related to acquiring and maintaining cadaveric brain specimens.

4.
Neuro Oncol ; 24(8): 1341-1349, 2022 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34999844

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The NIH Revitalization Act, implemented 29 years ago, set to improve the representation of women and minorities in clinical trials. In this study, we investigate progress made in all phase therapeutic clinical trials for neuroepithelial CNS tumors stratified by demographic-specific age-adjusted disease incidence and mortality. Additionally, we identify workforce characteristics associated with clinical trials meeting established accrual benchmarks. METHODS: Registry study of published clinical trials for World Health Organization defined neuroepithelial CNS tumors between January 2000 and December 2019. Study participants were obtained from PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. Population-based data originated from the CBTRUS for incidence analyses. SEER-18 Incidence-Based Mortality data was used for mortality analysis. Descriptive statistics, Fisher exact, and χ 2 tests were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Among 662 published clinical trials representing 49 907 participants, 62.5% of participants were men and 37.5% women (P < .0001) representing a mortality specific over-accrual for men (P = .001). Whites, Asians, Blacks, and Hispanics represented 91.7%, 1.5%, 2.6%, and 1.7% of trial participants. Compared with mortality, Blacks (47% of expected mortality, P = .008), Hispanics (17% of expected mortality, P < .001) and Asians (33% of expected mortality, P < .001) were underrepresented compared with Whites (114% of expected mortality, P < .001). Clinical trials meeting accrual benchmarks for race included minority authorship. CONCLUSIONS: Following the Revitalization Act, minorities and women remain underrepresented in therapeutic clinical trials for neuroepithelial tumors, relative to disease incidence and mortality. Study accrual has improved with time. This study provides a framework for clinical trial accrual efforts and offers guidance regarding workforce considerations associated with enrollment of underserved patients.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Neoplasias , Selección de Paciente , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Grupos Minoritarios , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Neoplasias/terapia , Proyectos de Investigación , Estados Unidos
5.
World Neurosurg ; 166: e915-e923, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35944857

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Interfacility transfers represent a large proportion of neurosurgical admissions to tertiary care centers each year. In this study, the authors examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of transfers, timing of transfers, demographic profile of transfer patients, and clinical outcomes including rates of surgical intervention. METHODS: A retrospective review of neurosurgical transfer patients at a single tertiary center was performed. Patients transferred from April to November 2020 (the "COVID Era") were compared with an institutional database of transfer patients collected before the COVID-19 pandemic (the "Pre-COVID Era"). During the COVID Era, both emergent and nonemergent neurosurgical services had resumed. A comparison of demographic and clinical factors between the 2 cohorts was performed. RESULTS: A total of 674 patients were included in the study (331 Pre-COVID and 343 COVID-Era patients). Overall, there was no change in the average monthly number of transfers (P = 0.66) or in the catchment area of referral hospitals. However, COVID-Era patients were more likely to be uninsured (1% vs. 4%), had longer transfer times (COVID vs. Pre-COVID Era: 18 vs. 9 hours; P < 0.001), required higher rates of surgical intervention (63% vs. 50%, P = 0.001), had higher rates of spine pathology (17% vs. 10%), and less frequently were admitted to the intensive care unit (34% vs. 52%, P < 0.001). Overall, COVID-Era patients did not experience delays to surgical intervention (3.1 days vs. 3.6 days, P = 0.2). When analyzing the subgroup of COVID-Era patients, COVID infection status did not impact the time of transfer or rates of operation, although COVID-infected patients experienced a longer time to surgery after admission (14 vs. 2.9 days, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic did not reduce the number of monthly transfers, operation rates, or catchment area for transfer patients. Transfer rates of uninsured patients increased during the COVID Era, potentially reflecting changes in access to community neurosurgery care. Shorter time to surgery seen in COVID-Era patients possibly reflects institutional policies that improved operating room efficiency to compensate for surgical backlogs. COVID status affeted time to surgery, reflecting the preoperative care that these patients require before intervention.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neurocirugia , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Pandemias , Transferencia de Pacientes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA