Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Lancet ; 398(10317): 2186-2192, 2021 12 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34793741

RESUMEN

Since the first case of COVID-19 was identified in the USA in January, 2020, over 46 million people in the country have tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Several COVID-19 vaccines have received emergency use authorisations from the US Food and Drug Administration, with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine receiving full approval on Aug 23, 2021. When paired with masking, physical distancing, and ventilation, COVID-19 vaccines are the best intervention to sustainably control the pandemic. However, surveys have consistently found that a sizeable minority of US residents do not plan to get a COVID-19 vaccine. The most severe consequence of an inadequate uptake of COVID-19 vaccines has been sustained community transmission (including of the delta [B.1.617.2] variant, a surge of which began in July, 2021). Exacerbating the direct impact of the virus, a low uptake of COVID-19 vaccines will prolong the social and economic repercussions of the pandemic on families and communities, especially low-income and minority ethnic groups, into 2022, or even longer. The scale and challenges of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign are unprecedented. Therefore, through a series of recommendations, we present a coordinated, evidence-based education, communication, and behavioural intervention strategy that is likely to improve the success of COVID-19 vaccine programmes across the USA.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Conductista , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19/transmisión , Comunicación , Programas de Inmunización , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Política , Estados Unidos , Negativa a la Vacunación/psicología
4.
J Law Med Ethics ; 49(4): 552-563, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35006054

RESUMEN

This article argues that the Supreme Court should not require a religious exemption from vaccine mandates. For children, who cannot yet make autonomous religious decision, religious exemptions would allow parents to make a choice that puts the child at risk and makes the shared environment of the school unsafe - risking other people's children. For adults, there are still good reasons not to require a religious exemption, since vaccines mandates are adopted for public health reasons, not to target religion, are an area where free riding is a real risk, no religion actually prohibits vaccinating under a mandate, and policing religious exemptions is very difficult.


Asunto(s)
Vacunación , Vacunas , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Padres , Religión , Instituciones Académicas
6.
Vaccine ; 38(10): 2273-2274, 2020 02 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32033846
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA