Post-operative patient perception of decisional regret in cochlear implant recipients.

IMPORTANCE: Decision regret post-surgery has has been linked to health outcomes for a number of elective procedures but is understudied in cochlear implantation satisfaction. Theunpredictability in outcomes may lead to unmet expectations by the recipient. This study is the first study to investigate the decision regret concept in cochlear implant recipients. OBJECTIVE: Tto investigate post-operative decision regret in (CI) recipients. DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study using the validated Ottawa Decision Regret Scale, and whether the CI met the patient's expectations. Variables potentially associated with decision regret including patient demographics, post-operative speech perception scores, duration of deafness, duration of CI use and age were analyzed using the logistic regression model. SETTING: This was a multi-center study. Participants were recruited and enrolled from the University of Miami and the University of Kansas in an outpatient setting. PARTICIPANTS: Adult, English-speaking CI recipients with at least 6 months of listening experience with their implant. RESULTS: Out of 173 58% reported no regret, 27% reported mild, and 15% reported moderate-to-strong regret. Expectations were met in 77% while not meeting expectations in 14%. The remaining 8% were neutral. Decisional regret was significantly associated (p = 0.02) with poor post-operative speech perception. No other variables were associated with regret. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative decision regret was reported by 42% of CI recipients. Poor speech perception abilities were associated with increased risk of regret. Further research is required to identify regret risks and provide resources to mitigate regret in CI recipients.

The impact of COVID-19 on allied health professions.

The purpose of the current study was to examine the impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19) on allied health professionals work environment, access to personal protective equipment (PPE) and COVID-19 testing, and mental health. A 34-question survey was developed and distributed electronically to allied health professionals through listservs of professional organizations and social media groups. A total of 921 responses from allied health professionals in a variety of work settings were analyzed. The majority of allied health professionals had access to medical-grade PPE and agreed with their clinics decisions to stay open or closed. Private practices appeared to be the most negatively impacted with regards to employment in the form of pay reductions, furloughs, lay-offs, or the requirement of using paid time off. Importantly, 86% of all respondents, irrespective of employment status, reported feeling stressed with regards to changes in their work environment and transmission of the virus. However, levels of stress were dependent upon access to PPE and mental health resources. Specifically, those with access to mental health support reported lower stress levels than those without such access. These results highlight the need for continuous monitoring of mental health for allied health professionals in order to inform clinic and hospital policies for PPE and the development of brief interventions to mitigate adverse long-term mental health outcomes.