RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of avoidable admissions following anticipated same-day discharge for patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy and to identify risk factors associated with such admissions. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent a minimally invasive hysterectomy between March 2019 and July 2021 for a suspected gynecologic malignancy at a single tertiary care center. Pre-operatively, patients were assessed for same-day discharge versus planned admission. Reasons for day-of-surgery admission despite anticipated same-day discharge were categorized as anesthesia-related, system issues, intra-operative factors, post-operative pain, and social factors. Patients deemed not candidates for same-day discharge were defined as planned admissions. Indications were categorized as necessary or potentially avoidable. Descriptive and comparative statistics were used to summarize the cohort. RESULTS: In total, 372 patients were identified: 261 (70.2%) anticipated same-day discharges and 111 (29.8%) planned admissions. Of anticipated same-day discharges, 230/261 (88.1%) were successfully discharged, while 31/261 (11.9%) required admission. Reasons for unplanned admissions were anesthesia-related (14/31, 45.2%), system issues (7/31, 22.6%), intra-operative factors (5/31, 16.1%), post-operative pain (3/31, 9.7%), and social factors (2/31, 6.5%). Among the 111 pre-operatively planned admissions, 81 (73.0%) were necessary due to comorbidities or surgical complexity, while 30 (27.0%) were potentially avoidable because patients could have been optimized for same-day discharge. Opportunities for optimization pre-operatively included comorbidities (13/30, 43.3%), system issues (8/30, 26.7%), social factors (6/30, 20.0%), and provider preference (3/30, 10.0%). CONCLUSION: Most patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy can be safely discharged the same day. Potentially avoidable admissions were primarily related to patient comorbidities that can be better optimized pre-operatively.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The potential for the technique of small bite fascial closure in mitigating incisional hernias in gynecologic oncology patients still needs to be investigated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of closure of small fascial bites compared with prior standard closure on incisional hernia rates in gynecologic oncology patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study comparing patient outcomes before and after the intervention at a single institution at a comprehensive cancer center. Patients who underwent laparotomy with a vertical midline incision for a suspected or known gynecologic malignancy with a 1-year follow-up were included. The pre-intervention cohort (large bites) had 'mass' or modified running Smead-Jones closure. In contrast, the post-intervention cohort had fascial bites taken 5-8 mm laterally with no more than 5 mm travel (small bites) closure using a 2-0 polydioxanone suture.The primary outcome was the incisional hernias rate determined by imaging or clinical examination within the first year of follow-up. Patient factors and peri-operative variates of interest were investigated for their association with hernia formation through univariate and multivariate analyses. These included age, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, estimated blood loss, pre-operative albumin, American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status classification, or treatment with chemotherapy post-operatively. RESULTS: Of the 255 patients included, the total hernia rate was 12.5% (32/255 patients). Patient characteristics were similar in both cohorts. Small bite closure led to a significant reduction in hernia rates from 17.2% (22/128 patients) to 7.9% (10/127 patients), p=0.025. According to logistic regression modeling, small bite closure (OR=0.40, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.94, p=0.036) was independently associated with lower odds of hernia formation. Other factors associated with increased hernia rates were chemotherapy (OR=3.22, 95% CI 1.22 to 8.51, p=0.019) and obesity (OR=23.4, 95% CI 3.09 to 177, p=0.002). In obese patients, small bite closures led to maximal hernia rate reduction compared with large bites. CONCLUSIONS: The small bite closure technique effectively reduces hernia rates in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing midline laparotomy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos , Hernia Incisional , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hernia Incisional/prevención & control , Hernia Incisional/epidemiología , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Anciano , Adulto , Fasciotomía/métodos , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact a tailored opioid prescription calculator has on meeting individual patient opioid needs while avoiding opioid over prescriptions. METHODS: Our group previously developed and published an opioid prescribing calculator incorporating patient risk factors (history of depression, anxiety, chronic opioid use, substance abuse disorder, and/or chronic pain) and type of surgery (laparotomy or laparoscopy). This calculator was implemented on 1/1/2021 and its impact on opioid prescriptions was evaluated until 12/31/21. The primary outcome of the present study is to determine prescriber compliance with the calculator (defined as not overprescribing from the number of pills indicated by the calculator). The secondary outcome is to determine the excess prescription rate (defined as proportion of patients reporting more than 3 pills remaining at 30 days post-surgery). Refill rates and pain related patient phone calls were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the cohort. RESULTS: Of the 355 patients included, 54.7% (N = 194) underwent laparoscopy and 45.4% (N = 161) underwent laparotomy. One hundred and forty-two patients (40%) had at least one risk factor for opioid usage. The median number of opioid pills prescribed following laparoscopy was 3 (range 0-15) and 6 (0-20) after laparotomy. The prescriber compliance was 88.2% and the excess prescription rate was 25.1% (N = 89 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Our tailored opioid calculator has a high prescriber compliance. Implementation of this calculator led to a standardization of tailored opioid prescribing, while limiting the number of over prescriptions. A free web version of the calculator can be easily accessed at www.opioidcalculator.org.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Dolor Postoperatorio , Humanos , Femenino , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/efectos adversos , Prescripciones de MedicamentosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the venous thromboembolism (VTE) rate in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy before and after implementing routine thromboprophylaxis. METHODS: This is a quasi-experimental pre-post study evaluating the VTE rate in patients with ovarian cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy following a quality improvement initiative of routine thromboprophylaxis within a single healthcare system that started in January 2017. Patients were excluded if VTE was diagnosed before initiating chemotherapy. Patient factors and perioperative variables of interest were investigated for their association with VTE through univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: Of the 136 patients in the pre-implementation group, 3.7% (n = 5) received thromboprophylaxis. Of the 154 patients in the post-implementation group, 65.6% (n = 101) received thromboprophylaxis. Provider compliance varied from 51% in 2019 to 79.3% in 2021. The overall rate of VTE, from the start of chemotherapy to the end of treatment, was 21.3% (n = 29) pre- and 8.4% (n = 13) in the post-implementation group (p < 0.01). There was no difference in major bleeding events between groups (0% vs. 0.68%, p = 0.63). On univariate analysis, thromboprophylaxis (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.07-0.52) and post-implementation period (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.17-0.69) were associated with a decreased risk of any VTE during primary treatment. On multivariate analysis, only thromboprophylaxis remained significantly associated with reduced VTE rates (aOR 0.19; 95% CI 0.07-0.53). CONCLUSION: Routine thromboprophylaxis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with reduced risk of VTE throughout primary treatment and is not associated with increased bleeding events.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Femenino , Anticoagulantes , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To implement a quality-improvement initiative to assess the impact various patient and procedural factors have on postoperative opioid use. To develop a tailored opioid prescribing algorithm for gynecologic oncology patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients who underwent a laparoscopy or laparotomy procedure for a suspected or known gynecologic malignancy between 3/2019-9/2020. Patients were assessed preoperatively for the presence of suspected risk factors for opioid misuse (depression, anxiety, chronic pain, current opioid use, or substance abuse). Patients completed a 30-day postoperative questionnaire assessing for total opioid pill use and refills requests. Multivariate models were developed to estimate the independent effect of sociodemographic characteristics, risk factors for opioid misuse and procedural factors on patient reported postoperative opioid use. RESULTS: A total of 390 patients were analyzed. Thirty-nine percent (N = 151/390) of patients reported not using opioids after discharge and 5% (N = 20/390) received an opioid refill. For both minimally invasive procedures and laparotomy procedures, body mass index, comorbidities, intraoperative or postoperative complications and final diagnosis of malignancy were not associated with the amount of opioid consumption. However, younger age and history of risk factors for opioid misuse significantly impacted postoperative opioid use. In multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.038) and risk factors (p < 0.001) remained significant after controlling for other factors. CONCLUSIONS: Two out of every five patients did not use opioids after surgery. Younger patients and those with risk factors for opioid misuse need a tailored approach to prescribing opioids to balance the need for adequate pain control with the risk of misuse.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Michigan , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/prevención & controlRESUMEN
The NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms provide recommendations for diagnostic workup, clinical staging, and treatment options for patients with endometrial cancer or uterine sarcoma. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the recent addition of molecular profiling information to aid in accurate diagnosis, classification, and treatment of uterine sarcomas.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales , Sarcoma , Neoplasias Uterinas , Neoplasias Endometriales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Endometriales/genética , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Sarcoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Uterinas/genética , Neoplasias Uterinas/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To design and implement a standardized postoperative voiding management protocol that accurately identifies patients with urinary retention and reduces unnecessary re-catheterization. METHODS: A postoperative voiding management protocol was designed and implemented in patients undergoing major, inpatient, non-radical abdominal surgery with a gynecologic oncologist. No patients had epidural catheters. The implemented quality improvement (QI) protocol included: 1) Foley removal at six hours postoperatively; 2) universal bladder scan after the first void; and 3) limiting re-catheterization to patients with bladder scan volumes >150 ml. A total of 96 patients post-protocol implementation were compared to 52 patients pre-protocol. Along with baseline demographic data and timing of catheter removal, we recorded the presence or absence of urinary retention and/or unnecessary re-catheterization and postoperative urinary tract infection rates. Fisher's exact test and student's t-tests were performed for comparisons. RESULTS: The overall rate of postoperative urinary retention was 21.6% (32/148). The new voiding management protocol reduced the rate of unnecessary re-catheterization by 90% (13.5% vs 2.1%, p = 0.01), without overlooking true urinary retention (23.1% vs 20.8%, p = 0.83). Additionally, there was a significant increase in hospital-defined early discharge prior to 11:00 AM (4.0% vs 22.0%, p = 0.022). There was no difference in the postoperative urinary tract infection rate between the groups (p = 1.00). Risk factors associated with urinary retention included older age (p < 0.01), use of medications with anticholinergic properties (p < 0.01), and preexisting urinary dysfunction (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of this new voiding management protocol reduced unnecessary re-catheterization, captured and treated true urinary retention, and facilitated early hospital discharge.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Retención Urinaria/terapia , Factores de Edad , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Cateterismo Urinario/métodos , Retención Urinaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Retención Urinaria/etiologíaRESUMEN
The NCCN Guidelines for Cervical Cancer provide recommendations for diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment of patients with the disease. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the guidelines, including changes to first- and second-line systemic therapy recommendations for patients with recurrent or metastatic disease, and emerging evidence on a new histopathologic classification system for HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Femenino , Guías como Asunto , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of the increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the complexity of cytoreductive surgeries for ovarian cancer. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, we performed a retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 with stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent either primary cytoreductive surgery (PDS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery. Cases were assigned a surgical complexity category as 1) Inadequate, 2) Low, 3) Moderate and, 4) High complexity. The primary outcome was the trend in surgical complexity over time. Secondary outcomes included temporal trends in treatment modality, perioperative mortality, and survival. RESULTS: At total of 52,582 (76.3%) underwent PDS and 16,307 (23.7%) underwent NACT. The utilization of NACT increased from 7.7% in 2004 to 27.8% in 2015 (p-trendâ¯<â¯0.001). Patients undergoing moderate complexity surgeries increased from 28.9% to 33.5% and high complexity surgeries from 26.3% to 30% (p-trendâ¯<â¯0.001, for both). Trends in increasing surgical complexity were seen in both NACT and PDS cohorts. This increase in surgical complexity was seen most profoundly at the high-volume centers. Overall 30-day mortality decreased from 3.4% in 2004 to 1.4% in 2015; and 90-day mortality decreased from 7.6% to 4%. During the same time, 5-year survival increased from 39.7% to 49%. CONCLUSIONS: Increase in the utilization of NACT is associated with decreased 30- and 90-day mortality and increase in five-year survival. Moreover, the overall complexity of ovarian cancer surgery has increased in both PDS and NACT cohorts.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Cervical cancer is a malignant epithelial tumor that forms in the uterine cervix. Most cases of cervical cancer are preventable through human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination, routine screening, and treatment of precancerous lesions. However, due to inadequate screening protocols in many regions of the world, cervical cancer remains the fourth-most common cancer in women globally. The complete NCCN Guidelines for Cervical Cancer provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of cervical cancer. This manuscript discusses guiding principles for the workup, staging, and treatment of early stage and locally advanced cervical cancer, as well as evidence for these recommendations. For recommendations regarding treatment of recurrent or metastatic disease, please see the full guidelines on NCCN.org.
Asunto(s)
Oncología Médica/normas , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/terapia , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/normas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Braquiterapia/métodos , Braquiterapia/normas , Cuello del Útero/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuello del Útero/patología , Cuello del Útero/virología , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/normas , Femenino , Preservación de la Fertilidad/métodos , Preservación de la Fertilidad/normas , Humanos , Histerectomía/normas , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Oncología Médica/métodos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/normas , Prueba de Papanicolaou/normas , Papillomaviridae/aislamiento & purificación , Papillomaviridae/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/patología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virologíaRESUMEN
Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN), a subset of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD), occurs when tumors develop in the cells that would normally form the placenta during pregnancy. The NCCN Guidelines for Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia provides treatment recommendations for various types of GTD including hydatidiform mole, persistent post-molar GTN, low-risk GTN, high-risk GTN, and intermediate trophoblastic tumor.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Trofoblástica Gestacional , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Oncología MédicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal first-line chemotherapy for ovarian carcinosarcoma has not yet been determined. We therefore sought to determine the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with ovarian carcinosarcoma treated at our institution with different first-line chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: This single-institution, retrospective analysis included all patients with ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinosarcoma diagnosed from September 1996 to July 2017. Kaplan Meier analysis with a log-rank Mantel-Cox test was used to compare PFS and OS between treatment groups, and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients met inclusion criteria: two patients were stage IC, 5 were stage II, 21 were stage III, and 3 were stage IV. The median PFS and OS for all stages was 9.3 and 19.7 months respectively. Fifteen patients (48%) received carboplatin/paclitaxel as first therapy, 7 (23%) received ifosfamide/paclitaxel, 6 (19%) received a different regimen, and 3 (10%) did not receive chemotherapy. Patients treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel had a statistically significant longer PFS when compared to those receiving ifosfamide/paclitaxel (17.8 vs. 8.0 months, p = 0.025). OS was similar between all comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, in our cohort of ovarian carcinosarcoma patients, median PFS is longer in patients treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel compared to ifosfamide/paclitaxel. Overall survival was similar for all treatment groups, potentially due to subsequent treatment crossover. Given the rarity and aggressive nature of this tumor, further study into optimal first-line chemotherapy is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinosarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Ifosfamida/administración & dosificación , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The opioid crisis in the United States has been declared a public health emergency. Various governmental agencies, cancer care organizations and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have issued guidelines in hopes of managing this crisis. Curbing over-prescription of opioids by medical professionals has been a central theme in many of these guidelines. Gynecologic oncologists encounter patients with a variety of pain sources, including acute pain secondary to the underlying malignancy or surgical procedures as well as chronic pain related to the malignancy and the sequelae of treatments rendered. In this review, we discuss the various etiologies of pain experienced by gynecologic oncology patients and discuss modalities frequently used to treat this pain. We highlight strategies to reduce the number of opioids prescribed and focus on incorporating non-opioid pain relief management principles in this review. We also discuss the mechanisms and etiology of various types of pain, with a focus on multimodal treatment strategies including preoperative counseling, strategies to identify individuals at risk of developing opioid dependence, and the role of symptom management and palliative care teams. Finally, we provide a blueprint for gynecologic oncology practices to develop their practice-specific pain management contracts to engage patients in a meaningful conversation around the addictive potential of opioids.
Asunto(s)
Dolor en Cáncer/etiología , Dolor en Cáncer/terapia , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/fisiopatología , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/terapia , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor en Cáncer/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor en Cáncer/fisiopatología , Femenino , Ginecología/métodos , Humanos , Oncología Médica/métodosRESUMEN
Endometrial carcinoma is a malignant epithelial tumor that forms in the inner lining, or endometrium, of the uterus. Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy. Approximately two-thirds of endometrial carcinoma cases are diagnosed with disease confined to the uterus. The complete NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of endometrial cancer and uterine sarcoma. This manuscript discusses guiding principles for the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of early-stage endometrial carcinoma as well as evidence for these recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Uterinas/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Uterinas/etiologíaRESUMEN
Vulvar cancer is a rare gynecologic malignancy. Ninety percent of vulvar cancers are predominantly squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), which can arise through human papilloma virus (HPV)-dependent and HPV-independent pathways. The NCCN Vulvar Cancer panel is an interdisciplinary group of representatives from NCCN Member Institutions consisting of specialists in gynecological oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and pathology. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Vulvar Cancer provide an evidence- and consensus-based approach for the management of patients with vulvar SCC. This manuscript discusses the recommendations outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for diagnosis, staging, treatment, and follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/terapia , Neoplasias de la Vulva/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Vulva/terapia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Biopsia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Quimioradioterapia , Femenino , Humanos , Oncología Médica/normas , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/patología , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Neoplasias de la Vulva/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Vulva/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic camera navigation is vital to laparoscopic surgery, yet often falls to the most junior member of the surgical team who has limited laparoscopic operating experience. Previously published reports on simulation models fail to address qualitative scoring of movement, method of communication and correct physician location with respect to patient position. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a novel laparoscopic camera navigation simulation model that addresses these deficiencies. METHODS: A novel, low-cost laparoscopic camera navigational maze was constructed from pliable foam for use in a standard laparoscopic surgery box trainer. Participants (n = 37) completed a camera navigation exercise by following a pre-recorded set of verbal instructions using correct anatomic terminology that is used in the operating room, to simulate an actual operating room experience of receiving verbal cues from senior surgeons. The sample group consisted of participants at various levels of Obstetrics and Gynecology training, representing novice to expert laparoscopists. Each trial was recorded with a multi-channel video camera. Performances were scored by a blinded evaluator for excess gross and fine camera movements as well as overt errors, including camera collisions and failure to follow directions. RESULTS: Our model demonstrated evidence of validity by discriminating performance by level of laparoscopic experience with a statistically significant decrease in number of movements and errors in experts compared to novices. A trend emerged toward improvement with each additional year of training, with reduced variability among performances in more experienced participants. CONCLUSIONS: This novel, low-cost box-trainer simulation model for laparoscopic camera navigation offers a mechanism for assessment of laparoscopic camera operation skills. Moreover, this model closely replicates operating room logistics and communication. Given the necessity for improved laparoscopic camera operation education, our model represents a unique, complementary tool to other laparoscopic simulation curricula.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/educación , Laparoscopía/educación , Cirugía Asistida por Video , Humanos , Modelos Anatómicos , Entrenamiento SimuladoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To examine the underlying indications, timing, and risk factors associated with unplanned hospital readmissions after major surgery for a gynecologic malignancy. METHODS: This is a retrospective database cohort study utilizing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (NSQIP). The association between risk factors with respect to 30-day unplanned readmission was modeled using logistic regression. Timing of readmission and the primary reason of readmission was abstracted from the database. RESULTS: Overall, the unplanned readmission rate was 6.5% (832/12,804). On multivariate analysis, operative time≥3h (OR 1.39, p<0.001), open abdominal surgery (OR 2.2, p<0.001), any complication prior to discharge (OR 1.6, p<0.001), two or more additional surgical procedures (OR 1.34, p=0.003), or cervical cancer as the site of primary disease (OR 1.30, p=0.05) were noted to be independent predictors of readmission. To provide a convenient calculation of overall probability of readmission, we developed a nomogram of factors significantly predicting readmission. Overall, infections were a cause of 45% of the readmissions. Surgical Site Infections were the most common reason, accounting for 29.2% of all readmissions. A majority of the readmissions (approximately 75%) were within two weeks of discharge from the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to reduce readmission rates should focus on identifying patients at a high risk of readmission and reducing surgical site infections. Additionally, prospective evaluation of interventions targeted at reducing readmissions should focus on the first two weeks after discharge from the hospital.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida QuirúrgicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the usage of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (C-CRT) for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS: Patients with locally invasive cervical carcinoma diagnosed between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2012 from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) were included. Outcomes for patients undergoing radiation therapy only, 'RT alone' group were compared to those receiving chemotherapy concurrent with radiation 'C-CRT group'. Trends in utilization of C-CRT and factors associated with the deviation from standard of care were explored. Lastly, the effect of hospital volume on utilization of C-CRT was investigated. RESULTS: A total of 18,164 patients undergoing definitive radiation therapy were available for analysis. Utilization of C-CRT increased from 72.4% in 2004 to 84.3% in 2012 (p-trend<0.001). After adjusting for patient, tumor, and treatment factors, a multivariable logistic regression model revealed increasing age, African-American race, Charlson-comorbidity index of ≥2, Medicaid insurance status, uninsured status, and Stage I disease were each independently associated with the lack of C-CRT. After adjusting for patient characteristics, low volume hospitals were noted to have overall significantly lower rates and greater variation in C-CRT administration. Patients in 'RT alone' group had an overall worse survival rate (adjusted-HR 1.47, 95%CI 1.4-1.56). CONCLUSION: Rates of C-CRT administration varied significantly across hospitals in the United States. Hospitals with a high case volume had higher rates and more consistent patterns of C-CRT administration. Furthermore, we identified independent factors, all of which represent noteworthy health disparities, associated with lower rates of C-CRT administration.
Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/radioterapia , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Quimioradioterapia/economía , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Quimioradioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/economía , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the adherence to hematologic chemotherapy hold parameters for the carboplatin and dose-dense paclitaxel chemotherapy regimen in patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancers. METHODS: This is a quality assessment survey study. All 26 NCCN Member Institutions were contacted electronically. Hematologic chemotherapy hold parameter values (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] and platelet count) on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle were queried. These hold parameters were compared with published data supporting the use of dose-dense chemotherapy regimens in ovarian cancer. RESULTS: The overall survey response rate was 85% (22/26 sites). Of responders, 27% (6 sites) were fully adherent with all hematologic hold parameters and 64% (14 sites) used hold parameters that differed from the published protocol. Specifically, all of these sites use hold parameters higher than those recommended in the literature. Two centers did not have center-specific hold parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Carboplatin and dose-dense paclitaxel chemotherapy has been shown to increase progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with stage II-IV ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancers. However, our study found that two-thirds of queried sites had hold parameters higher than those in the published protocol. Using more stringent hold parameters may lead to compromised clinical outcomes. Further research is necessary to determine the optimal strategy to increase individual site adherence to chemotherapy hematologic hold parameters as specified in published trials.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carboplatino/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Reviewing program educational efforts is an important component of postgraduate medical education program accreditation. The post-graduate review process has evolved over time to include centralized oversight based on accreditation standards. The institutional review process and the impact on participating faculty are topics not well described in the literature. METHODS: We conducted multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles to identify and implement areas for change to improve productivity in our institutional program review committee. We also conducted one focus group and six in-person interviews with 18 committee members to explore their perspectives on the committee's evolution. One author (MLL) reviewed the transcripts and performed the initial thematic coding with a PhD level research associate and identified and categorized themes. These themes were confirmed by all participating committee members upon review of a detailed summary. Emergent themes were triangulated with the University of Michigan Medical School's Admissions Executive Committee (AEC). RESULTS: We present an overview of adopted new practices to the educational program evaluation process at the University of Michigan Health System that includes standardization of meetings, inclusion of resident members, development of area content experts, solicitation of committed committee members, transition from paper to electronic committee materials, and focus on continuous improvement. Faculty and resident committee members identified multiple improvement areas including the ability to provide high quality reviews of training programs, personal and professional development, and improved feedback from program trainees. CONCLUSIONS: A standing committee that utilizes the expertise of a group of committed faculty members and which includes formal resident membership has significant advantages over ad hoc or other organizational structures for program evaluation committees.