RESUMEN
Background: Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMJDs) are the main musculoskeletal cause of orofacial pain. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of manual therapy and routine treatment compared with routine treatment on pain, maximum mouth opening (MMO), and cervical range of motion (ROM) in patients with the temporomandibular joint disorder (TMJD). Methods: This study was performed at the biomechanics laboratory of the physiotherapy department of Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. A total of 30 patients with TMJD were randomized into 2 groups: an intervention group (manual therapy plus routine treatment) and a control group (conventional treatment). Treatment included 10 sessions. The primary outcome was pain intensity and the secondary outcomes were MMO, and range of cervical flexion and extension. The outcomes were measured at the baseline, at the end of the treatment, and after a 4-week follow-up period. The repeated measures analysis of variance was used to assess group × time interaction, and the Bonferroni adjustment was used for between-group comparisons. The effects size of Cohen's d was used to determine the magnitude of between-group differences. Results: The results showed that there were significant group × time interactions for pain, MMO, and the cervical flexion ROM (P<0.001). In comparion with the baseline, the intervention group showed significant improvements in jaw pain, MMO, and cervical flexion ROM (P<0.001), while in the control group, compared with the baseline, only pain and MMO significantly improved (P<0.05). Results of between-group comparisons revealed that there were significant and clinical differences between the 2 groups after treatment, and the intervention group had lower jaw pain, more MMO, and cervical flexion than the control group (P<0.001). In addition, the efficacy of manual therapy based on the Cohen's d was large for the outcomes of pain, MMO, and cervical flexion. Conclusion: The findings showed that adding manual therapy of the upper cervical spine and TMJ to the routine treatment could be an effective intervention for patients with TMD.
RESUMEN
Background: So far, there is much less information about the effects of urinary incontinence on postural control. Therefore the aim of this study is to investigate the differences in postural control using linear and non-linear analyses of the center of pressure (COP) time-series in anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions between females with and without stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods: This case-control study included 22 continent females and 22 SUI females. In this study, static postural control during four different postural tasks was evaluated using a force plate. All participants performed separate 60-sec standing trials with eyes open in the empty bladder and full bladder conditions. Mean, range, velocity, area circle of COP displacements, and approximate entropy (ApEn) of COP time-series were calculated from the 60-sec standing trials for all participants. The independent sample t-test was also used to compare COP variables between the two groups and paired sample t-test was used to assess changes between the full bladder and empty bladder conditions within each group. The effect size of Cohen's d was used to assess the magnitude of the differences between the two groups. Results: The findings revealed a significant group × task interaction for the mean of ML displacement and ApEn of COP. SUI females showed more AP displacement range in the full bladder (pvalue= 0.020, effect size=0.74) and a higher velocity (empty bladder: p=0.040, effect size=0.63) (full bladder: p=0.020, effect size=0.75) than the continent group. Generally, the SUI females had lower ApEn than the continent females, although the differences were not significant. While the variables of COP were unaffected by bladder fullness in the continent group, the SUI group in full bladder condition experienced more AP range (p=0.030), and area circle (p=0.007) of COP sway in quiet standing. Conclusion: These results provide more support for the hypothesis that postural control can be impaired following SUI, although future investigations on this topic are recommended.