Efficacy of N-acetylcysteine for treating dryness symptoms of Sjögren's disease: randomised placebo-controlled double-blind clinical study.

OBJECTIVES: N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is used in Sjögren's disease (SjD) based on limited evidence. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of NAC for relieving dryness symptoms in SjD. METHODS: In this placebo-controlled double-blind trial, 60 adult SjD females (with low disease activity) were randomised to receive NAC (1,200 mg/day orally) or placebo. At baseline (D0), 30 days (D30) and 90 days (D90), all participants underwent the following evaluations: EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI), Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Xerostomia Inventory (XI), Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), unstimulated/stimulated salivary flow, Schirmer's test, and plasma levels of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), glutathione and NAC. RESULTS: At inclusion, both groups were balanced for age, ethnicity, disease duration, ESSPRI, OSDI, XI, Schirmer's test, salivary flow, ESSDAI and topical/systemic treatments (p>0.05). No significant differences were observed between NAC and placebo groups on D30 and D90 regarding ESSPRI, XI, OSDI, LCQ, Schirmer's test, stimulated salivary flow, ESSDAI and topical/systemic treatments (p>0.05). Unstimulated salivary flow was significantly higher in the placebo group on D90 (p=0.018). NAC blood concentrations were significantly higher in the NAC group on D30 (p=0.018) and D90 (p<0.001), however, no differences were found in TBARS and glutathione. Further analysis showed decrease≥1 in ESSPRI in the NAC compared with placebo group on D30 (p=0.045), a result not found on D90 (p=0.696). CONCLUSIONS: NAC is recommended as a rescue therapy for SjD. However, our well-designed study provides novel evidence demonstrating its inefficacy for improving dryness symptoms or reducing oxidative stress. CLINICALTRIALS: gov-NCT04793646.

Immunogenicity, safety, and antiphospholipid antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has an increased risk of coagulopathy with high frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Recent reports of thrombosis associated with adenovirus-based vaccines raised concern that SARS-CoV-2 immunization in primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) patients may trigger clotting complications. Our objectives were to assess immunogenicity, safety, and aPL production in PAPS patients, after vaccinating with Sinovac-CoronaVac, an inactivated virus vaccine against COVID-19. METHODS: This prospective controlled phase-4 study of PAPS patients and a control group (CG) consisted of a two-dose Sinovac-CoronaVac (D0/D28) and blood collection before vaccination (D0), at D28 and 6 weeks after second dose (D69) for immunogenicity/aPL levels. Outcomes were seroconversion (SC) rates of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG and/or neutralizing antibodies (NAb) at D28/D69 in naïve participants. Safety and aPL production were also assessed. RESULTS: We included 44 PAPS patients (31 naïve) and 132 CG (108 naïve) with comparable age (p=0.982) and sex (p>0.999). At D69, both groups had high and comparable SC (83.9% vs. 93.5%, p=0.092), as well as NAb positivity (77.4% vs. 78.7%, p=0.440), and NAb-activity (64.3% vs. 60.9%, p=0.689). Thrombotic events up to 6 months or other moderate/severe side effects were not observed. PAPS patients remained with stable aPL levels throughout the study at D0 vs. D28 vs. D69: anticardiolipin (aCL) IgG (p=0.058) and IgM (p=0.091); anti-beta-2 glycoprotein I (aß2GPI) IgG (p=0.513) and IgM (p=0.468). CONCLUSION: We provided novel evidence that Sinovac-CoronaVac has high immunogenicity and safety profile in PAPS. Furthermore, Sinovac-CoronaVac did not trigger thrombosis nor induced changes in aPL production.

2019-EULAR/ACR classification criteria domains at diagnosis: predictive factors of long-term damage in systemic lupus erythematosus.

The objective of this study is to assess the role of the 2019-European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (2019-EULAR/ACR) classification criteria at diagnosis and its domains in predicting long-term damage in systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE). We performed a retrospective analysis using an electronic chart database utilized in routine clinical care of SLE patients and established in 2000 in a tertiary hospital. Two hundred and nine consecutive SLE patients with disease onset ≥18 years old and long disease duration were included. Cumulative damage at the last visit was scored using the SLICC/ACR-Damage Index (SDI). The median age at SLE diagnosis was 28 years (18-63), disease duration was 14 years (8-25), and 88% were females. Damage (SDI≥1) was observed in 116/209 (55%). Patients with (SDI≥1, n=116) and without damage (SDI=0, n=93) had similar median disease duration [14 (8-25) vs. 12 (8-25) years, p=0.090] and age at diagnosis [23 (18-55) vs. 23 (18-56) years, p=0.998]. No correlation was observed between total 2019-EULAR/ACR score at diagnosis and SDI at last visit (r=0.007, p=0.913). Presence of renal domain at diagnosis was associated with renal damage at last visit (OR=3.6, 95%CI 1.2-10.4, p=0.017) and antiphospholipid antibodies domain predicted neuropsychiatric damage (OR=3.0, 95%CI 1.2-7.6, p=0.015). A ROC analysis identified that a cut-off >24 in 2019-EULAR/ACR score could predict a trend for renal damage (p=0.077) with a lower renal survival (Kaplan-Meier curve) for patients above this limit (p=0.029). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that 2019-EULAR/ACR score >24 at diagnosis (OR 4.583, 95%CI 1.052-19.962, p=0.043) was independently associated with renal damage. Specific domains in the 2019-EULAR/ACR criteria at diagnosis were associated with long-term organ-specific damage, particularly renal and neuropsychiatric harm. A 2019-EULAR/ACR score >24 predicted worse renal survival. Key Points • Presence of renal domain of the 2019-EULAR/ACR classification criteria at diagnosis was associated with long-term renal damage. • Presence of antiphospholipid antibodies domain at diagnosis was associated with long-term neuropsychiatric damage. • A 2019-EULAR/ACR overall score >24 at diagnosis was independently associated with renal damage and predicted worse renal long-term survival.

Immunogenicity and safety of the CoronaVac inactivated vaccine in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a phase 4 trial.

CoronaVac, an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, has been approved for emergency use in several countries. However, its immunogenicity in immunocompromised individuals has not been well established. We initiated a prospective phase 4 controlled trial (no. NCT04754698, CoronavRheum) in 910 adults with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) and 182 age- and sex-frequency-matched healthy adults (control group, CG), who received two doses of CoronaVac. The primary outcomes were reduction of ≥15% in both anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroconversion (SC) and neutralizing antibody (NAb) positivity 6 weeks (day 69 (D69)) after the second dose in the ARD group compared with that in the CG. Secondary outcomes were IgG SC and NAb positivity at D28, IgG titers and neutralizing activity at D28 and D69 and vaccine safety. Prespecified endpoints were met, with lower anti-SARS-Cov-2 IgG SC (70.4 versus 95.5%, P < 0.001) and NAb positivity (56.3 versus 79.3%, P < 0.001) at D69 in the ARD group than in the CG. Moreover, IgG titers (12.1 versus 29.7, P < 0.001) and median neutralization activity (58.7 versus 64.5%, P = 0.013) were also lower at D69 in patients with ARD. At D28, patients with ARD presented with lower IgG frequency (18.7 versus 34.6%, P < 0.001) and NAb positivity (20.6 versus 36.3%, P < 0.001) than that of the CG. There were no moderate/severe adverse events. These data support the use of CoronaVac in patients with ARD, suggesting reduced but acceptable short-term immunogenicity. The trial is still ongoing to evaluate the long-term effectiveness/immunogenicity.