Microalgae biomass as a renewable biostimulant: meat processing industry effluent treatment, soil health improvement, and plant growth.

Microalgae biomass contributes to effluent bioremediation. It is a concentrated source of nutrients and organic carbon, making it a potential alternative as a soil biostimulant. In this context, this study aimed to evaluate the soil application of microalgae biomass produced from the meat processing industry effluent treatment. The biomass was applied dry and as a mixture to demonstrate its potential to increase plant production and soil metabolic functions, analyzed short-term. Doses of 0.25%, 0.5%, 1%, and 2% biomass were applied in soils from (i) Horizon A: taken at a depth between 0 and 10 cm and; (ii) Horizon B: taken at a depth between 20 and 40 cm. Corn growth (Zea Mays L.), basal soil respiration, microbial biomass carbon, total organic carbon, ß-glucosidase, acid phosphatase, arylsulfatase, and urease enzymatic activity were evaluated in each sample. It is concluded that applying 2% microalgae biomass led to higher basal soil respiration, microbial biomass carbon, and ß-glucosidase, acid phosphatase, arylsulfatase enzymatic activity in both soils. On the other hand, boron may have contributed to urease activity reduction in Soil A. Although 2% biomass led to higher soils characteristics, that dose did not promote higher plant growth. Hence, considering that plant growth must be in line with changes in soil characteristics, the result that provided the higher plant shoot dry matter mass was by applying 0.55% biomass in both soils. Therefore, the application of microalgae biomass produced from a meat processing industry effluent treatment promoted a biologically active soil and boosted plant growth.

Organomineral fertilizers pastilles from microalgae grown in wastewater: Ammonia volatilization and plant growth.

With the increasing demand for food, it is increasingly important to maintain soil fertility with the application of fertilizers to supply the nutritional needs of plants. However, the nutrients applied to the soil can suffer significant losses, impacting the environment, and increasing production costs. Using alternative sources, such as microalgae biomass (MB) generated in the treatment of wastewater, in the production of organomineral fertilizers is a way to recover nutrients from the sewage, in addition to contributing to the improvement in soil fertility and favoring crop growth, which can guarantee agricultural sustainability. In the present study, MB was grown in the effluent 00from the food industry and, subsequently, a pelleted organomineral fertilizer (POF) was produced consisting of the combination of MB and synthetic fertilizer (urea), in different proportions. The performance of the proposed fertilizer was analyzed for losses due to ammonia volatilization (N-NH3) over time, for nitrogen assimilation capacity (N) by corn plants (Zea mays L.), and its structure was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. The study concluded that the highest accumulated volatilization of N-NH3 was in the proportion of 40% of MB and the maximum content of N is reached in the proportion of 24.55% of MB. From the proportion of 25% of MB, there is no increase in N absorbed by plants, at the same time that the volatilization of N-NH3 grows with the increase in MB. The most important factors for obtaining these results were the interaction between MB and urea in the produced organomineral fertilizer tablet, where an increasingly thicker physical barrier was formed with the increase in the proportion of MB; in addition to the POF pH, in which the increase in MB proportions directly favored the pH increase.

Microalgae based biofertilizer: A life cycle approach.

Waste, especially biomass in general, is a large reservoir of nutrients that can be recovered through different technologies and used to produce biofertilizers. In the present study, environmental impacts of the production of microalgae biomass-based phosphate biofertilizer compared to triple superphosphate through life-cycle assessment conducted in the Simapro® software were investigated. The functional unit of the analysis was 163 g of P for both fertilizers. Phosphorus was recovered from a meat processing industry effluent in a high-rate algal pond. Impacts related to the entire biofertilizer chain impacted mainly on climate changes (3.17 kg CO2eq). Microalgae biofertilizer had higher environmental impact than conventional fertilizer in all impact categories, highlighting climate change and terrestrial ecotoxicity. An ideal scenario was created considering that: all energy used comes from photovoltaic panels; in the separation step a physical method will be used, without energy expenditure (i.e. gravimetric sedimentation) and; biomass will be dried in a drying bed instead of the thermal drying. In this scenario, the impact of biofertilizer approached considerably those of triple superphosphate. When impacts of biomass cultivation and concentration stages were disregarded, drying step was of great relevance, contributing to increase biofertilizer impacts. More research is needed to optimize the algae production chain and determine the possibility of obtaining higher added value products more environmental attractive.

Algal biomass from wastewater: soil phosphorus bioavailability and plants productivity.

The cultivation of microalgae in wastewater allows to obtain a biomass concentrated in nutrients and organic material. This biomass added to phosphate fertilizers can promote a slow release of the nutrient and consequently a higher absorption of phosphorus (P). The objective of this study was to investigate P uptake by plants subjected to triple superphosphate (TSP) fertilization, added with microalgae biomass (MB) grown in wastewater. TSP was added with different MB proportions in order to verify if there would be a different behaviour in P release for millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) plants. With the proportion that maximized P accumulation in plants, a second experiment was carried out to investigate whether MB exerts influence of P diffusion in the soil. Finally, a third trial was conducted in a greenhouse, where TSP and TSP + 12% MB were applied to the soil under different phosphorus doses in corn (Zea mays L.). The proportion of MB in TSP that maximized the increase of P content and concentration in plants was approximately 12% MB. From this proportion, a reduction in the values of the variables analysed in the plant with the increase of the proportion of MB in the biofertilizer was observed. Similar behaviour was observed when evaluating P diffusion in sandy and clay soils. Fertilizers TSP and TSP + 12% MB showed no difference in P diffusion in the soil, while the ratio of 30% MB clearly impaired P diffusion. In a greenhouse, the P content presented significant difference for the tests carried out with TSP and TSP + 12% MB fertilizer, in which the latter provided higher P recovery rate by plants. Therefore, MB added to TSP had a positive influence on plant development and its P recovery capacity when applied in a proportion of 12% MB to the fertilizer mass.

Microalgae biofilm in soil: Greenhouse gas emissions, ammonia volatilization and plant growth.

Microalgal biofilm in soils represents an alternative fertilization method for agricultural sustainability. In the present study, greenhouse gas emission, soil ammonia volatilization, and the growth of Pennisetum glaucum were evaluated under the effect of a microalgal biofilm, commercial urea, and a control (without application of a nitrogen source). CH4 emissions were equal for the three treatments (p>0.05). CO2 emissions significantly increased in microalgal biofilm treatment (p<0.01), which was also responsible for the highest N2O emissions (p<0.01). The ammonia (NNH3) volatilization losses were 4.63%, 18.98%, and 0.82% for the microalgal biofilm, urea, and control treatments, respectively. The main differences in soil characteristics were an increase in nitrogen and an increase in cation exchange capacity (p<0.01) caused by the algal biomass application to the soil. The soil organic matter content significantly differed (p<0.05) among the three treatments, with the microalgal biofilm treatment having the greatest increase in soil organic matter. Significant differences were observed for shoot dry matter mass and nitrogen content in the plants from both treatments where nitrogen sources were applied. All treatments differed from each other in leaf dry matter mass, with the urea treatment increasing the most. Chlorella vulgaris was the dominant microalgal specie in the soil.