An NS5A single optimized method to determine genotype, subtype and resistance profiles of Hepatitis C strains.

The objective was to develop a method of HCV genome sequencing that allowed simultaneous genotyping and NS5A inhibitor resistance profiling. In order to validate the use of a unique RT-PCR for genotypes 1-5, 142 plasma samples from patients infected with HCV were analysed. The NS4B-NS5A partial region was successfully amplified and sequenced in all samples. In parallel, partial NS3 sequences were analyzed obtained for genotyping. Phylogenetic analysis showed concordance of genotypes and subtypes with a bootstrap >95% for each type cluster. NS5A resistance mutations were analyzed using the Geno2pheno [hcv] v0.92 tool and compared to the list of known Resistant Associated Substitutions recently published. In conclusion, this tool allows determination of HCV genotypes, subtypes and identification of NS5A resistance mutations. This single method can be used to detect pre-existing resistance mutations in NS5A before treatment and to check the emergence of resistant viruses while undergoing treatment in major HCV genotypes (G1-5) in the EU and the US.

Emergence of HCV resistance-associated variants in patients failing sofosbuvir-based regimens: an observational cohort.

BACKGROUND: Real-life effectiveness data of new hepatitis C direct-acting antivirals are now required. The present study aims to assess the rate of sustained viral response (SVR) and virological failure (VF) in patients infected with chronic HCV treated with sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens in routine medical practice. METHODS: This observational study included a total of 106 patients infected with HCV genotypes (G)1-4, who initiated SOF-based regimens in 2014. Viral load was followed at baseline, week (W)2, W4, W12 (or W24) and W12 post-treatment. For all VFs, resistance-associated variants (RAVs) were determined at baseline and failure by sequencing of NS5A, NS5B and/or NS3 genes, using the Sanger method. RESULTS: SVR rate was 85% for the whole cohort, 91% for the patients who underwent the full treatment course. The distribution of HCV genotypes was as follows: G1 n=66 (1a=33, 1b=29; 62%), G2 n=8 (8%), G3a n=20 (19%) and G4 n=12 (11%). The main regimens used were SOF+daclatasvir (37%), SOF+ribavirin (33%), SOF+simeprevir (26%) and SOF+ledipasvir (3%). Twenty-five (23%) patients were HIV-coinfected and 1 was HBV-coinfected. Seventy (65%) patients had a prior treatment experience. All VF were relapses (n=9): 3 G1a, 1 G2, 4 G3a and 1 G4, and mutations conferring resistance to NS5A inhibitors were found but none for NS5B polymerase inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-life context, the rate of SVR in DAA-treated HCV-infected patients is close to clinical Phase III trial results. RAVs emerged for all patients treated by the anti-NS5A daclatasvir, and persisted several weeks after the end of treatment.